Advertisement

International Tax and Public Finance

, Volume 4, Issue 2, pp 167–176 | Cite as

Environmental Taxes and Pre-Existing Distortions: The Normalization Trap

  • Ronnie Schöb
Article

Abstract

The double-dividend hypothesisclaims that green taxes will both improve the environment andreduce the distortions of existing taxes. According to the earlierliterature on the double dividend the tax rate for pollutinggoods should be higher than the Pigovian tax which fully internalizesthe marginal social damage from pollution, in order to obtaina ’second dividend‘. On the contrary, Bovenberg and de Mooij(1994) argue that environmental taxes typically exacerbate, ratherthan alleviate, pre-existing distortions. The optimal pollutiontax should therefore lie below the Pigovian tax. This paper pointsout that there is no real contradiction between these apparentlyopposing policy recommendations. It will be shown that the differencein the results appears because, implicitly, different definitionsof the second-best optimal pollution tax are chosen.

Second-best Environmental Taxation Distortionary Taxation Double-dividend Normalization 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Auerbach, Alan J. (1985). "The Theory of Excess Burden and Optimal Taxation." In Alan J. Auerbach and Martin Feldstein, eds., Handbook of Public Economics I, pp. 61–127.Google Scholar
  2. Atkinson, Anthony B. and Nicolas H. Stern. (1974). "Pigou, Taxation and Public Goods." Review of Economic Studies41, 119–128.Google Scholar
  3. Bovenberg, A. Lans and Ruud A. de Mooij. (1994). "Environmental Levies and DistortionaryTaxation." American Economic Review84, 1085–1089.Google Scholar
  4. Deaton, Angus and John Muellbauer. (1980). Economics of Consumer Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Diamond, Peter A. (1975). "A Many-Person Ramsey Tax Rule." Journal of Public Economics4, 335–342.Google Scholar
  6. Dixit, Avinash K. and Knud Jørgen Munk. (1977). "Welfare Effects of Tax and Price Changes: A Correction." Journal of Public Economics8, 103–107.Google Scholar
  7. Fullerton, Don. (1996). "Second Best Pollution Taxes." NBER Discussion Paper No. 5511, March, forthcoming in: American Economic Review.Google Scholar
  8. Goulder, Lawrence H. (1995). "Environmental Taxation and the "Double Dividend:" A Reader’s Guide." International Tax and Public Finance2, 157–184.Google Scholar
  9. Lee, Dwight R. and Walter S. Misiolek. (1986). "Substituting Pollution Taxation for General Taxation: Some Implications for Efficiency in Pollution Taxation." Journal of Environmental Economics and Management13, 338–347.Google Scholar
  10. Nichols, Albert L. (1984). Targeting Economic Incentives for Environmental Protection. Cambridge Mass. and London: MIT-Press.Google Scholar
  11. Oates, Wallace E. (1993). "Polluting Charges as a Source of Public Revenues." In Herbert Giersch, eds., Economic Progress and Environmental Concerns. Berlin: Springer, pp. 135–152.Google Scholar
  12. Parry, Ian W. H. (1995). "Pollution Taxes and Revenue Recycling." Journal of Environmental Economics and Management29, S64–S77.Google Scholar
  13. Pearce, David W. (1991). "The Role of Carbon Taxes in Adjusting to Global Warming." Economic Journal101, 938–948.Google Scholar
  14. Sandmo, Agnar. (1974). "A Note on the Structure of Optimal Taxation." American Economic Review64, 701–706.Google Scholar
  15. Sandmo, Agnar. (1975). "Optimal Taxation in the Presence of Externalities." Swedish Journal of Economics77, 86–98.Google Scholar
  16. Schöb, Ronnie. (1994). "Environmental Levies and Distortionary Taxation: Environmental View vs. Public Finance View." Department of Economics, University of Essex, Discussion Paper Series No. 436, November.Google Scholar
  17. Terkla, David. (1984). "The Efficiency Value of Effluent Tax Revenues." Journal of Environmental Economics and Management11, 107–123.Google Scholar
  18. Tullock, Gordon. (1967). "Excess Benefit." Water Resources Research3, 643–644.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ronnie Schöb
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of MunichMunich

Personalised recommendations