Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Health-related quality of life varies with personality types: a comparison among cancer patients, non-cancer patients and healthy individuals in a Japanese population

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In an attempt to examine differential effects of personality on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) without regard to disease type, we used the HRQoL-20, a general questionnaire (Japanese original scale) we developed (comprising 20 questions related to physiological, psychological or social HRQoL) and the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ), which measures personality traits of extraversion (E), neuroticism (N) and psychoticism (P). The subjects (399 males and 429 females), stomach cancer patients, non-cancer patients (who had received acupuncture or moxibustion treatment) and healthy controls, were classified into three personality types. The results indicated that the HRQoL score of the tolerable/tolerant type (high E, low N and high P scorers) was greater than the intolerable/intolerant type (low E, high N and low P scorers) and also the unclassified type (neither of above scorers). The HRQoL correlated positively with the E and P scales and negatively with the N scale, in the case of all subjects, with the exception of N in male cancer patients and E in male non-cancer patients. The results supported the hypothesis that the HRQoL varies with personality variables, in that each patient, in different treatment settings, strives for the situation that is congruent with his/her personality to attain a better HRQoL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aaronson NK, Bullinger M, Ahmedzai S. A modular approach to quality of life assessment in cancer clinical trials. Recent Res. Cancer Res 1988; III: 231-249.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yamaoka K, Hayashi F, Hayashi C, Shigehisa T, Watanabe M. Influence of personality on quality of life measurement. Jap J Health Psychol 1996; 9: 11-20 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item Short-form Health Survey (SF-36). 1. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30: 473-483.

    Google Scholar 

  4. The EuroQol Group. EuroQol — a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 1990; 16: 199-208.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yamaoka K, Hayashi F, Hayashi C, Misumi J, Takezawa S, Maeda M, et al. A Japanese version of the questionnaire for quality of life measurement. Ann Cancer Res Ther 1994; 3: 45-53.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yamaoka K, Ogoshi K, Haruyama K, Kobayashi K, Takeda Y, Watanabe M, et al. Validity of the Japanese version of the questionnaire for quality of life measurement (QOL20). IMD, in press.

  7. Yamaoka K. Questionnaire construction of quality of life and quantification method III. In: Hayashi C (ed.) The Eighth Japan and Korea Joint Conference of Statistics, Okayama, Japan, 1994. pp. 77-82.

  8. Eysenck HJ, Eysenck SBG. Manual of Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (Junior and Adult). San Diego, CA: EdITS, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Eysenck HJ, Eysenck SBG. Manual of Eysenck Personality Inventory. San Diego, CA: EdITS, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Guttman L. The quantification of a class of attributes. A theory and method of scale construction. In: Horst P, ed. The Prediction of Personal Adjustment. New York: Social Science Research Council, 1941. pp. 319-348.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hayashi C. Theory and example of quantification (II). Proc Inst Stat Math 1956; 4: 19-30.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hayashi C. Quantification method III or correspondence analysis in medical science. Ann Cancer Res Ther 1992; 1: 17-21.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Eysenck HJ, Eysenck SBG. Manual of the Eysenck Personality Scales (EPS Adult). Sevenoaks, Kent: Hodder & Stoughton, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Eysenck HJ, Eysenck SBG. Manual of Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Revised. San Diego, CA: EdITS, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lynn R, Martin T. National differences for thirty-seven nations in extroversion, neuroticism, psychoticism and economic, demographic and other correlates. Person Individ Diff 1995; 19: 403-406.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Barrett P, Eysenck SBG. The assessment of personality factors across 25 countries. Person Individ Diff 1984; 5: 615-632.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shigehisa T. Personality and cancer: a cross-cultural perspective. Ann Cancer Res Ther 1995; 4: 5-19.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shigehisa T, Ikeda S, Koike S. Rationality-antiemotionality, harmony-seeking and related variables: an analysis of premorbid personality. Tokyo Kasei Gakuin Univ J 1995; 35: 421-436.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shigehisa T, Fukui, I. Cancer-prone type C personality toxic component: suppression of emotion. Jap Health Psychol 1995; 3: 25-39.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shigehisa T, Oda M. Premorbid personality, anger and behavioral health: the multifactorial approach to health and disease. Jap Health Psychol 1993; 2: 43-53.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bowling A. Measuring Health: a Review of Quality of Life Measurement Scales. Backingham: Open University Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Calman KC. Definitions and dimensions of quality of life. In: Aaronson NK, Beckman J (eds) The Quality of Life of Cancer Patients. New York: Raven Press, 1987. pp. 1-9.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cox DR, Fletcher AE, Gore SM, Spiegelhalter DJ, James DR. Quality-of-life assessment: can we keep it simple? J R Stat Soc A 1992; 155(Part 3): 353-393.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kentros MK, Terkelsen K, Hull J, Smith TE, Goodman M. The relationship between personality and quality of life in persons with schizoaffective disorder and schizophrenia. Qual Life Res 1997; 6: 118-122.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Costa PT Jr, McCrae RR. Influence of extroversion and neuroticism on subjective well-being. J Person Soc Psychol 1980; 38: 668-678.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Costa PT Jr, McCrae RR, Zonderman AB. Environment and dispositional influences on well-being: longitudinal follow-up of an American national sample. Br J Psychol 1987; 78: 299-306.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Headey B, Wearing A. Personality, life events and subjective well-being: toward a dynamic equilibrium model. J Person Soc Psychol 1989; 47: 731-739.

    Google Scholar 

  28. O'Leary A, Shoor S, Lorig K, Holman HR. A cognitive — behavioral treatment for rheumatoid arthritis. Health Psychol 1988; 7: 527-542.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Schroder KEE, Schwarzer R, Endler NS. Predicting cardiac patients' quality of life from the characteristics of their spouses. J Health Psychol 1997; 2: 231-244.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Schwarzer R. Optimism, vulnerability and self-beliefs as health-related cognition: a systematic overview. Psychol Health 1994; 9: 161-180.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Friedman LC, Nelson DV, Baer PE, Lane M, Smith FE, Dworkin RJ. The relationship of dispositional optimism, daily life stress and domestic environment to coping methods used by cancer patients. J Behav Med 1992; 15: 127-141.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Bandura A. Self-efficacy mechanism in psychobiologic functioning. In: Schwarzer R, ed. Self-efficacy: Thought Control of Action. Washington, DC: Hemisphere, 1992: 355-394.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Hygiene and Public Health, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Japan

    K. Yamaoka*, T. Shigehisa & M. Watanabe

  2. Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Tokai University, Japan

    K. Ogoshi

  3. Oriental Medicine Research Center of the Kitasato Institute, Japan

    K. Haruyama

  4. Faculty of Humanities, Toyo Eiwa Women's University, Japan

    F. Hayashi

  5. Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Japan

    C. Hayashi

Authors
  1. K. Yamaoka*
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. T. Shigehisa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. K. Ogoshi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. K. Haruyama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. M. Watanabe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. F. Hayashi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. C. Hayashi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yamaoka*, K., Shigehisa, T., Ogoshi, K. et al. Health-related quality of life varies with personality types: a comparison among cancer patients, non-cancer patients and healthy individuals in a Japanese population. Qual Life Res 7, 535–544 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008830509237

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008830509237

Search

Navigation