Randomized trials of reperfusion therapy completed over the past decade have engendered the open-artery hypothesis. Collectively, patients with patent infarct-related arteries have fewer complications of their myocardial infarction, salutary effects on ventricular remodeling, and better survival. Thrombolytic therapy has been widely regarded as the most appropriate initial therapy for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), particularly in the community setting. At institutions with the appropriate resources and expertise, primary angioplasty may be the treatment of choice for patients with AMI presenting within 6 hours. Mechanical reperfusion strategies such as angioplasty are quite effective and may be more appropriate for selected patient populations, such as those in cardiogenic shock or who have compelling contraindications to thrombolytic therapy. For these patients, timely mechanical reperfusion can lead to prompt hemodynamic stability and significant improvement in prognosis. Balloon angioplasty, and to a lesser extent other mechanical interventions, are effective therapy for patients with failed thrombolysis or recurrent spontaneous ischemia after initial reperfusion therapy. Elective mechanical revascularization after AMI can be performed with a high degree of success, a low rate of complication, and a good long-term outcome, but there are no compelling data to support routine angioplasty, ostensibly to create an "open artery", for patients with clinical reperfusion and no spontaneous or inducible ischemia. Finally, all interventions, whether chemical or mechanical, will be required to be cost effective as well as clinically effective. As we move to a managed care environment in the latter half of this decade, value will replace technology as the prominent influence in American medicine.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Braunwald E. Myocardial reperfusion, limitation of infarct size, reduction of left ventricular dysfunction and improved survival. Should the paradigm be expanded? Circulation 1988;79:441–444.
Kennedy JW, Richie JL, Davis KB, et al. The Western Washington Randomized Trial of intracoronary streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction: A 12 month followup report. N Engl J Med 1985;312:1073–1078.
Flygenring BP, Althouse RG, Sheehan FH, et al. Does vessel patency at the time of hospital discharge following thrombolytic therapy predict survival? (abstr). J. Am Coll Cardiol 1990;15:202A.
Hartzler GO, Rutherford BD, McConahay DR, et al. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty with and without thrombolytic therapy for treatment of acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 1983;106:965–973.
DeWood MA, Spores J, Notske R, et al. Prevalence of total coronary occlusion during the early hours of transmural myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1980;303:897–902.
TIMI Research Group. Immediate vs. delayed catheterization and angioplasty following thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. JAMA 1988;260:2849–2858.
Weaver WD, Litwin PE, Martin JS, et al. Use of direct angioplasty for treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction in hospitals with and without on-site cardiac surgery. Circulation 1993;88:2067–2075.
Ryan TJ, Bauman WB, Kennedy JW, et al. Guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;22:2033–2054.
Topol EJ, Bates ER, Walton JA, et al. Community hospital administration of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator in acute myocardial infarction: Improved timing, thrombolytic efficacy and ventricular function. J Am Coll Cardiol 1987;10:1173–1177.
Califf RM, Topol EJ, Stack RS, et al. Evaluation of combination thrombolytic therapy and timing of catheterization in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1991;83:1543–1556.
Eckman MH, Wong JB, Salem DN, et al., Direct angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. Ann Intern Med 1992;117:667–676.
Grines CL, Browne KF, Marco J, et al. A comparison of immediate angioplasty with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1993;328:673–679.
Stone GW, Grines CL, Browne KF, et al. Predictors of in-hospital and 6-month outcome after acute myocardial infarction in the reperfusion era: The Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;25:370–377.
Ellis SG, Ribeiro-Silva E, Heyndrickx GR, et al. Final results of the randomized RESOUE study evaluating PTCA after failed thrombolysis for anterior infarction (abstr). Circulation 1993;88:1–106.
Ellis SG, da Werf FV, Ribeiro-daSilva E, et al. Present status of rescue coronary angioplasty: Current polarization of opinion and randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;19:681–686.
