Skip to main content
Log in

The anaesthetist as determinant factor of quality of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis. A survey in a university hospital.

  • Published:
Pharmacy World and Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In actual surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis, the anaesthetist administers the drugs at induction of anaesthesia. In the first phase of our quality‐of‐use intervention study on antimicrobial drugs in a large university hospital, information on the practice of antimicrobial prophylaxis was needed. The staff of 44 anaesthetists was interviewed by means of a questionnaire. Response rate was 36/44 (82%). The anaesthetists' method of administering surgical prophylaxis was rather uniform and inexpensive: cephalosporins were almost exclusively administered by bolus method. The main reason was that infusion was more cumbersome (range 77‐85%). Communication between surgeon and anaesthetist was reported to be poor, and in two out of three operating departments, orders of prophylaxis transmitted at or after induction accounted for more than 80%. Seventy‐seven percent of the responders asked the surgeon if prophylaxis was necessary if they were in doubt; 20% responded that they checked it systematically. The data collected by the inquiry proved useful in the process of optimizing surgical prophylaxis in our hospital.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hekster YA, Barrett CW. Formulary antibiotic surveillance program. J Pharm Clin 1987;6:335‐42.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Classen DC, Evans RS, Pestotnik SL, Horn SD, Menlove RL, Burke JP. The timing of prophylactic administration of antibiotics and the risk of surgical‐wound infection. N Engl J Med 1992;326:281‐6.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Abramowicz M. Antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Med Letter 1989;31(806):105‐8.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gyssens IC, Geerligs IEJ, Nannini‐Bergman MG, Knape JTA, Hekster YA, Van der Meer JWM. Optimising the timing of antimicrobial drug prophylaxis in surgery: an intervention study. J Antimicrob Chemother 1996;38:301‐8.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gyssens IC, Geerligs IEJ, Dony JMJ, Van der Vliet JA, Van Kampen A, Van den Broek PJ, Hekster YA, Van der Meer JWM. Optimising the quality of antimicrobial drug use in surgery: an intervention study. J Antimicrob Chemother 1996, in press.

  6. Gyssens IC, Lennards CA, Hekster YA, Van der Meer JWM. The cost of antimicrobial chemotherapy. A method for cost evaluation. Pharm Weekbl [Sci] 1991;13(6):248‐53.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mendelson J, Portnoy J, Dick V, Black M. Safety of the bolus administration of gentamicin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1976; 9:633‐8.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gilbert DN. Once‐daily aminoglycoside therapy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1991;35:399‐405.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gyssens, I., Knape, J., Van Hal, G. et al. The anaesthetist as determinant factor of quality of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis. A survey in a university hospital.. Pharm World Sci 19, 89–92 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008691007436

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008691007436

Navigation