Abstract
This article focuses on one way to study technology, through technological problem solving situated in real-life contexts. In problem solving for real-life contexts, design processes are seen as creative, dynamic and iterative processes that engage exploration; join conceptual and procedural knowledge-both thought and action; and can encourage considerations to technology, human and environmental interactions. This approach is a demarcation from what is typically found in schools; design, make and appraise cycles based on closed design briefs that are teacher assigned and unrelated to the students' world. An interpretation of technology education as problem solving for real-life contexts using design processes as tools for creation and exploration offers an alternative approach to design in technology education. Alternative curriculum and instruction then emerge. Elementary and secondary school programs in technology education and teacher education can all be seen through this kind of design lens. Episodes from case studies are reported with the intent to briefly describe technology education programs in elementary and secondary schools that interpret technology education in this way. Educational implications of this approach are offered.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Anning, A., Jenkins, E. & Whitelaw, S.: 1996, Bodies of Knowledge and Design-based Activities: A Report to the Design Council, The University of Leeds, Leeds.
Beakley, G. C.: 1975, Introduction to Engineering Graphics, MacMillan, New York.
Cross, N.: 1983, Design: Processes and Products Course Units, Open University Press, Buckingham.
Dewey, J.: 1977, Experience and Education (20th printing), MacMillan Collier, New York.
Dunn, S. & Larson, R.: 1990, Design Technology: Children’s Engineering, The Falmer Press, Lewes.
Eggleston, J.: 1992, Teaching Design and Technology, Open University Press, Buckingham.
Ferguson, E. S.: 1993, Engineering and the Mind’s Eye, The MIT Press, Cambridge.
Franklin, U.: 1990, The Real World of Technology, Anansi Press, Toronto, ON.
Friesen, D.: 1997, ‘Exploring Self-Study from a Postmodern Perspective’. Paper presented to the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 24-25 March, Chicago, IL.
Gardner, H.: 1983, The Theory of Multiple Intelligences, Basic Books, New York.
Gardner, H.: 1993, Multiple Intelligences: The Theory in Practice, Basic Books, New York.
Hill, A. M.: 1994a, ‘Perspectives on Philosophical Shifts in Vocational Education: From Realism to Pragmatism and Reconstructionism’, Journal of Vocational and Technical Education 10(2), 37-45.
Hill, A. M.: 1994b, ‘Technology in the Elementary School’, MSTE News 4(1), 1-4.
Hill, A. M.: 1994c, ‘Technology in the Elementary School’, Technology Teacher 55(5), 19-23.
Hill, A. M.: 1997, ‘Reconstructionism in Technology Education’, International Journal of Technology and Design Education 7(1-2), 121-139.
Hill, A. M. & Hopkins, R.: 1997, ‘Two Paths Converge: A Story of University and School Collaboration in Teacher Education’. Paper presented to the International Study Association on Teacher and Teacher Thinking (ISATT), 8th Annual Conference, 1-5 October, Kiel, Germany.
Hill, A. M. & Smith, H. A.: 1996, ‘The Evolution of an Exemplary Secondary School Program in Technological Education: An Ontario Perspective’. Paper presented to the 8th Symposium of the International Organization of Science and Technology Education (IOSTE), 17-24 August, Edmonton, AB.
Hill, A. M. & Smith, H. A.: 1997, ‘Bringing Classroom Design and Community-based Projects Together: Attributes of an Innovative Technology Education Program’. Paper presented to the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 24-25 March, Chicago, IL.
Jenkins, E.: 1993, ‘Knowledge and Action: Science as Technology?’, in R. McCormick, P. Murphy & M. Harrison (eds.), Teaching and Learning Technology, Addison-Wesley for The Open University Press, Wokingham, pp. 3-14.
Jones, A.: 1997, ‘Recent Research In Learning Technological Concepts and Processes’, International Journal of Technology and Design Education 7(1-2), 83-96.
Jones, A.: 1997, Know How 2, Video Modules, Copeland Wilson, Wellington.
Jones, A. & Carr, A.: 1994, ‘Students Technological Capability: Where Do We Start?’, SAME papers 1994, 165-186.
Jones, A., Mather, V. & Carr, A.: 1995, Issues in the Practice of Technology Education, Centre for Science and Mathematics Education Research, University of Waikato, Hamilton.
