Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Health-related quality of life following liver transplantation

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to report on the health-related quality of life (QoL) experienced by patients following liver transplantation and to investigate the factors associated with its variation. A questionnaire comprising the SF-36 and EuroQol EQ-5D instruments was sent by post to 147 patients who had received a liver transplant, indicated by a chronic liver disease, in the previous 8 years. The scores of the respondents were compared to population norm scores. The variation in both the SF-36 and EQ-5D scores was explored. Many liver transplant patients experienced most satisfactory QoL levels post- transplantation although, in general terms, the levels were poorer than those seen in the general population. The variation in the post-transplant health-related QoL scores was found to be associated with a number of pre-transplant factors: disease severity (proxied by Child Pugh class), disease duration at the time of transplantation and liver transplant history (whether the patient had received a single or multiple transplants). In making clinical decisions about the use of transplantation for chronic liver diseases, consideration should be given to the key factors likely to affect subsequent health-related QoL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lowe D, O'Grady JG, McEwen J, Williams R. Quality of life following liver transplantation: a preliminary report. J R Coll Physicians London 1990; 24(1): 43-46.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tarter RE, Switala J, Arria A, Van Thiel DH. Impact of liver disease on daily living in transplantation candidates. J Clin Epidemiol 1991; 44(10): 1079-1083.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bonsel GJ, Essink-Bot ML, Klompmaker IJ, Slooff MJ. Assessment of the quality of life before and following liver transplantation. First results. Transplantation 1992; 53(4): 796-800.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Foley TC, Davis CP, Conway PA. Liver transplant recipients — self report of symptom frequency, symptom distress, quality of life. Transplant Proc 1989; 21(1): 2417-2418.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hicks FD, Larson JL, Ferrans CE. Quality of life after liver transplant. Res Nursing Health 1992; 15: 111-119.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Robinson LR, Switala J, Tarter RE, Nicholas JJ. Functional outcome after liver transplantation: a preliminary report. Arch of Phys Med Rehab 1990; 71: 426-427.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tarter RE, van Thiel DH, Hegedus AM, Gavaler JS, Starz TE. Neuropsychiatric status after liver transplantation. J Lab Clin Med 1984; 103(5): 776-782.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Van Thiel DH, Tarter R, Gavaler JS, Potanko WM, Schade RR. Liver transplantation in adults. An analysis of costs and benefits at the University of Pittsburgh. Gastroenterology 1986; 90(1): 211-216.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wolcott D, Norquist G, Busutti R. Cognitive function and quality of life in adult liver transplant recipients. Transplant Proc 1989; 21(3): 3563.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tarter RE, Erb S, Biller PA, Switala J, Van Thiel DH. The quality of life following liver transplantation: a preliminary report. Gastroenterol Clin N Am 1988; 17(1): 207-217.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tarter RE, Switala J, Arria A, Plail J, van Thiel D. Quality of life before and after orthotopic hepatic transplantation. Arch Intern Med 1991; 15: 1521-1526.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nicholas JJ, Oleske D, Robinson LR, Switala JA, Tarter R. The quality of life after orthotopic liver transplantation: an analysis of 166 cases. Arch Phys Med Rehab 1994; 75(4): 431-435.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Levy MF, Jennings L, Abouljoud MS, Mulligan DC. Quality of life improvements at one, two, and five years after liver transplantation. Transplantation 1995; 59(4): 515-518.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Collis I, Burroughs A, Rolles K, Lloyd G. Psychiatric and social outcome of liver transplantation. Br J Psychiatr 1995; 166: 521-524.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Price CE, Lowe D, Cohen AT, Reid FDA, Forbes GM, McEwen J, Williams R. Prospective study of the quality of life in patients assessed for liver transplantation: outcome in transplanted and not transplanted groups. J R Soc of Med 1995; 88: 130-135.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Steiger MJ, Farrah T, Rolles K, Harvey P, Burroughs AK. Cyclosporin associated headache. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr, 1994; 57(10): 1258-1259.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gutkind L. Life after transplantation. Transplant Proc 1988; 20(Suppl 1): 1092-1099.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Knechtle SJ, Fleming MF, Barry KL, Steen D, Pirsch JD, D'Alessandro AM, Kalayoglu M, Belzer FO. Liver transplantation in alcoholics: assessment of psychological health and work activity. Transplant Proc 1993; 25(2): 1916-1918.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Brazier JE, Harper R, Jones NMB, O'Cathain A, Thomas KJ, Usherwood T, Westlake L. Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. BMJ 1992; 305: 160-164.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Garratt AM, Ruta DA, Abdalla MI, Buckingham JK, Russell IT. The SF36 health survey questionnaire: an outcome measure suitable for routine use within the NHS? BMJ 1993; 306: 1440-1444.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jenkinson C, Coulter A, Wright L. Short form 36 (SF36) health survey questionnaire: normative data for adults of working age. BMJ 1993; 306: 1437-1440.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hunt CM, Tart JS, Dowdy E, Bute BP, Willaims DM, Clavien PA. Effect of orthotopic liver transplantation on employment and health status. Liver Transplant Surg 1996; 2: 148-153.

    Google Scholar 

  23. MOS Trust. How to Score the MOS 36-item Short-form Health Survey (SF-36). Boston: MOS Trust Inc., 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  24. EuroQol Group. EuroQol — a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 1990; 20: 329-332.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Brooks R, EuroQol Group. EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy 1996: 37: 53-72.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Dolan P, Gudex C, Kind P, Williams A. A social tariff for EuroQuol: results from a UK general population survey. Centre for Health Economics Discussion Paper No. 138. York: University of York, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Alderson C, Wittenberg R. Health Status of British Adult Population by the EuroQol Instrument and Other Measures: Omnibus Sample Survey 1995. Paper presented at the Health Economists' Study Group Meeting, University of York, January 1996.

  28. SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 6, 4th edn. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc., 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Neuberger J, Lucey MR. Liver Transplantation: Practice and Management. London: BMJ, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Evans RW, Manninen DL, Dong FB, McLynne DA. Is retransplantation cost-effective? Transplant Proc 1993; 25: 1694-1696.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ubel PA, Loewenstein G. The efficacy and equity of retransplantation: an experimental survey of public attitudes. Health Policy 1995; 34: 145-151.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ubel PA, Loewenstein G. Distributing scarce livers: the moral reasoning of the general public. Soc Sci Med 1996; 42(7): 1049-1055.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bryan, S., Ratcliffe, J., Neuberger, J.M. et al. Health-related quality of life following liver transplantation. Qual Life Res 7, 115–120 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008849224815

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008849224815

Navigation