Similarity versus docking in 3D virtual screening

Abstract

The development of similarity methods for fast flexible ligand superposition has recently received considerable attention. These efforts have brought similarity methods to a level of performance comparable to the well established protein-ligand docking methods for binding mode assessment and molecular database screening. However, the strengths and intrinsic limitations of both methodologies have been also stressed out extensively. As the number of resolved ligand-bound protein structures increases, combining ligand-based and receptor-based approaches emerges as a consensus strategy to maximally exploit the structural information available and improve the results obtained with either of the methods alone.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. 1.

    Walters, P.A., Stahl, M.T. and Murcko, M.A., Drug Discov. Today, 3 (1998) 160.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Armstrong, R.W., Combs, A.P., Tempest, P.A., Brown, S.D. and Keating, T.A., Acc. Chem. Res., 29 (1996) 123.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Koltermann, A., Kettling, U., Bieschke, J., Winkler, T. and Eigen, M., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 95 (1998) 1421.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    VanDrie, J.H. and Lajiness, M.S., Drug Discov. Today, 3 (1998) 274.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Kubinyi, H., Curr. Opin. Drug Discov. Develop., 1 (1998) 16.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Ghose, A.K., Viswanadhan, V.N. and Wendoloski, J.J., In Parrill, A. and Reddy, M.R. (Eds.) Rational Drug Design, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Clark, D.E., Drug Discov. Today, 5 (2000) 49.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Martin, J.L., Curr. Med. Chem., 3 (1996) 419.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Kuntz, I.D., Science, 257 (1992) 1078.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Böhm, H.-J., Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 7 (1996) 433.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Kuntz, I.D., Blaney, J.M., Oatley, S.J., Langridge, R.L. and Ferrin, T.E., J. Mol. Biol., 161 (1982) 269.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Rarey, M., Kramer, B., Lengauer, T. and Klebe, G., J. Mol. Biol., 261 (1996) 470.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Welch, W., Ruppert, J. and Jain, A.N., Chem. Biol., 3 (1996) 449.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Jones, G., Willett, P., Glen, R.C., Leach, A.R. and Taylor, R., J. Mol. Biol., 267 (1997) 727.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Morris, G.M., Goodsell, D.S., Halliday, R.S., Huey, R., Hart, W.E., Belew, R.K. and Olson, A.J., J. Comput. Chem., 19 (1998) 1639.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Sun, Y., Ewing, T.J., Skillman, A.G. and Kuntz, I.D., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 12 (1998) 597.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Baxter, C.A., Murray, C.W., Clark, D.E., Westhead, D.R. and Eldridge, M.D. Proteins, 33 (1998) 367.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Wang, J., Kollman, P.A. and Kuntz, I.D., Proteins, 36 (1999) 1.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Trosset, J.Y. and Scheraga, H.A., J. Comput. Chem., 20 (1999) 412.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Fradera, X., Knegtel, R.M.A. and Mestres, J., Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet., 40 (2000) 623.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Ewing, T. and Kuntz, I.D., J. Comput. Chem., 18 (1997) 1175.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Vieth, M., Hirst, J.D., Dominy, B.N., Daigler, H. and Brooks III, C.L., J. Comput. Chem., 19 (1998) 1623.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Bush, B.L. and McCammon, J.A., Biophys. J., 72 (1997) 1047.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Ajay and Murcko, M.A., J. Med. Chem., 38 (1996) 4953.

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Raffa, R.B., Life Sci., 65 (1999) 967.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Friesner, R.A. and Beachy, M.D., Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 8 (1998) 257.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Monard, G. and Merz Jr., K.M., Acc. Chem. Res., 32 (1999) 904.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Vieth, M., Hirst, J.D., Kolinski, A. and Brooks III, C.L., J. Comput. Chem., 19 (1998) 1612.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Tame, J.R.H., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 13 (1999) 99.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Knegtel, R.M.A., Bayada, D.M., Engh, R.A., von der Saal, W., van Geerestein, V.J. and Grootenhuis, P.D.J. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 13 (1999) 167.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Muegge, I. and Martin, Y.C., J. Med. Chem., 42 (1999) 791.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Gschwend, D.A. and Kuntz, I.D., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 10 (1996) 123.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Leach, A.R., J. Mol. Biol., 235 (1994) 345.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Knegtel, R.M.A., Kuntz, I.D. and Oshiro, C.M., J. Mol. Biol., 266 (1997) 424.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Apostolakis, J., Plückthun, A. and Caflisch, A., J. Comput. Chem., 19 (1998) 21.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Sandak, B., Wolfson, H.J. and Nussinov, R., Proteins, 32 (1998) 159.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Blaney, J.M. and Dixon, J.S., Perspect. Drug Discov. and Design, 1 (1993) 301.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Jones, G. and Willett, P., Curr. Opin. Biotech., 6 (1995) 652.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Lengauer, T. and Rarey, M., Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 6 (1996) 402.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Sansom, C., Nat. Biotechnol, 16 (1998) 917.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Kirkpatrick, D.L., Watson, S. and Ulhaq, S., Comb. Chem. High-Through. Screen., 2 (1999) 211.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Knegtel, R.M.A. and Wagener, M., Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet., 37 (1999) 334.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Johnson, M.A. and Maggiora, G.M. (Eds.), Concepts and Applications of Molecular Similarity, Wiley, New York, NY, 1990.

  44. 44.