Kimbell, R.: 1986, Craft Design & Technology, The Open University Press, Milton Keynes.
Lave, J.: 1988, Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics and Culture in Everyday Life, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Lave, J.: 1991, ‘Situated Learning in Communities of Practice’, in L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine & S. D. Teasley (eds.), Shared Cognition: Thinking as Social Practice, Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
Lawson, B.: 1990, How Designers Think, Butterworth Architecture, London.
Layton, D.: 1993, ‘Science Education as Praxis’, in R. McCormick, P. Murphy & M. Harrison (eds.), Teaching and Learning Technology, Addison-Wesley for The Open University Press, Wokingham, pp. 3-14.
McCormick, R.: 1997, ‘Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge’, International Journal of Technology and Design Education 7(1-2), 141-159.
McCormick, R., Murphy, P. & Hennessy, S.: 1994, ‘Problem Solving Processes in Technology Education: A Pilot Study’, International Journal of Technology and Design Education 4(1), 5-34.
McCormick, R., Murphy, P., Hennessy, S. & Davidson, M.: 1996a, ‘Research on Student Learning of Designing and Problem Solving in Technology Activity in Schools in England’. Paper presented to the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 8-12 April, New York.
McCormick, R., Murphy, P., Hennessy, S. & Davidson, M.: 1996b, ‘Problem Solving in Science and Technology’. Paper presented to the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 8-12 April, New York.
Milgram, R. A.: 1990, ‘Creativity: An Idea Whose Time Has Come and Gone?’, in M. Runco & R. Albert (eds.), Theories of Creativity, Sage Publications, London, pp. 215-233.
Miller, M. D.: 1985, Principles and Philosophy for Vocational Education, The Ohio State University, The National Center for Research in Vocational Education, Columbus, OH.
Norman, E., Riley, J., Urry, S. & Whittaker, M.: 1990, Advanced Design and Technology, Longman, Essex.
Ontario Ministry of Education and Training: 1995, The Common Curriculum, Queen’s Printer, Toronto, ON.
Ontario Ministry of Education and Training: 1995, Broad-based Technological Education, Queen’s Printer, Toronto, ON.
Raizen S. A., Sellwood, P. Todd, R. D. & Vickers, M.: 1995, Technology Education in the Classroom: Understanding the Designed World, Jossey Bass Publishers, San Francisco.
Runco, M. & Albert, R.: 1990, Theories of Creativity, Sage Publications, London.
Taylor, C.: 1991, ‘The Dialogical Self’, in D. R. Hiley, J. F. Bohman & R. Shusterman (eds.), The Interpretive Turn: Philosophy, Science, Culture, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, pp. 304-314.
Taylor, I.: 1975, ‘An Emerging View of Creative Actions’, in I. Taylor & J. V. Getzels (eds.), Perspectives in Creativity, Aldine, Chicago, pp. 297-325.
Tickle, L.: 1990, Design and Technology in Primary School Classrooms: Developing Teachers’ Perspectives and Practices, The Falmer Press, Lewes.
Waetjen, W. B.: 1995, ‘Technology and the Humanities’, in G. E. Martin (ed.), Foundations of Technology Education, 44th Yearbook, Council of Technology Teacher Education, Glencoe/McGraw/Hill, Peoria, IL.
Walker, D. & Cross, N.: 1983, An Introduction to Design, Open University Press, Buckingham.
Wallas, G.: 1926, The Art of Thought, Harcourt, Brace and Co., New York.
Wallas, G.: 1973, ‘The Art of Thought’, in P. E. Vernon (ed.), Creativity: Selected Readings, Penguin, Harmondsworth, pp. 91-97.
Wiener, N.: 1993, Invention: The Care and Feeding of Ideas, The MIT Press, Cambridge.
Williams, P. H. M.: 1990, Teaching Craft, Design and Technology: Five to Thirteen, Routledge, London.
Yin, R. K.: 1994, Case Study Research: Design and Methods (2nd ed.), Sage, Thousand Oaks.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hill, A.M. Problem Solving in Real-Life Contexts: An Alternative for Design in Technology Education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 8, 203–220 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008854926028
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008854926028