Skip to main content
Log in

Sailing Towards the Brave New World of Zero Transaction Costs

  • Published:
European Journal of Law and Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Coase Theorem is in essence an if-A-then-B statement. Previous discussions of the Theorem have mostly focused on the then-B part and examined that, given the condition of A, whether B is true or not. The present study attempts to analyze the Theorem from a different angle. In particular, we push the if-A assumption, i.e., the zero transaction costs assumption, to its logical limit, and then explore the implications. We argue that the price mechanism, which is implicitly employed as the foundational basis of the Coase Theorem, is the result of positive transaction costs. Consequently, if transaction costs are zero, then money and prices as commonly understood would not exist, and the value of production would become a vague concept without any operational content. As such, the world of zero transaction costs may be even more peculiar than Coase might have thought!

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adams, W. and Brock, J. W. (1993). Adam Smith Goes to Moscow: A Dialogue on Radical Reform, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Allen, D. W. (1991a). “Book Review: The Firm, the Market, and the Law.” Canadian Journal of Economics. 24, 740–743.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Allen, D. W. (1991b). “What Are Transaction Costs?” Research in Law and Economics. 14, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barzel, Y. (1982). “Measurement Cost and the Organization of Markets.” Journal of Law and Economics. 25, 27–48.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Buchanan, J. M. (1986). “Rights, Efficiency, and Exchange: The Irrelevance of Transactions Cost.” In J. M. Buchanan, (ed.), Liberty, Market and the State: Political Economy in the 1980s, New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Coase, R. H. (1937). “The Nature of the Firm.” Economica. 4, 386–405.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Coase, R. H. (1959). “The Federal Communications Commission.” Journal of Law and Economics. 2, 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Coase, R. H. (1960). “The Problem of Social Cost.” Journal of Law and Economics. 3, 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Coase, R. H. (1988). The Firm, the Market, and the Law, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Coase, R. H. (1992). “The Institutional Structure of Production.” American Economic Review. 82, 713–719.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cooter, R. (1982). “The Cost of Coase.” Journal of Legal Studies. 11, 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dahlman, C. J. (1979). “The Problem of Externality.” Journal of Law and Economics. 22, 141–162.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Economist, The. (1997). Feb. 15, Mar. 15, Jun. 7, Jul. 19, Oct. 11, Nov. 22.

  14. Elster, J. (1984). Uysses and the Sirens: Studies in Rationality and Irrationality, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Epstein, R. A. (1993). “Holdouts, Externalities, and the Single Owner: One More Salute to Ronald Coase.” Journal of Law and Economics. 36, 553–594.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Frank, R. (1988). Passions Within Reason, New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hovenkamp, H. (1992). “Rationality in Law & Economics.” George Washington Law Review. 60, 293–338.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Landes, W. M. and Posner, R. A. (1993). “The Influence of Economics on Law.” Journal of Law and Economics. 36, 153–173.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Libecap, G. D. (1989). Contracting for Property Rights, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Medema, S. G., (ed.). (1995). The Legacy of Ronald in Economic Analysis, Vermont: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  21. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  22. O'Driscoll, G. P. and Rizzo, M. J. (1996). The Economics of Time and Egnorance, 2nd edition, London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Posner, R. A. (1986). Economic Analysis of Law, 3rd edition, Boston: Little, Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Posner, R. A. (1993a). “The New Institutional Economics Meets Law and Economics.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics. 149, 73–87.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Posner, R. A. (1993b). “Nobel Laureate Ronald Coase and Methodology.” Journal of Economic Perspectives. 7, 195–210.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Shapiro, F. R. (1996). “The Most-Cited Law Review Articles Revisited.” Chicago-Kent Law Review. 71, 751–779.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Stigler, G. (1988). Memoirs of an Unregulated Economist, New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Stigler, G. (1989). “Two Notes on the Coase Theorem.” Yale Law Journal. 99, 631–633.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Stiglitz, J. E. (1994). Whither Socialism, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Umbeck, J. (1981). “Might Makes Rights: A Distribution of Property Rights.” Economic Inquiry. 19, 38–59.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Williamson, O. E. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Williamson, O. E. (1989). “Book Review: The Firm, the Market, and the Law.” California Law Review. 77, 223–231.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Williamson, O. E. (1993). “The Evolving Science of Organization.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics. 149, 36–63.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Williamson, O. E. (1994). “Evaluating Coase.” Journal of Economic Perspective. 8, 201–209.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Williamson, O. E. (1997). “Hierarchies, Markets and Power in the Economy: An Economic Perspective.” In Claude Menard, (ed.), Transaction Cost Economics: Recent Developments. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Zerbe, R. O. (1980). “The Problem of Social Cost in Resprospect.” Research in Law and Economics. 2, 83–102.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hsiung, B. Sailing Towards the Brave New World of Zero Transaction Costs. European Journal of Law and Economics 8, 153–169 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008768523952

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008768523952

Navigation