Expert Evidence

, Volume 7, Issue 1, pp 37–58 | Cite as

The Reality and Myth of Rape: Implications for theCriminal Justice System

  • Katherine E. Edward
  • Malcolm D. MacLeod


This article sets out to evaluate the researchevidence for rape myths and the extent to which theyare causally related to rape proclivity; negativeattitudes towards rape victims; and the reporting ofsexual assault incidents to the police. In reviewingthis literature, we provide an evaluation of theimpact of this research on the criminal justice systemand possible future developments. We argue that thisresearch, while failing to provide conclusive evidenceof a causal relationship, has nevertheless played animportant part in shaping more sympathetic approachestowards rape victims in the criminal justice system.However, we also argue that the current research fallsshort of the level of proof required for it to beadmitted as evidence in criminal trials. We considera number of alternative uses including AmicusCuriae briefs, and the training of juries and judgesprior to hearing rape cases.

expert evidence rape rape myths reporting stereotypes 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aizenman, M. and Kelley, G. (1988) “The Incidence of Violence and Acquaintance Rape in Dating Relationships among College Men and Women”, Journal of College Student Development 29: 305-311.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, S., Grove-Smith, C., Kinsey, R. and Wood, J. (1990) The Edinburgh Crime Survey. Central Research Unit Papers. Edinburgh: The Scottish Office.Google Scholar
  3. Bachman, R. (1993) “Predicting the Reporting of Rape Victimizations: Have Rape Reforms Made a Difference?” Criminal Justice and Behaviour 20: 254-270.Google Scholar
  4. Barnett, N.J. and Feild, H.S. (1977) “Sex Differences in University Students' Attitudes toward Rape”, Journal of College Student Personnel 18: 93-96.Google Scholar
  5. Bart, P.B. and O'Brien, P.B. (1985). Stopping Rape: Successful Survival Strategies. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bell, P. (1990) Women's Support Project/Evening Times Report on Responses from 1503 Women to the Survey on Violence Against Women. Glasgow: Women's Support Project.Google Scholar
  7. Blair, I. (1985) Investigating Rape: A New Approach for Police. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  8. Bodenhausen, G.V. and Lichtenstein, M. (1987) “Social Stereotypes and Information-processing Strategies: The Impact of Task Complexity”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52: 871-880.Google Scholar
  9. Bohner, G., Reinhard, M-A., Rutz, S., Sturm, S., Kerschbaum, B. and Effler, D. (1998) “Rape Myths as Neutralizing Cognitions: Evidence for a Causal Impact of Anti-victim Attitudes on Men's Self-reported likelihood of raping”, European Journal of Social Psychology 28: 257-268.Google Scholar
  10. Bonney, R. (1985) Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research Crimes: Sexual Assault Amendment Act. Sydney: Attorney General's Department.Google Scholar
  11. Bownes, I.T., O'Gorman, E.C. and Sayers, A. (1991) “Psychiatric Symptoms, Behavioural Responses and Post-traumatic Stress Disorder in Rape Victims”, Issues in Criminological and Legal Psychology 1/17: 25-33.Google Scholar
  12. Brekke, N. and Borgida, E. (1988) “Expert Psychological Testimony in Rape Trial: A Social-cognitive Analysis”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 55: 372-386.Google Scholar
  13. Brown, J. and King, J. (1998) “Gender Differences in Police Officers' Attitudes towards Rape: Results of an Exploratory Study”, Psychology, Crime and Law 4: 265-279.Google Scholar
  14. Brownmiller, S. (1975) Against Our Will: Men,Women and Rape. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  15. Burgess, A.W. (1987) “Public Beliefs and Attitudes Concerning Rape”, in Hazelwood, R.R. and Burgess, A.W. (eds.), Practical Rape Investigation: A Multidisciplinary Approach. New York, NY: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  16. Burt, M.R. (1980) “Cultural Myths and Support for Rape”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 38: 217-230.Google Scholar
