Abstract
A High Court case illustrates Swedish legal reasoning. The case extends the use of strict liability, although the main liability rule is negligence. The aim of the paper is to show the usefulness of the economic analysis in a practical case. The case concerns liability for damages caused by a leaky, hot-water pipe. The defendant maintained that it should not be held liable because it had not acted negligently, and the district court and the court of appeals supported the defence. Nevertheless, the High Court decided on strict liability. The High Court used a line of argumentation that, partly and implicitly, may have been economically correct. However, the precedence was most limited and unclear. Given an explicit goal of economic efficiency, the precedence would, in this simple and straightforward case, be that strict liability should prevail where the cause is unilateral and the injurer is able to cover and/or insure the loss.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bouckaert, Boudewijn och De Geest, Gerrit (1992). Bibliography of Law and Economics. Kluwer.
Hellner, Jan (1992). “Skadeståndsrätt,” Juristförlaget, 4:e upplagan.
Posner, Richard (1977). Economic Analysis of Law, Little, Brown and Company.
Rehme, Dag (1994). “En analys av ett rättsfall ur effektivitetssynpunkt,” Juridiska Institutionen, NJA 1991, s 720. Lunds Universitet. Memo.
Rehme, Dag and Skogh, G. (1994–95). “Strikt ansvar i rättsekonomisk analys,” Juridisk Tidskrift, no 5, pp. 1161–1170.
NJA (1991), Nytt Juridiskt Arkiv, p 720 [1991]. Norstedts.
SFS 1972:207 Skadeståndslagen.
SFS 1986:225. Miljöskadelagen.
Shavell, Steven (1987). Economic Analysis of Accident Law, Harvard University Press.
Skogh, Göran (1991), “Law and Economics in Sweden,” International Review of Law and Economics, No. 11 [319–324].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Skogh, G., Rehme, D. An Economic Analysis of a Swedish Environmental Liability Case. European Journal of Law and Economics 5, 167–177 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008692501987
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008692501987