Zijlstra F, Boer MJD, Hoorntje JCA, et al. A comparison of immediate coronary angioplasty with intravenous streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1993;328:680–684.
Gibbons RJ, Holmes DR, Reeder GS, et al. Immediate angioplasty compared with the administration of a thrombolytic agent followed by conservative treatment for myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1993;328:685–691.
Meijer A, Verheugt FW, Werter CJ, et al. Aspirin versus coumadin in the prevention of reocclusion and recurrent ischemia after successful thrombolysis: A prospective placebo-controlled angiographic study. Circulation 1993;87:1524–1530.
Ohman EM, Califf RM, Topol EJ, et al. Consequences of reocclusion after successful reperfusion therapy in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1990;82:781–791.
Goldberg RJ, Gore JM, Alpert JS. Cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction. Incidence and mortality from a community wide perspective. N Engl J Med 1991;325:1117–1122.
Gacioch GM, Ellis SG, Lee L, et al. Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: The use of coronary angioplasty and integration of the new support devices into patient management. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;19:647–653.
Califf RM, Topol EJ, BS George, et al. Characteristics and outcome of patients in whom reperfusion with intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator fails: Results of the Thrombolysis and Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (TAMI) trial. Circulation 1988;77:1090–1099.
Fung AY, Lai P, Topol EJ, et al. Value of percutaneous transluminal coronaryangioplasty after unsuccessful intravenous streptokinase therapy in acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1986;58:686–691.
Abbottsmith CW, Topol EJ, George BS, et al. Fate of patients with acute myocardial infarction with patency of the infarct-related vessel achieved with successful thrombolysis versus rescue angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990;16:770–778.
Muller D, WE, Topol J. Selection of patients with acute myocardial infarction for thrombolytic therapy. Ann Intern Med 1990;113:949–960.
Topol EJ, Califf RM, Vandormael M, et al. A randomized trial of late reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1992;85:2090–2099.
Granger CB, Califf RM, Topol EJ. Thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Drugs 1992;44:293–325.
GUSTO Angiographic Investigators. The effects of tissue plasminogen activator, streptokinase, or both on coronary artery patency, ventricular function and survival after acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1993;329:1615–1622.
TIMI Study Group. Comparison of invasive and conservative strategies following intravenous tissue plasminogen activator in acute myocardial infarction: Results of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI)-II trial. N Engl J Med 1989;320:618–628.
Chaitman BR, Thompson BW, Kern MJ, et al. Tissue plasminogen activator followed by percutanous transluminal coronary angioplasty: One year TIMI phase II pilot results. Am Heart J 1990;119:213–221.
SWIFT Study Group, Trial of delayed elective intervention versus conservative treatment after thrombolysis with anistreplase in acute myocardial infarction. Br Med J 1991;302:555–560.
Mueller HS, Cohen LS, Braunwald E, et al. Predictors of early morbidity and mortality after thrombolytic therapy of acute myocardial infarction: Analysis of patient subgroups in the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) trial-phase II. Circulation 1992;85:1254–1264.
Leung W, HC, Lau P. Effects of severity of residual stenosis of the infarct-related coronary artery on left ventricular dilatation and function after acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;20:307–313.
EPIC Investigators. Prevention of ischemic complications in high risk angioplasty by a chimeric monclonal antibody 7E3 Fab fragment directed against the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor. N Engl J Med 1994;330:956–961.
Topol EJ, Califf RM, Weisman HF, et al. Randomized trial of coronary intervention with antibody against platelet IIb/IIIa integrin for reduction of clinical restenosis: Results at six months. Lancet 1994;343:881–886.
Topol EJ, Burek K, O'Neill WW. A randomized trial of hospital discharge three days after myocardial infarction in the era of reperfusion. N Engl J Med 1988;318:1083–1088.
About this article
Cite this article
Smith, J.J. Invasive Strategies to Achieve Infarct-Related Artery Patency. J Thromb Thrombolysis 4, 217–225 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008874300564
- myocardial infarction
- open artery hypothesis