Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Property Rights and Biodiversity

  • Published:
European Journal of Law and Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This essay deals with the allocation of genetic resources with regard to property-rights theory. In addition to this, different arrangements of property rights will be examined as to their allocation and distribution effects. The result will show that property rights on biological diversity can only cover patrimonial rights which contain the right to use the resource but not to destroy it. Bioprospecting conventions, such as the well known Merck-INBio agreement, will be examined as mechanisms to establish property rights in terms of biological diversity. Moreover, the identification of these agreements will be critically questioned for their applicability as a form of the Coase-theorem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agius, E. (1993). “Our Responsibilities Towards Future Generations: Malta's Contribution,” Future Generations Journal, Nr. 11, 8-11,25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J. & Fisher A. C. (1974). “Environmental Preservation, Uncertainty and Irreversibility,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 88, 312-319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbier, E. B. (1994). “Priority Setting for Biodiversity Conservation.” In: OECD, 7-17.

  • Barbier, E. B., Burgess J. C. & Folke C. (1994). “Paradise Lost? The Ecological Economics of Biodiversity.” London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, S. (1996). “Economic Incentives for the Protection of Biological Diversity.” In: Siebert, H. (Ed.): Elemente einer rationalen Umweltpolitik. Tübingen (J.C.B. Mohr), 319-336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumann, M., Bell, J., Koechlin, F. & Pimbert M. (Eds.) (1996). “The Life Industry.” Biodiversity, people and profits. London (Intermediate Technology Publication).

  • Berkes, F. (Ed.) (1989). “Common Property Resources: Ecology and Community-Based Sustainable Development.” London (Belhaven Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F., Folke, C. & Gadgil M. (1995). “Traditional Ecological Knowledge, Biodiversity, Resilience and Sustainability.” In: Perrings et al. (Eds.), 281-299.

  • Binswanger, H. C. & J. Minsch (1992). “Theoretische Grundlagen der Ressourcenökonomie-Traditionelle und alternative Ansätze.” In: v. Hauff M.v. & U. Schmid (Eds.): Ökonomie und Ökologie. Stuttgart (Schäffer Poeschel), 41-66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, R. C. (1978).“ Endangered Species and Uncertainty: The Economics of a Safe Minimum Standard,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 61, 10-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, R. C. (1980). “Endangered Species: an Economic Perspective.” In: Transactions of the 45th North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference, 1980. Washington D.C. (Wildlife Management Institute), 208-218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, R. C. (1993). Economic Efficiency, Sustainability, and Biodiversity. Ambio 22, 69-73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, D. W. (1991). Environment and Economy: Property Rights and Public Policy. Oxford (Basil Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, D. W. (1994). “Property Rights, Economic Incentives, and Biodiversity Conservation.” In: OECD, 1994a, 18-22.

  • Bromley, D. W. (1997). “Property regimes in environmental economics.” In: Folmer, H. & T. Tietenberg (Eds.): The International Yearbook of Environmental and Resource Economics 1997/1998. Cheltenham Lyme (Edward Elgar), 1-27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C. (1973). “The Economics of Overexploitation,” Science, 181, 630-634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. (1960). “The Problem of Social Cost,” Law & Economics, 3, 1-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz, H. (1967). “Toward a Theory of Property Rights,” American Economic Review, 57, 347-359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durning, A. T. (1994). “Die Forstwirtschaft umgestalten.” In: Worldwatch Institute (Hrsg.): Zur Lage der Welt 1994. Frankfurt a.M. (Fischer Taschenbuch), 44-78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eger, T. (1995). Eine ökonomische Analyse von Langzeitverträgen. Marburg (Metropolis).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, P. & Ehrlich, A. (1981). “Extinction.” The Causes and Consequences of the Disappearance of Species. New York (Random House).

    Google Scholar 

  • Echeverría, J., Hanrahan, M. & Solórzano, R. (1995). “Valuation of non-priced amenities provided by the biological resources within the Monteverde Cloud Forest Preserve, Costa Rica.” Ecological Economics, 13, 43-52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farnsworth, N. R. (1988). Screening Plants for New Medicines. In: Wilson (Ed.), 83-97.