  17. Burt, M.R. and Albin, R.S. (1981) “Rape Myths, Rape Definitions, and Probability of Conviction”, Journal of Applied Social Psychology 11: 212-230.Google Scholar
  18. Calhoun, K.S., Atkeson, B.M. and Resick, P.A. (1982) “A Longitudinal Examination of Fear Reaction in Victims of Rape”, Journal of Counselling Psychology 29: 655-661.Google Scholar
  19. Carson, L. and MacLeod, M.D. (1994) “Sexual Stereotyping in the Sock: Observations on the APA Amicus Curiae Brief Prepared in the Case of Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins”, Feminism and Psychology 4: 483-486.Google Scholar
  20. Carson, L. and MacLeod, M.D. (1997) Explanations about Crime and Psychological Distress in Ethnic Minority and White Victims of Crime: A Qualitative Exploration”, Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology 7: 361-375.Google Scholar
  21. Chambers, G. and Millar, A. (1983) Investigating Sexual Assaults. Edinburgh: HMSO.Google Scholar
  22. Chambers, G. and Millar, A. (1986) Prosecuting Sexual Assault. Edinburgh: HMSO.Google Scholar
  23. Chambers, G. and Tombs, J. (1984) The British Crime Survey Scotland. Edinburgh: HMSO.Google Scholar
  24. Check, J.V.P. and Malamuth, N. (1985) “An Empirical Assessment of Some Feminist Hypotheses about Rape”, International Journal of Women's Studies 8: 414-423Google Scholar
  25. Costin, F. (1985) “Beliefs about Rape and Women's Social Roles”, Archives of Sexual Behaviour 14: 319-325Google Scholar
  26. Cowan, G. and Curtis, S.R. (1994) “Predictors of Rape Occurrebnce and Victim Blame in the William Kennedy Smith Case”, Journal of Applied Social Psychology 24: 12-20.Google Scholar
  27. Darley, J.M. and Gross, P.H. (1983) “A Hypothesis-confirming Bias in Labeling Effects”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 44: 20-33.Google Scholar
  28. Devine, P.G. (1989) “Stereotypes and Prejudice: Their Automatic and Controlled Components”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56: 5-18.Google Scholar
  29. Doyle, G. (1994) “Child Sexual Abuse — Looking in the Wrong Direction”, British Journal of Psychiatry 165: 405.Google Scholar
  30. Federal Bureau of Investigation (1992) Uniform Crime Reports: Crime in the United States, 1991.Google Scholar
  31. Feild, H.S. (1978) “Attitudes towards Rape: A Comparative Analysis of Police, Rapists, Crisis Counsellors and Citizens”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36: 156-179.Google Scholar
  32. Fischer, G.J. (1987) “Hispanic and Majority Student Attitudes toward Forcible Date Rape as a Function of Differences in Attitudes toward Women”, Sex Roles: A Journal of Research 17: 93-101.Google Scholar
  33. Goodchilds, J., Zellman, G., Johnson, P.B. and Giarrusso, R. (1988) “Adolescents and Their Perceptions of Sexual Interactions”, in Burgess (ed.), Rape and Sexual Assault.Google Scholar
  34. Grace, S., Lloyd, C. and Smith, L.J.F. (1992) Rape from Recording to Conviction. Home Office Research and Planning Unit Paper 71, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  35. Griffin, S. (1971) Rape: The All-American Crime. Ramparts, September, 25-35.Google Scholar
  36. Hall, E.R., Howards, J.A. and Boezio, S.L. (1986) “Tolerance of Rape: A Sexist or Antisocial Attitude?”, Psychology of Women Quarterly 10: 101-108.Google Scholar
  37. Hall, R. (1985) Ask Any Woman. UK: Falling Wall Press.Google Scholar
  38. Hazelwood, R.R. and Warren, J.D.S.W. (1990) “Rape: The Criminal Behaviour of the Serial Rapist”, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, February, 64-68.Google Scholar
  39. Henderson, S. (1997) Hidden Figures: The Edinburgh Womens Safety Survey. Edinburgh: City of Edinburgh Council.Google Scholar
  40. Herman, D. (1989) “The Rape Culture”, in J. Freeman (ed.), Women: A Feminist Perspective. Mountain View, CA: Hayfield Publishing.Google Scholar
