Abstract
In this article the presence of the rehabilitation goal in the policy of the prison system in the Netherlands will be discussed first. Particular attention will be paid to the question as to why the rehabilitation goal, in spite of the doubtfull status of its impact, still plays a role in the increasing instrumentalist policy of the Dutch criminal justice system. In addition, some limitations of a one-sided 'nothing works' approach of rehabilitation will be discussed. Next, empirical research is examined for what it teaches about the functioning of correctional programmes within the prison system. Special attention will be paid to the attitudes of inmates toward rehabilitation. It will be shown that in spite of a considerable body of research on institutional adaptation, little is known about the dynamics between inmates' attitudes and personal, situational and organisational background variables. In addition, the results of a survey, conducted on the nature and sources of inmates' attitudes towards rehabilitation, will be presented. Finally, this article will offer reflections on the benefits of a process-evaluative approach of correctional interventions.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Andrews, D.A., J. Bonta and R.D. Hoge, Classification for effective rehabilitation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17(1), pp. 19–52, 1990.
Antonowicz, D.H. and R. Ross, Essential components of successful rehabilitation programs for offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 38(2), pp. 97–105, 1994.
Blokland, L.J., Werken achter tralies(Doctoral Dissertation, G.U. Amsterdam). Amsterdam, 1974.
Boin, A., Het gevangeniswezen: naar een nieuwe balans tussen centrale controle en autonomie van inrichtingen. Sancties, (3), pp. 147–162, 1995.
Bonta, J. and P. Gendreau, Re-examining the cruel and unusual punishment of prison life. Law and Human Behavior, 14(4), pp. 347–372, 1990.
Boshier, R., Education Inside: Motives for Participation in Prison Education Programmes. Vancouver, BC: British Columbia University, 1983.
Brouwers, M. and M. Sampiemon, Vrouwen in detentie [Women in detention]. The Hague: Ministry of Justice/ WODC, 1988.
Conrad, J.P., A lost ideal, a new hope: the way toward effective correctional treatment. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 72(4), pp. 1699–1735, 1981.
Clemmer, D.,The Prison Community. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1958.
Cloward, R.A. et al., Social control in the prison. In: Theoretical Studies in Social Organization of the Prison. New York: Social Science Research Council, 1960.
Cullen F.T. and K.E. Gilbert, Reaffirming Rehabilitation. Cincinnati: Anderson Publishing, 1982.
Denkers, F.A.C.M., Criminologie en Beleid. Nijmegen: Dekker & van de Vegt, 1976.
DiIulio, J.J., Jr., No Escape: The Future of American Corrections. New York: Basic Books, 1991.
Garabedian, P.C., Social roles and processes of socialization in the prison community. Social Problems, 11, pp. 139–152, 1963.
Gendreau, P. and R.R. Ross, Effective correctional treatment: bibliotherapy for cynics. Crime and Delinquency, 25, pp. 463–489, 1979.
Goffman, E., Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates. Garden City, NJ: Anchor, 1961.
Grapendaal, M., B. van der Linden and A. Rook, Regiem in ontwikkeling. The Hague, Ministry of Justice/WODC, 1985.
Halleck, S.L. and A.D. Witte, Is rehabilitation dead? Crime and Delinquency, 23(4), pp. 372–382, 1977.
Hamm, M.S. and J.L. Schrink, The conditions of effective implementation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 16(2), pp. 166–182, 1989.
Heyder, A., Resocialisatie, een ideaal in de gevangenis. Deventer: Kluwer, 1966.
't Hart, A.C., Totale instituties en het totalitaire. Arnhem: Gouda Quint, 1993.
Herbschleb, M.D. and F. Zorge, Hoe zit het met de kwaliteit van de detentie in de Geerhorst?The Hague: Ministry of Justice, D. en J., Beleidsinformatie, 1992.
Irwin, J., The Felon. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1970.
Kelk, C., Recht voor gedetineerden. Alphen aan de Rijn: Samson, 1978.
Kelk, C., Het grote belang van een goed gestructureerde en rijke detentiefasering. Sancties, (2), pp. 69–82, 1993.
Kolstad, A., Imprisonment as Rehabilitation: Offenders' assessment of why it does not work. Journal of Criminal Justice, 24(4), pp. 323–335, 1996.
