References
Andersson, M. and Iwasa, Y. (1996) Sexual selection. Trends. Ecol. Evol. 11, 53–58.
Andersson, M.B. (1994) Sexual Selection. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 599 pp.
Berglund, A. Rosenqvist, G. Svensson, I. (1989) Reproductive success of females limited by males in two pipefish species. Am. Nat. 133, 506–516.
Clutton-Brock, T.H. and Parker, G.A. (1992) Potential reproductive rates and the operation of sexual selection. Q. Rev. Biol. 67, 437–456.
Clutton-Brock, T.H. and Vincent, A.C.J. (1991) Sexual selection and the potential reproductive rate of males and females. Nature 351, 58–60.
Emlen, S.T. and Oring, L.W. (1977) Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197, 215–223.
Owens, I.P.F. and Thompson, D.B.A. (1994) Sex differences, sex ratios and sex roles. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 258, 93–99.
Parker, G.A. and Simmons, L.W. (1996) Parental investment and the control of sexual selection: predicting the direction of sexual competition. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263, 315–321.
Reynolds, J.D. (1996) Animal breeding systems. Trends. Ecol. Evol. 11, 68–72.
Smith, C. and Wootton, R.J. (1995) The effect of brood cannibalism on the operational sex ratio in parental teleost fishes. Rev. Fish. Biol. Fish. 5, 372–376.
Vincent, A. Ahnesjö, I. Berglund, A. and Rosenqvist, G. (1992) Pipefishes and seahorses: are they all sex role reversed? Trends Ecol. Evol. 7, 237–241.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kvarnemo, C. Points of view: Why male cannibalism won't cause a female-biased OSR -- a comment on Smith and Wootton's paper. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 8, 93–98 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008816601559
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008816601559