    Dean, P.M. (Ed.), Molecular Similarity in Drug Design, Blackie Academic, London, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Karelson, M., Lobanov, V.S. and Katritzky, A.R., Chem. Rev., 96 (1996) 1027.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Hansch, C., Hoekman, D. and Gao, H., Chem. Rev., 96 (1996) 1045.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Cramer III, R.D., Patterson, D.E. and Bunce, J.D., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 110 (1988) 5959.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Klebe, G., Perspect. Drug Discov. Design, 12/13/14 (1998) 87.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Kubinyi, H. (Ed.), 3D QSAR in Drug Design: Theory, Methods and Applications, ESCOM, Leiden, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Kubinyi, H., Folkers, G. and Martin, Y.C. (Eds.), 3D QSAR in Drug Design: Ligandprotein Interactions and Molecular Similarity, Perspect. Drug Discov. Design, 9/10/11n (1998).

  51. 51.

    Kubinyi, H., Folkers, G. and Martin, Y.C. (Eds.), 3D QSAR in Drug Design: Recent Advances, Perspect. Drug Discov. Design, 12/13/14n (1998).

  52. 52.

    Willett, P., Similarity and Clustering in Chemical Information Systems, Wiley, New York, NY, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Martin, E.J., Blaney, J.M., Siani, M.A., Spellmeyer, D.C., Wong, A.K. and Moos, W.K., J. Med. Chem., 38 (1995) 1431.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Hassan, M., Bielawaski, J.P., Hempel, J.C. and Waldman, M., Mol. Div., 2 (1996) 64.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Bayada, D.M., Hamersma, H. and van Geerestein, V.J., J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 39 (1999) 1.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Martin, E.J. and Critchlow, R.E., J. Comb. Chem., 1 (1999) 32.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Agrafiotis, D.K., Myslik, J.C. and Salemme, F.R., Mol. Div., 4 (1999) 1.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Barnard, J.M. and Downs, G.M., J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 32 (1992) 644.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Brown, R.D. and Martin, Y.C., J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 37 (1997) 1.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Matter, H., J. Med. Chem., 40 (1997) 1219.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Flower, D.R., J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 38 (1998) 379.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Xue, J., Godden, J.W. and Bajorath, J., J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 39 (1999) 881.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Cramer, R.D., Redl, G. and Berkhoff, C.E., J. Med. Chem., 17 (1973) 533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Hagadone, T.R., J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 32 (1992) 515.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Van Drie, J.H., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 11 (1997) 39.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Pickett, S.D., Luttmann, C., Guerin, V., Laoui, A. and James, E., J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 38 (1998) 144.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Chen, X., Rusinko III, A., Tropsha, A. and Young, S.S., J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 39 (1999) 887.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Kearsley, S.K. and Smith, G.M., Tetrahedron Comput. Methods, 3 (1990) 615.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Good, A.C., Hodgkin, E.E. and Richards, G.W., J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 32 (1992) 188.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Jain, A.N., Dietterich, T.G., Lathrop, R.H., Chapman, D., Critchlow Jr., R.E., Bauer, B.E., Webster, T.S. and Lozano-Perez, T., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 8 (1994) 635.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Klebe, G., Mietzner, T. and Weber, F., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 8 (1994) 751.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    McMartin, C. and Bohacek, R.S., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 9 (1995) 237.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Perkins, T.D.J., Mills, J.E.J. and Dean, P.M., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 9 (1995) 479.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Jones, G., Willett, P. and Glen, R.C., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 9 (1995) 532.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Lemmen, C., Hiller, C. and Lengauer, T., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 12 (1998) 491.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Mestres, J., Rohrer, D.C. and Maggiora, G.M., J. Comput. Chem., 18 (1997) 934.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Lemmen, C., Lengauer, T. and Klebe, G., J. Med. Chem., 41 (1998) 4502.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Miller, M.D., Sheridan, R.P. and Kearsley, S.K., J. Med. Chem., 42 (1999) 1505.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Klebe, G., In Kubinyi, H. (Ed.) 3D QSAR in Drug Design: Theory, Methods and Applications, ESCOM, Leiden, 1993, p. 173.

    Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Mattos, C. and Ringe, D., In Kubinyi, H. (Ed.) 3D QSAR in Drug Design: Theory, Methods and Applications, ESCOM, Leiden, 1993, p. 226.

    Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Böhm, H.-J. and Klebe, G., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 35 (1996) 2588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Grootenhuis, P.D.J. and van Helden, S.P., In Wipff, G. (Ed.) Computational Approaches in Supramolecular Chemistry, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1994, p. 137.

    Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Babine, R.E. and Bender, S.L., Chem. Rev., 97 (1997) 1359.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Tripos Inc., St. Louis, MO, U.S.A.

  85. 85.

    Meng, E.C., Shoichet, B.K. and Kuntz, I.D., J. Comput. Chem., 13 (1992) 505.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Rohrer, D.C., In Carbó R. (Ed.) Molecular Similarity and Reactivity: From Quantum Chemical to Phenomenological Approaches, Kluwer, Amsterdam, 1995, p. 141.

    Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Mestres J., Rohrer, D.C. and Maggiora, G.M., J. Mol. Graph. Model, 15 (1997) 114.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Mestres, J., Rohrer, D.C. and Maggiora, G.M., J. Comput.-AidedMol. Design, 13 (1999) 79.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Mestres, J., Rohrer, D.C. and Maggiora, G.M., J. Comput.-AidedMol. Design, 14 (2000) 39.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Gasteiger, J. and Marsili, M., Tetrahedron 36 (1980) 3219.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Sadowski, J., Gasteiger, J. and Klebe, G., Inf. Comput. Sci., 34 (1994) 1000.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jordi Mestres.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mestres, J., Knegtel, R.M. Similarity versus docking in 3D virtual screening. Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design 20, 191–207 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008789224614

Download citation

  • flexible ligand docking
  • flexible ligand superposition
  • molecular similarity
  • thrombin
  • virtual screening