Skip to main content
Log in

Control of Loose Smut (Ustilago nuda and U. tritici) Infections in Barley and Wheat by Foliar Applications of Systemic Fungicides

  • Published:
European Journal of Plant Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Foliar application of a number of broad-spectrum systemic fungicides (particularly conazole fungicides) to loose smut-infected plants of wheat and barley in a 3-spray programme resulted in a marked reduction in the percentage of plants producing infected ears. Such foliar fungicides may have a previously unseen role in reducing the levels of loose smut infection in wheat and barley.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anonymous (1980) The Cereal Seed Regulations, 1980. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London

  • Anonymous (1986) Use of fungicides and insecticides on cereals, Booklet 2257. MAFF Publications, Alnwich, UK

  • Batts CCV and Jeater A (1958) The development of loose smut (Ustilago tritici) in susceptible varieties of wheat, and some observations on field infections. Transactions of the British Mycological Society 41: 115-125

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean WJ (1964) Some effects of temperature and humidity on loose smut of wheat. PhD thesis. University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhitaphichit P and Jones P (1991) Virulent and fungicide-tolerant races of loose smut (Ustilago nuda and U. tritici) in Ireland. Plant Pathology 40: 508-514

    Google Scholar 

  • Doling DA (1966) Loose smut in wheat and barley. Agriculture, London 73: 523-527

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgington LV, Walton GS and Miller PM (1966) Fungicides selective for Basidiomycetes. Science 153: 307-308

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones P (1997) Control of loose smut (Ustilago nuda andU. tritici) infections in barley and wheat plants by foliar application of triadimefon. Plant Pathology 46: 946-951

    Google Scholar 

  • Malik MMS and Batts CCV (1960) The development of loose smut (Ustilgo nuda) in barley plants, with observations on spore formation in nature and in culture. Transactions of the British Mycological Society 43: 126-131

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin RA and Edgington IV (1980) Effect of temperature on efficiency of triadimenol and fenapanil to control loose smut in barley. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 2: 201-204

    Google Scholar 

  • Rennie WJ and Seaton RD (1975) Loose smut of barley. The embryo test as a means of assessing loose smut infection in seed stocks. Seed Science and Technology 3: 697-709

    Google Scholar 

  • Shinohara M (1976) Behaviour of Ustilago nuda (Jens.) Rostrup and U. tritici (Pers.) Rostrup in their host tissues. Review of Plant Protection Research 9: 124-142

    Google Scholar 

  • von Schmeling B and Kulka M (1966) Systemic fungicidal activity of 1,4-oxathiin derivatives. Science 152: 659-660

    Google Scholar 

  • Worthing CR and Hance RJ (1991) The Pesticide Manual. A World Compendium, Ninth Edition. British Crop Protection Council, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Wray MW and Pickett AA (1985) Trends in loose smut (Ustilago nuda) infections in certified seed of barely in England and Wales 1976 to 1983. Journal of the National Institute of Agricultural Botany 17: 31-40

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadoks JC, Chang TT and Konzak CF (1974) A decimal code for the growth stage of cereals. Weed Research 14: 415-421

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jones, P. Control of Loose Smut (Ustilago nuda and U. tritici) Infections in Barley and Wheat by Foliar Applications of Systemic Fungicides. European Journal of Plant Pathology 105, 729–732 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008733628282

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008733628282

Navigation