  41. Hilberman, E. (1977) “Rape: A Crisis in Silence”, Psychiatric Opinion, September/October, 32-35.Google Scholar
  42. Himelein, M.J. (1995) “Risk Factors for Sexual Victimization in Dating: A Longitudinal Study of College Women”, Psychology of Women Quarterly 19: 31-48.Google Scholar
  43. Holmstrom, L.L. and Burgess, A.W. (1975) “Rape: The Victim and the Criminal Justice System”, International Journal of Criminology and Penology 3(2): 101-110.Google Scholar
  44. Home Office (1994) Criminal Statistics, England and Wales. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  45. Katz, S. and Mazur, M. (1979) Understanding Rape Victims. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  46. Kirkpatrick, C. and Kanin, E. (1957) “Male Sexual Aggression on a University Campus”, American Sociological Review 22: 52-58.Google Scholar
  47. Kilpatrick, D.G., Edmunds, C.N. and Seymour, A. (1992) Rape in America: A Report to the Nation. Arlington, VA: National Victim Center.Google Scholar
  48. Kilpatrick D.G., Veronen, L.J. and Resnick, P.A. (1979) “Assessment of the Aftermath of Rape: Changing Patterns of Fear”, Journal of Behavioural Assessment 1: 133-148.Google Scholar
  49. Klemmack S.H. and Klemmack, D.L. (1976) “The Social Definition of Rape”, in M. Walker and S. Brodsky (eds.), Sexual Assault: The Victim and the Rapist. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.Google Scholar
  50. Koppelaar, L., Lange, A. and van de Velde, J-W (1997) “The Influence of Positive and Negative Victim Credibility on the Assessment of Rape Victims: An Experimental Study of the Expectancy-confirmation Bias”, International Review of Victimology 5: 61-85.Google Scholar
  51. Koss, M.P. (1985) “The Hidden Rape Victim: Personality, Attitudinal and Situational Characteristics”, Psychology of Women Quarterly 9: 193-212.Google Scholar
  52. Koss, M.P., Dinero, T.E., Seibel, C. and Cox, S. (1988) “Stranger, Acquaintance, and Date Rape: Is There a Difference in the Victim's Experience?”, Psychology of Women Quarterly 12: 1-24.Google Scholar
  53. Koss, M.P. and Harvey, M.R. (1991) The Rape Victim: Clinical and Community Interventions, 2nd Edition. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  54. Krahe, B. (1991) “Police Officers' Definitions of Rape: A Prototype Study”, Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology 1: 223-244.Google Scholar
  55. Lees, S. and Gregory, J. (1993) Rape and Sexual Assault: A Study of Attrition. Islington: Islington Council.Google Scholar
  56. Leyens, J., Yzerbyt, V. and Schadron, G. (1994) Stereotypes and Social Cognition. London: Sage Press.Google Scholar
  57. Lloyd, D.W. (1991) “Ritual Child Abuse: Understanding the Controversies”, Cultic Studies Journal 8: 122-133.Google Scholar
  58. Lonsway, K.A. and Fitzgerald, L.F. (1994) “Rape Myths: In Review”, Psychology of Women Quarterly 18: 133-164.Google Scholar
  59. MacKinnon, C.A. (1979) Sexual Harassment of Working Women: A Case of Sex Discrimination. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Macrae, C.N., Milne, A.B. and Bodenhausen, G.V. (1994) “Stereotypes as Energy Saving Devices: A Peek Inside the Cognitive Toolbox”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66: 37-47.Google Scholar
  61. Malamuth, N.M. (1981) “Rape Proclivity among Males”, Journal of Social Issues 37: 138-157.Google Scholar
  62. Malamuth, N.M. (1986) “Predictors of Naturalistic Sexual Aggression”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 5: 953-962.Google Scholar
  63. Malamuth, N.M. (1988) “Predicting Laboratory Aggression Against Male v. Female Targets: Implications for Research on Aggression”, Journal of Research in Personality 33: 474-495.Google Scholar
  64. Malamuth, N.M. and Ceniti, J. (1986) “Repeated Exposure to Violent and Nonviolent Pornography: Likelihood of Raping Ratings and Laboratory Aggression Against Women”, Aggressive Behavior 12: 129-137.Google Scholar
  65. Marshall, P. (1997) The Prevalence of Convictions for Sexual Offending. Research Findings no. 55. London: Home Office Research and Statistics Directorate.Google Scholar
