Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal Redistribution with Unobservable Preferences for an Observable Merit Good

  • Published:
International Tax and Public Finance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper considers a government thatseeks both to redistribute income and to encourage or discouragethe consumption of a certain good. This good is assumed to beeither a merit or demerit good. Individuals differ in their exogenousincome and in their preferences for the merit good. The onlyvariable the government can perfectly observe is each individual'sconsumption of the merit good. In order to account for meritgood considerations, we consider a modification of the utilitariansocial welfare function in which the government imposes uniformpreferences, despite the heterogeneous individual preferences,at a level which will depend on the merit or demerit nature ofthe observable good. We derive the optimal nonlinear redistributivepolicy and compare our results to the ones that would be obtainedunder a utilitarian social welfare function that respects theown preferences of individuals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atkinson, A. B. and J. E. Stiglitz. (1976). “The Design of Tax Structure: DirectVersus Indirect Taxation.” Journal of Public Economics 6, 55-75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A. B. and J. E. Stiglitz. (1980). Lectures on Public Economics. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besley, T. (1988). “A Simple Model for Merit Good Arguments.” Journal of Public Economics 35, 371-383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackorby, C. and D. Donaldson. (1988). “Cash Versus Kind, Self-selection and Efficient Transfers.” American Economic Review 78, 691-700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, G. and C. Walsh. (1990). “Rationality, Individualism and Public Policy” (Centre for Research on Federal Financial Relations, The Australian National University, Canberra).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cremer, H., M. Marchand, and P. Pestieau. (1996). “Interregional Redistribution through Tax Surcharge.” International Tax and Public Finance 3, 157-173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities. (1996). “Economic Evaluation of the Internal Market.” European Economy: Reports and Studies 4.

  • Fleurbaey, M. and F. Maniquet. (1998). “Optimal Income Taxation: An Ordinal Approach,” CORE DP 9865.

  • Musgrave, R. (1959). The Theory of Public Finance. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirrlees, J. A. (1971). “An Exploration in the Theory of Optimal Income Taxation.” Review of Economic Studies 38, 175-208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirrlees, J. A. (1976). “Optimal Tax Theory: A Synthesis.” Journal of Public Economics 6, 327-358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, A. L. and R. J. Zeckhauser. (1982). “Targeting Transfers through Restrictions on Recipients.” American Economic Review (Papers and Proceedings) 72, 372-377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. (1982). “Self-selection and Pareto Efficient Taxation.” Journal of Public Economics 17, 213-240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. (1987). “Pareto Efficient and Optimal Taxation and the New NewWelfare Economics.” Chapter 15 in: A. J. Auerbach and M. Feldstein (eds.), Handbook of Public Economics. Vol. II, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V, North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Racionero, M.d.M. Optimal Redistribution with Unobservable Preferences for an Observable Merit Good. International Tax and Public Finance 7, 479–501 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008733405651

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008733405651

Navigation