Abstract
Complexity science has been used as a lens to interpret organizations (Goldstein 1994; Morgan 1993, 1997; Stacey 1992, 1996a; Wheatley 1992; Wheatley and Kellner-Rogers 1996; Zimmerman 1993a, 1993b). These interpretations have shone a light on aspects of organizations that were idiosyncratic or at least difficult to reconcile with dominant organizational theories. In this paper, we go beyond interpreting results through a complexity lens to demonstrating how board members and staff of an organization deliberately applied insights from complexity science to improve their work. Using an action learning approach, we worked with the board and staff for a year. One of the lessons from this journey was the need to differentiate between "fake" complexity and real complexity. Using "fake" complexity, simple issues were complexified and complex issues were avoided. Another key lesson was the role of relationships for complex issues. This paper presents a "STAR" relationship model to help organizations discern the generative potential of current and future relationships. Each point, or letter, of the STAR represents one dimension of a potentially generative relationship. Through the action research process, both the researchers and the members of the organization extended our understanding of how complexity science can enhance the capacity to evolve in a rapidly changing environment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Argyris, C., R. Putnam, and D. McLain Smith. (1985). Action Science. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Elden, M., and M. Levin. (1991). “Co-generative learning: Bringing participation into action research,” in W. F. Whyte (ed.), Participative Action Research. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Emery, F., and E. Trist. (1973). Towards a Social Ecology. London: Plenum.
Goldstein, J. (1994). The Unshackled Organization: Facing the Challenge of Unpredictability Through Spontaneous Reorganization. Portland, OR: Productivity Press.
Goodwin, B. (1994). How the Leopard Changed Its Spots: The Evolution of Complexity. New York, NY: Touchstone.
Holland, J. (1995). Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley.
Kauffman, S. (1995). At Home in the Universe. New York, NY and Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Kelly, K. (1994). Out of Control: The Rise of Neo-Biological Civilization. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Lane, D., and R. Maxfield. (1996). “Strategy under complexity: Fostering generative relationships,” Long Range Planning 29, 215–231.
Lewin, R. (1992). Complexity: Life at the Edge of Chaos. New York, NY: Collier Books.
McDonald, P., and J. Gandz. (1992). “Getting value form shared values,” Organizational Dynamics 20(3), winter.
Morgan, G. (1989). Class notes from a PhD qualitative research course.
Morgan, G. (1993). Imaginization: The Art of Creative Management. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Morgan, G. (1997). Images of Organization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Morley, D. (1989). “Frameworks for organizational change: Towards action learning in global environments,” in S. Wright and D. Morley (eds.), Learning Works: Searching for Organizational Futures. Toronto: ABL Group, FES, York University.
Stacey, R. (1996a). Complexity and Creativity in Organizations. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
Stacey, R. (1996b). Strategic Management and Organisational Dynamics. Pitman Publishing, London.
Stacey, R. (1992). Managing the Unknowable: Strategic Boundaries Between Order and Chaos in Organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Waldrop, M. (1992). Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
Wheatley, M. S. (1992). Leadership and the New Science. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
Wheatley, M.S., M. Kellner-Rogers. (1996). A Simpler Way. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1993a). “Chaos and nonequilibrium: The flip side of strategic processes,” Organization Development Journal 11(1), spring, 31–38.
Zimmerman, B.J. (1993b), “The inherent drive towards chaos,” in P. Lorange, B. Chakravarthy, J. Roos, and A. Van-de Ven (eds.), Strategic Processes: Change, Learning and Cooperation. London, England: Basil Blackwell Inc.
Zimmerman, B.J., C. Lindberg, and P. Psek. (1998). Edgeware: Complexity Resources for Health Care Leaders. Dallas: VHA, also available at www.edgeplace.com
Zimmerman, B.J, and C. Lindberg. (1999). “Stories of emergence in health care,” Schulich School of Business Working Paper #01/99, York University, Canada.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zimmerman, B., Hayday, B. A Board's Journey into Complexity Science: Lessons from (and for) Staff and Board Members. Group Decision and Negotiation 8, 281–303 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008709903070
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008709903070