  66. Marshall, W.L., Christie, M.M. and Lanthier, R.D. (1979) “Social Competence, Sexual Experience and Attitudes to Sex in Incarcerated Rapists and Pedophiles. Report to Solicitor General in Canada”, in W.L. Marshall, D.R. Laws and H.E. Barbaree (eds.), Handbook of Sexual Assault: Issues, Theories and Treatment of the Offender. London: Plenum.Google Scholar
  67. Mayall, A. and Gold, S.R. (1995) “Definitional Issues and Mediating Variables in the Sexual Revictimization of Women Sexually Abused as Children”, Journal of Interpersonal Violence 10: 26-42.Google Scholar
  68. Mennen, F.E. and Meadow, D. (1995) “The Relationship of Abuse Characteristics to Symptoms in Sexually Abused Girls”, Journal of Interpersonal Violence 10: 259-274.Google Scholar
  69. Mosher, D.L. and Anderson, R.D. (1986) “Macho Personality, Sexual Aggression, and Reactions to Guided Imagery of Realistic Rape”, Journal of Research in Personality 20: 77-94.Google Scholar
  70. Muehlenhard, C.L., Friedman, D.E. and Thomas, C.M. (1985) “Is Date Rape Justifiable? The Effects of Dating Activity, Who Initiated, Who Paid, and Men's Attitudes toward Women”, Psychology of Women Quarterly 9: 297-310.Google Scholar
  71. Muehlenhard, C.L., and Linton, MA. (1987) “Date Rape and Sexual Aggression in Dating Situations: Incidence and Risk Factors”, Journal of Counselling and Psychology 14: 186-19.Google Scholar
  72. Muir, G., Lonsway, K.A. and Payne, D.L. (1996) “Rape Myth Acceptance among Scottish and American Students”, The Journal of Social Psychology 136: 261-262.Google Scholar
  73. Overholster, J.C. and Beck, S. (1986) “Multimethod Assessment of Rapists, Child Molesters, and Three Control Groups on Behavioral and Psychological Measures”, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 56: 682-687.Google Scholar
  74. Payne, D. (1992) Crime in Scotland: Findings from the 1988 British Crime Survey. Edinburgh: Scottish Office.Google Scholar
  75. Pennington, N. and Hastie, R. (1990) “Practical Implications of Psychological Research on Juror and Jury Decision Making”, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 16: 90-105.Google Scholar
  76. Rapaport, K.R. and Burkhart, B.R. (1984) “Personality and Attitudinal Characteristics of Coercive College Males”, Journal of Abnormal Psychology 93: 216-221.Google Scholar
  77. Resnick, H.S., Kilpatrick, D.G., Dansky, B.S., Saunders, B.E. and Best, C.L. (1993) “Prevalence of Civilian Trauma and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in a Representative National Sample of Women”, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 61: 984-991.Google Scholar
  78. Robin, G.D. (1977) “Forcible Rape: Institutional Sexism in the Criminal Justice System”, Crime and Delinquency 23: 136-153.Google Scholar
  79. Rodabaugh, B. and Austin, M. (1981) Sexual Assault. New York, NY: Garland Press.Google Scholar
  80. Russell, D.E.H. (1982) Rape in Marriage. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  81. Russell, D.E.H. (1984). Sexual Exploitation: Rape, Child Sexual Abuse, and Workplace Harassment. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  82. Russell, D.E.H. (1990) Rape in Marriage, 2nd ed. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  83. Saks, M.J. (1993) “Improving APA Science Translation Amicus Briefs”, Law and Human Behavior 17: 235-247.Google Scholar
  84. Schneider, B.E. (1993) “Put up and Shut up: Workplace Sexual Assault”, in P.B. Bart and E.G. Moran (eds.), Violence Against Women: The Bloody Footprints. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 57-72.Google Scholar
  85. Schwendinger J. and Schwendinger, H. (1974) “Rape Myths in Legal, Theoretical and Everyday Practice”, Crime and Social Justice 1: 18-26.Google Scholar
