Skip to main content
Log in

Fiscal Externalities and Efficient Transfers in a Federation

  • Published:
International Tax and Public Finance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates properties of the second best allocation in a fiscal federal system in which both federal tax and intergovernmental grants are involved and the taxation is distortionary. Also, optimal federal grants and tax policies in a decentralized fiscal system are examined. Our major findings are: (i) the second best does not require the equalization of marginal cost of public funds across regions in a conventional form; (ii) matching grants based on either the local tax rates or tax revenues should be introduced to internalize the tax externality; and (iii) once lump-sum and matching grants are optimized, federal tax policy becomes redundant so the optimal fiscal gap is indeterminate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atkinson, B. A., and J. F. Stiglitz. (1980). Lecture on Public Economics. McGraw-Hill.

  • Auerbach, A. J. (1985). “The Theory of Excess Burden and Optimal Taxation.” InA. J. Auerbach and M. Feldstein (eds.), Handbook of Public Economics I. North-Holland.

  • Boadway, R. W. (1982). “On the Method of Taxation and the Provision of Local Public Goods: Comment.” American Economic Review 72, 846-851.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boadway, R. W., and F. R. Flatters. (1982). “Efficiency and Equalization Payments in a Federal System of Government: A Synthesis and Extension of Recent Results.” Canadian Journal of Economics 15, 613-633.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boadway, R., and M. Keen. (1996). “Efficiency and the Optimal Direction of Federal-State Transfers.” International Tax and Public Finance 3, 137-155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boadway, R., M. Marchand, and M, Vigneault. (1997). “The Consequences of Overlapping Tax Bases for Redistribution and Public Spending in a Federation.” Journal of Public Economics, forthcoming.

  • Boadway, R. W., and D. E. Wildasin. (1990). “Optimal Tax-Subsidy Policies for Industrial Adjustment to Uncertain Shocks.” Oxford Economic Paper 42, 105-134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M., and C. J. Goetz. (1972). “Efficiency Limits of Fiscal Mobility: An Assessment of the Tiebout Model.” Journal of Public Economics 1, 25-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burbidge, J. B., and G. M. Myers. (1994a). “Redistribution Within and Across the Regions of a Federation.” Canadian Journal of Economics 27, 620-636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burbidge, J. B., and G. M. Myers. (1994b). “Population Mobility and Capital Tax Competition.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 24, 441-459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlby, B., and S. Wilson. (1994). “Fiscal Capacity, Tax Effort, and Optimal Equalization Grants.” Canadian Journal of Economics 27, 657-672.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlby, B. (1994). “The Distortionary Effect of Raising Taxes.” In W. B. P. Robson and W. M. Scarth (eds.), Deficit Reduction, What Pain, What Gain? C. D. Howe Institute.

  • Dahlby, B. (1996). “Fiscal Externalities and the Design of Intergovernmental Grants.” International Tax and Public Finance 3, 397-412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flatters, F. R., J. V. Henderson, and P. M. Mieszkowski. (1974). “Public Goods, Efficiency, and Regional Fiscal Equalization.” Journal of Public Economics 3, 99-112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, G., and P. Picard. (1996). “Incentives and Optimal Size of Local Jurisdictions.” European Economic Review 40, 19-41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, R. H. (1983). “An Optimal Taxation Approach to Fiscal Federalism.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 98, 567-586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, W. R. (1988). “Income Redistribution in a Federal System.” American Economic Review 78, 570-573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, H. (1995). “Public Goods, Distortionary Taxation and Perfect Household Mobility.” Mimeo, Queen's University.

  • Mansoorian, A., and G. M. Myers. (1993). “Attachment to Home and Efficiency Purchases of Population in a Fiscal Externality Economy.” Journal of Public Economics 52, 117-132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansoorian, A., and G. M. Myers. (1997). “On the Consequence of Government Objectives for Economies with Mobile Populations.” Journal of Public Economics 63, 265-281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, G. M. (1990). “Optimality, Free Mobility, and the Regional Authority in a Federation.” Journal of Public Economics 43, 107-121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, M. (1998). “Taxation and Deadweight Loss in a System of Intergovernmental Transfers.” Canadian Journal of Economics 31, 189-206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. F. (1982). “Self-Selection and Pareto Efficient Taxation.” Journal of Public Economics 17, 213-240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellisch, D. W. (1994). “Interregnal Spillover in the Presence of Perfect and Imperfect Household Mobility.” Journal of Public Economics 55, 167-184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellisch, D. W., and D. E. Wildasin. (1996). “Decentralized Income Redistribution and Immigration.” European Economic Review 40, 187-217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildasin, D. E. (1983). “The Welfare Effects of Intergovernmental Grants in an Economy with Independent Jurisdictions.” Journal of Urban Economics 13, 147-164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildasin, D. E. (1994). “Income Redistribution and Migration.” Canadian Journal of Economics 27, 637-656.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sato, M. Fiscal Externalities and Efficient Transfers in a Federation. International Tax and Public Finance 7, 119–139 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008709203069

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008709203069

Navigation