Abstract
Six strains of crown gall bacteria were isolated from flowering cherry. It was revealed by Otten paper electrophoresis that of the six strains, only BYH18-4 possessed the octopine type Ti plasmid, the remainder having nopaline type Ti plasmid. BYH5-1 was identified by physiological and biochemical tests to be Agrobacterium tumefaciens (originally biovar 1). The other five were A. rhizogenes (originally biovar 2). It was demonstrated with Stonier's method of double layer medium that flowering cherry crown gall bacteria exhibited different sensitivities to agrocin produced by biocontrol strain K1026. Strain K1026 on greenhouse-grown sunflower seedlings exerted a relatively potent inhibitory action on flowering cherry crown gall bacteria. Artificial inoculation showed that K1026 produced 67–99% inhibition of flowering cherry crown gall disease, compared with the treatment of inoculation with crown gall bacteria only.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kerr A and Htay K (1974) Biological control of crown gall through bacteriocin production. Physiol Plant Pathol 4: 37–44
Li JQ, Wang HM, Wang ZF and Wang JH (1996) Etiology and biocontrol of Ni-plum crown gall disease. In: Qiu SB (ed) Advances in Plant Protection of China (pp 276–278) China Science and Technology Press, Beijing
Lippincott JA, Lippincott BB and Starr MP (1982) The genus Agrobacterium. In: Starr MP (ed) Phytopathogenic Bacteria (pp 843–855) Springer-Verlag, New York, Berlin, Heidelberg, Tokyo
Ma DQ, Lin YR, Zhou J, Xiang WN, You JF, Xie XM and Chen PM (1985) Biotype and plasmid type of Agrobacterium tumefaciens isolated from the crown gall of grapevine in North China. Acta Microbiol Sinica 25(1): 45–53
Otten LABM and Schilperoort RA (1978) A rapid microscale method for the detection of lysopine and nopaline dehydrogenase activities. Biochim Biophys Res Commun 527: 497–500
Ren XZ, Pan XM, Fang ZD, Jin Q and An WC (1986) Identification of biotype Agrobacterium tumefaciens of hop and preliminary studies on biological control. Acta Phytophyl Sinica 13(1): 45–52
Stonier T (1960) Agrobacterium tumefaciens Conn. II. Production of an antibiotic substance. J Bacteriol 79: 889–898
Wang HM, Li JQ, Sui XH and Wang JH (1998a) Etiology and biocontrol strains of rose crown gall. J. China Agricul Univ 3(suppl): 83–97
Wang HM, Li JQ, Wang JH and Zhao HE (1996) Species and the plasmids of peach crown gall pathogen. In: Qiu SB (ed) Advances in Plant Protection of China (pp 272–275) China Science and Technology Press, Beijing
Wang HM, Liang YJ, Yun T and Di YB (1991) Biological control of crown gall with introduced K84 in China. I. Investigation and identification of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Acta Agricul Univ Pekin 17(1): 91–94
Wang HM, Sui XH, Li JQ, Dai XY and Ma DQ (1998b) Isolation and identification of Agrobacterium spp. from cherry crown galls and the sensitivities to agrocin 84. Acta Microbiol Sinica 38(5): 381–385
Zhang JJ, Zhou J and Xiang WN (1988) Studies on the types of Agrobacterium tumefaciens from poplars in China and their sensitivity to agrocins. Acta Microbiol Sinica 28(1): 12–18
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, H., Wang, H., Wang, J. et al. The Pathogen of Crown Gall Disease on Flowering Cherry and its Sensitivity to Strain K1026. European Journal of Plant Pathology 106, 475–479 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008734120555
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008734120555