  86. Scully, D. (1990) Understanding Sexual Violence: A Study of Convicted Rapists. London: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  87. Sheffield, C.J. (1993) “The Invisible Intruder: Women's Experiences of Obscene Phone Calls”, in P.B. Bart and E.G. Morgan (eds.), Violence Against Women: The Bloody Footprints. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  88. Shotland, R.L. (1989) “A Model of the Causes of Date Rape in Developing and Close Relationships”, in C. Hendrick (ed.), Close Relationships. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 247-270.Google Scholar
  89. Sheldon, D.H. and MacLeod, M.D. (1991) “From Normative to Positive Data: Expert Evidence Re-examined”, Criminal Law Review Nov: 811-820.Google Scholar
  90. Silverman, D. (1976) “Sexual Harassment: WorkingWomen's Dilemma”, Quest: A Feminist Quarterly 10: 346-357.Google Scholar
  91. Smith, L.J.F. (1989) Concerns about Rape. Home Office Research Study, 106, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  92. Smith, M. (1993) Ritual Abuse: What it is, Why it Happens, How to Help. San Francisco: Harper.Google Scholar
  93. Stermac, L.E. and Quinsey, V.L. (1986) “Social Competence amongst Rapists”, Behavioural Assessment 8: 171-185.Google Scholar
  94. Tetreault, P.A. and Barnett, M.A. (1987) “Reactions to Stranger and Acquaintance Rape”, Psychology of Women Quarterly 11: 353-358.Google Scholar
  95. The Scottish Office (1993) Statistical Bulletin: Recorded Crime in Scotland, 1992. Edinburgh: HMSO.Google Scholar
  96. Thornton, B., Ryckman, R.M. and Robbins, M.A. (1982) “The Relationship of Observer Characteristics to Beliefs in Causal Responsibility of Victims of Sexual Assault”, Human Relations 35: 321-330.Google Scholar
  97. Ullman, S.E. and Siegel, J.M. (1993) “Victim-offender Relationship and Sexual Assault”, Violence and Victims 8: 121-134.Google Scholar
  98. United States Merit Systems Protection Board (1981) Sexual Harassment in the Federal Workplace: Is it a Problem? Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  99. United States Senate Judiciary Committee (1993) The Response to Rape: Detours on the Road to Equal Justice. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  100. Ward, C.A. (1995) Attitudes toward Rape: Feminist and Social Psychological Perspectives. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  101. Ward, C. and Inserto, F. (1990) Victims of Sexual Violence: A Handbook for Helpers. Singapore: Singapore University Press.Google Scholar
  102. Ward, C., Newlon, B., Krahe, B., Myambo, K., Payne, M., Tastan, Y., Yuksel, S., Ghadially, R., Kumar, U., Lee, H.B., Cheung, F. M., Upadhyaha, S., Patnoe, J.M Kirby, C., Vasquez Gomez, A., Parra, E. and Colosio, C. (1988) “The Attitudes Toward Rape Victims Scale: Psychometric Data from 14 Countries”, Social and Behavioral Sciences Documents 18(2877).Google Scholar
  103. Warshaw, R. (1988) I Never Called it Rape. New York, NY: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  104. Watson, L. (1996) Victims of Violent Crime Recorded by the Police, England and Wales 1990–94. Home Office Statistical Issue 1/96. London: Home Office research and Statistics Directorate.Google Scholar
  105. Willis, C.E. (1992) “The Effect of Sex Role Stereotypes, victim and Defendant Race, and Prior Relationship on Rape Culpability Attributions”, Sex Roles 26: 213-226.Google Scholar
  106. Winkel, F.W. and Vrij, A (1993) “Rape Reporting to the Police: Exploring the Social Psychological Impact of a Persuasive Campaign on Cognitions, Attitudes, Normative Expectations and Reporting Intentions”, International Review of Victimology 2: 277-294.Google Scholar
  107. Wood, L.A. and Rennie, H. (1994) “Formulating Rape: The Discursive Construction of Victims and Villains”, Discourse and Society: 125-148.Google Scholar
  108. Wood, P.L. (1973) “The Victim in a Forcible Rape Case: A Feminist View”, American Criminology 24: 399-400.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katherine E. Edward
    • 1
  • Malcolm D. MacLeod
    • 2
  1. 1.Canterbury Christ Church University CollegeUSA
  2. 2.School of PsychologyUniversity of St. Andrews,St. AndrewsFifeUK

Personalised recommendations