Krisberg, B., Utility of process evaluation: crime and delinquency programs. In: M.W. Klein and K.S. Teilmann (Eds), Handbook of Criminal Justice Evaluation, pp. 217–236. London: Sage, 1980.
Kuhn, A., Incarceration rates: Europe versusUSA. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 4(3), pp. 46–74, 1996.
Logan, C.H. and G.G. Gaes, Justice Quarterly, 10(2), pp. 245–264, 1993.
Lösel, F., Changing patterns in the use of prisons: an evidence-based perspective. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 4(3), pp. 108–128, 1996.
Martinson, R.,What Works? Questions and Answers about Prison Reform Public Interest, Spring, pp. 22–54, 1974.
Melk, G.D., Resocialisatie in de gevangenis. Delikt en Delinkwent, 15(8), pp. 749–766, 1985.
Melk, G.D., Is resocialisatie in de gevangenis mogelijk? Delikt en Delinkwent, 23(8), pp. 780–792, 1993.
Moerings, L.M., Recente ontwikkelingen in gevangeniswezen. Delikt en Delinkwent, 14(3), pp. 220–236, 1984.
Morris, T. and P. Morris, Pentonville: A Sociological Study of an English Prison. London: Routledge, 1963.
Palmer, T., Programmatic and non-programmatic aspects of successful intervention: new directions for research. Crime and Delinquency, 41(1), pp. 100–131, 1995.
Palmer, T., Martinson revisited. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 12, pp. 133–152, 1975.
Palmer, T., The effectiveness of intervention: recent trends and current issues. Crime and Delinquency, 37(3), pp. 330–346, 1991.
Parsons, M. and M. Langenbach, The reasons inmates indicate they participate in prison education programs: another look at Boshier's PEPS. Journal of Correctional Education, 44(1), pp. 38–41, 1993.
Patterson, W., Changing philosophies and prison management. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 21, pp. 214–227, 1988.
Quay, H.C., The three faces of evaluation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 4(4), pp. 341–355, 1977.
Ross, R.R., E.A. Fabiano and C.D. Ewles, Reasoning and rehabilitation. International Journal on Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, pp. 29–36, 1990.
Ryan, T.A., Literacy training and reintegration of offenders. Forum on Corrections, 3(1), pp. 17–23, 1991.
Sechrest, L., S.O. White and E.D. Brown, The Rehabilitation of Criminal Offenders Problems and Prospects. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, 1979.
Street, D., R. Vinter and Ch. Perrow, Organization for Treatment. New York: Free Press, 1966.
Sykes, G.M. and S.L. Messinger, The inmate social system. In: R. Cloward et al. (Eds), Theoretical Studies in Social Organization of the Prison. New York: Social Science Research Council, 1960.
Toch, H., Living in Prison: The Ecology of Survival. New York: Macmillan, 1977.
Tootoonchi, A., College education in prison: the inmates' perspectives. Federal Probation, 57(4), pp. 34–40, 1993.
van der Linden, B., Middellanggestraften; een vergelijking van twee gevangenisregiems. The Hague: Ministry of Justice/WODC, 1981.
Veringa, G.H., Tien jaar Beginselenwet; vrijheidsstraf, grenzen en mogelijkheden. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Criminologie. 5, pp. 131–148, 1963.
Warren, M.Q., Correctional treatment and coercion: The differential effectiveness perspective. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 4, pp. 335–376, 1977.
Whittington, J., Lifers, long-term prisoners and education. Prison Service Journal, (96), pp. 49–51, 1994.
Winters, C.A., Inmate opinions toward education and participation in prison education programmes. Police Journal, 68(1), pp. 39–50, 1995.
Wright, K.N., A study of individual, environmental, and interactive effects in explaining adjustment to prison. Justice Quarterly, 8(2), pp. 217–243, 1991.
Zamble, E. and F.J. Porporino, Coping, Behavior and Adaptation in Prison Inmates. New York: Springer, 1988.
Zamble, E. and F.J. Porporino, Coping, imprisonment and rehabilitation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17(1), pp. 53–70, 1990.
Zwezerijnen, J.J.A., Dwang en Vertrouwen. Alphen aan den Rijn: Samson, 1972.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nelissen, P.P. The Re-integration Process from the Perspective of Prisoners: Opinions, Percieved Value and Participation. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 6, 211–234 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008684525371
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008684525371