Skip to main content
Log in

The Double Paradox of Juvenile Justice

  • Published:
European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article considers the history of a century of juvenile justice. Illinois 'invented' the separate 'children's court' in 1899 and this concept was spearheaded in Northern America, Great Britain and continental Europe in the first decades of the new century. However, a century after its foundation the future of the juvenile court is in doubt everywhere in the Western world. Some conclude that there is a cyclical pattern in juvenile justice policies. That proposition is rejected in this article. The proposition of a cyclical pattern also presupposes that there is no real problem at stake in treating juvenile offenders. The main point of this article, however, is that juvenile justice cannot escape trying to solve a very complicated foundational issue. This issue is a double paradox, that is, juvenile justice has to solve two philosophical questions: the justification of punishment and the justification of punishment for non-adults. This diagnosis presents a new conceptual framework for an analysis of the history of juvenile justice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acton, H.B. (Ed.), The Philosophy of Punishment. London: Macmillan, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazemore, G., Restorative justice and earned redemption: Communities, victims, and offender reintegration. American Behavioral Scientist, 41(6), pp. 768–813, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, T.J., The Cycle of Juvenile Justice. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, J. and S. Mugford, Conditions of successful reintegration ceremonies: Dealing with juvenile offenders. British Journal of Criminology, 34(2), pp. 139–171, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavadino, M. and J. Dignan, The Penal System. London: Sage, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornell, H., Geschichte des Jugendstrafvollzugs: Ein Plädoyer für seine Abschaffung. Weinheim/Basel: Beltz Verlag, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doek, J., The juvenile court: An endangered species? European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 2(2), pp. 42–56, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duff, R.A. and D. Garland, A Reader on Punishment. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dünkel, F. and K. Meyer (Eds), Jugendstrafe und Jugendstrafvollzug: Stationäre Massnamen der Jugendkriminalrechtspflege im internationalen Vergleich. Freiburg: Max Planck Institut, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G., The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feld, B., Criminalizing the American juvenile court. In: R. Rodney (Ed.), Criminal Justice Research, vol. 18, Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferdinand, T.N., Juvenile delinquency or juvenile justice: Which came first. Criminology, 27(1), pp. 79–106, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkenauer, J.O., The Panacea Solution. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelsthorpe, L. and A. Morris, Juvenile justice 1945–1992. In: R. Morgan, R. Reiner and M. Maguire (Eds), Oxford Handbook of Criminology, pp. 949–993. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J., A Cycle of Outrage. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gittens, J., Poor Relations: The Children of the State of Illinois 1818–1990. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golden, R., Disposable Children: America's Child Welfare System. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groenhuijsen, M.S. and D. van der Landen (Eds), De moderne richting in het strafrecht: Theorie, praktijk, latere ontwikkelingen en actuele betekenis. Arnhem: Gouda Quint, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, H.L.A., Prolegomenon to the principles of punishment. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, vol. 60, 1959. Republished in Punishment and Responsibility: Essays in the Philosophy of Law, pp. 1–27. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1968.

  • Hirschi, T. and M. Gottfredson, Rethinking the juvenile justice system. In: T. Booth (Ed.), Juvenile Justice in the New Europe, pp. 46–65. Sheffield: Social Services Monographs, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honderich, T., Punishment: The Supposed Justifications. London: Hutchinson, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, J., National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges, 1994.

  • Howell, J., Juvenile Justice and Youth Violence. London: Sage, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, M.W. (Ed.), Western Systems of Juvenile Justice. London: Sage, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinig, J., Punishment and Desert. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krisberg, B. and J.F. Austin, Reinventing Juvenile Justice. London: Sage, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindemeyer, K., A Right to Childhood: The US Children's Bureau and Child Welfare, 1912–46. Urbana/Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, T.H., Citizenship and Social Class. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehlbye, J. and L. Walgrave (Eds), Confronting Youth in Europe: Juvenile Crime and Juvenile Justice. Copenhagen: AKF Forlaget, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mennel, R.M., Thorns and Thistles: Juvenile Delinquents in the United States 1825–1940. Hanover: University Press of New England, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberwittler, D., From punishment to education? Changing penal responses to juvenile delinquency in late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries: England and Germany compared. Comenius, 16(1), pp. 7–25, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platt, T., The Child Savers: The Invention of Delinquency. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Primoratz, I., Justifying Legal Punishment. New Jersey: Humanities Press International, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, J.L., The cycle of juvenile court history. Crime and Delinquency, 19, pp. 457–476, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shireman, C.H. and F.G. Reamer, Rehabilitating Juvenile Justice. New York: Columbia University Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoemaker, D.J. (Ed.), International Handbook on Juvenile Justice. London: Greenwood Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, J.R., Stubborn Children: Controlling Delinquency in the United States 1640–1981. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, J.R., Social knowledge and the generation of child welfare policy in the United States and Canada. In: D. Rueschemeyer and T. Skocpol (Eds), States, Social Knowledge, and the Origins of Modern Social Policies, pp. 201–230. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tutt, N., A decade of policy. British Journal of Criminology, 21, pp. 246–256, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walgrave, L., Beyond rehabilitation: In search of a constructive alternative in the judicial response to juvenile crime. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 2(2), pp. 57–75, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weijers, I., Het pedagogisch tekort van de strafrechtelijke kinderwet. Comenius, 18(1), pp. 12–27, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weijers, I., Improvement of the criminal child: The introduction of a juvenile justice system in the Netherlands. European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, 7(1), 1999a.

  • Weijers, I., De ‘verantwoordelijkheidspedagogiek’ van Mulock Houwer: Een hoofdstuk uit de geschiedenis van de gestichtsopvoeding. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Opvoeding, Vorming en Onderwijs, 1999b.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weijers, I. The Double Paradox of Juvenile Justice. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 7, 329–351 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008732820029

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008732820029

Navigation