Abstract
This paper surveys different economic aspects of biodiversity conservation in Namibia's wildlife sector. One of the main causes of biodiversity loss has been the conversion of wildlife habitat to other land uses, notably livestock and crops. However, wildlife utilization strategies potentially yield significantly higher economic rates of return compared to these traditional land uses. Historically, the move towards land use patterns more favourable to wildlife has been hampered by a number of policy and institutional constraints. Since Namibia's independence, many of these constraints have now been removed or are in the process of reform. These moves are already encouraging investment in wildlife utilization, most notably in wildlife tourism and related activities. Some forms of wildlife utilization, particularly ecotourism and photographic safaris, will certainly complement the national and international commitment to biodiversity conservation. Consumptive uses may be economically attractive in some areas and will discourage further habitat conversion. However, uses which involve specialized management for the production of a few species may alter the species composition and functioning of ecosystems, causing conflict between the aims of wildlife utilization and biodiversity conservation. Less tangible components of biodiversity may remain under threat even under a well-designed wildlife utilization policy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ashley, C. (1996) Incentives affecting biodiversity conservation and sustainable use: the case of land use options in Namibia. DEA Research Discussion Paper 13, 1–21. Windhoek: Directorate of Environmental Affairs.
Ashley, C. and Barnes, J.I. (1996) Wildlife use for economic gain: the potential for wildlife to contribute to development in Namibia. DEA Research Discussion Paper 12, 1–23. Windhoek: Directorate of Environmental Affairs.
Ashley, C., Barnes, J.I. and Healy, T. (1994) Profits, equity, growth and sustainability: the potential role of wildlife enterprises in Caprivi and other communal areas of Namibia. DEA Research Discussion Paper 2, 1–26. Windhoek: Directorate of Environmental Affairs.
Barnard, P., Brown, C.J., Jarvis, A.M., Robertson, A. and van Rooyen, L. (1998) Extending the Namibian protected area network to safeguard hotspots of endemism and diversity. Biodiv. Conserv. 7, 531.
Barnes, J.I. (1995a) The value of non-agricultural land use in some Namibian communal areas: a data base for planning. DEA Research Discussion Paper 6, 1–19 + appendix. Windhoek: Directorate of Environmental Affairs.
Barnes, J.I. (1995b) Current and potential use values for natural resources in some Namibian communal areas: a planning tool. Unpublished working document. Windhoek: Directorate of Environmental Affairs. 60 pp.
Barnes, J.I. and de Jager, J.L.V. (1996) Economic and financial incentives for wildlife use on private land in Namibia and the implications for policy. S. Afr. J. Wildl. Res. 26, 37–46.
Barnes, J.I. and Schier, C. and van Rooy, G. (1997) Tourists’ willingness to pay for wildlife viewing and wildlife conservation in Namibia. DEA Research Discussion Paper 15, 1–24. Windhoek: Directorate of Environmental Affairs.
Brown, C.J. (1988) African raptors on farmlands: what is their future? Afr. Wildl. 42, 103–5.
Brown, G. and Henry, W. (1989) The economic value of elephants. LEEC Paper 89-12. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.
Cumming, D.H.M. (1995) Communal land development and wildlife utilisation: potential and options in northern Namibia. Unpublished working document. Harare: WWF Multispecies Animal Production Systems Project.
Hoff and Overgaard Ltd. (1993) Volume and value of tourism in Namibia-present and future trends. Paper presented at National Tourism Symposium, 9-10 February 1994, Windhoek.
Jones, B.T.B. (1995) Wildlife management, utilization and tourism in communal areas: benefits to communities and improved resource management. DEA Research Discussion Paper 5, 1–19 + appendices. Windhoek: Directorate of Environmental Affairs.
Lindeque, M., Brown, C.J., du Plessis, W., Griffin, M., Jones, B. and Coetzee, H. (1991) Preliminary biological survey of the Owambo region. Internal report. Windhoek: Ministry of Wildlife, Conservation and Tourism.
Luxmoore, R. and Swanson, T.M. (1992) Wildlife and wildland utilization and conservation. In Economics for the Wilds: Wildlife, Wildlands, Diversity and Development (T. Swanson and E. Barbier, eds) pp. 170–194. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd.
Nowell, K. (1996) Namibian cheetah conservation strategy. Draft report. Windhoek: Ministry of Environment and Tourism.
Pearce, D., Brown, K., Swanson, T. and Perrings, C. (1993) Economics and the conservation of global biological diversity. Report to the Global Environmental Facility. London: Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment, University College London.
Richardson, J. (1997) The economics of biodiversity conservation in Namibia. In Biological Diversity in Namibia: a Country Study (P. Barnard, ed.). Windhoek: Ministry of Environment and Tourism/National Biodiversity Task Force (in press).
Swanson, T. and Barbier, E. (1992) Economics for the Wilds: Wildlife, Wildlands, Diversity and Development. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd.
UNEP (1994) Global Biodiversity Assessment, 8. Economic Values of Biodiversity. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme.
Western, D. (1989) The ecological value of elephants: a keystone role in African ecosystems. In The Ivory Trade and the Future of the African Elephant (ITRG). Report prepared for Second Meeting of the CITES African Elephant Working Group, July 1989, Gaborone, Botswana.
Yaron, G., Healy, T. and Tapscott, C. (1994) The economics of wildlife in Namibia. In The Economics of Wildlife (J. Bojö, ed.) pp. 49–86. Washington: Environmentally Sustainable Development Division, Technical Department, Africa Region, The World Bank.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Richardson, J.a. Wildlife utilization and biodiversity conservation in Namibia: conflicting or complementaryobjectives?. Biodiversity and Conservation 7, 549–559 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008883813644
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008883813644