  • Farnsworth, N. R. (1990). “The role of ethnopharmacology in drug development.” In: Chadwick, D.J. & J. Marsh (Eds.): Bioactive Compounds from Plants. New York (John Wiley & Sons), 2-21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, J. (1987). “Information and the Coase Theorem,” Economic Perspectives, 1, 113-129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, A. C. & Hanemann, W. M. (1986). “Option Value and the Extinction of Species.” In: Smith, V. K. (Ed.): Advances in Applied Microeconomics. Greenwich, Conn. London (JAI Press), Vol. 4, 169-190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, A. C. & Hanemann, W. M. (1987). “Quasi-Option Value: Some Misconceptions Dispelled,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 14, 183-190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gollin, M. A. (1993). “An Intellectual Property Rights Framework for Biodiversity Prospecting.” In: Reid et al. (Eds.), 159-198.

  • Gren, I.-M., Folke, C., Turner, K. & Batemen, I. (1994). “Primary and Secondary Values of Wetland Ecosystems,” Environmental and Resource Economics, 4, 55-74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groombridge, B. (Ed.) (1992). “Global Biodiversity: Status of the Earth's Living Resources.” Compiled by World Conservation Monitoring Centre. London u.a. (Chapman & Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampicke, U. (1991). Naturschutzökonomie. Stuttgart (Ulmer).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampicke, U. (1994). “Ethics and Economics of Conservation,” Biological Conservation, 67, 219-231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanemann, W. M. (1988). “Economics and the Preservation of Biodiversity.” In: Wilson (Ed.), 193-199.

  • Hansen, S. (1989). “Debt for Nature Swaps-Overview and Discussion of Key Issues,” Ecological Economics, 1, 77-93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G. (1968). “The Tragedy of the Commons,” Science, 162, 1243-1248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houghton, R. A. (1993). “The Role of the World's Forests in Global Warming.” In: Ramakrishna, K. & G. M. Woodwell (Eds.): World Forests for the Future. Their Use and Conservation. New Haven London (Yale University Press), 21-58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, M. (1996). “The Body Shop model of bioprospecting.” In: Baumann et al. (Eds.), 110-114.

  • Joyce, C. (1991). “Prospectors for tropical medicines,” New Scientist, 19 October, 36-40.

  • Kloppenburg, J. R. Jr. (Ed.) (1988). “Seeds and Sovereignty,” The Use and Control of Plant Genetic Resources. Durham London (Duke University Press).

  • Kloppenburg, J. R. Jr. (1988a). “First the Seed: The political economy of plant biotechnology 1492-2000.” Cambridge u.a. (Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloppenburg, J. R. Jr. & D. L. Kleinman (1988). “Seeds of Controversity: National Property Versus Common Heritage.” In: Kloppenburg Jr. (Ed.), 173-203.

  • Krebs, A. (Ed.) (1997). “Naturethik.” Frankfurt a.M. (Suhrkamp).

    Google Scholar 

  • Krutilla, J. V. (1967). “Conservation Reconsidered.” The American Economic Review, 57, 777-786.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krutilla, J. V. & Fisher, A. (1975). “The Economics of Natural Environments.” Baltimore (John Hopkins University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Laird, S. A. (1993). “Contracts for Biodiversity Prospecting.” In: Reid et al. (Eds.), 99-130.

  • Lerch, A. (1994). “Property Rights und biologische Vielfalt,” Zeitschrift für Umweltpolitik und Umweltrecht, 17, 289-303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerch, A. (1995). “Biologische Vielfalt-ein ganz normaler Rohstoff?” In: Mayer (Ed.): EineWelt-Eine Natur? Der Zugriff auf die biologische Vielfalt und die Schwierigkeiten, lobal gerecht mit ihrer Nutzung umzugehen. Loccumer Protokolle Nr. 66/94. Rehburg-Loccum (Ev. Akademie Loccum), 33-62.

  • Lerch, A. (1996). “Verfügungsrechte und biologische Vielfalt.” Eine Anwendung der ökonomischen Analyse der Eigentumsrechte auf die spezifischen Probleme genetischer Ressourcen. Marburg (Metropolis).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerch, A. (1996a). “Die Tragödie des Gemeineigentums-Zur Fragwürdigkeit eines berühmten Paradigmas.” Hamburger Jahrbuch für Wirtschafts-und Gesellschaftspolitik. Band 41.

  • Moran, D. & Pearce, D. W. (1994). “Economic Disincentives and Biodiversity Loss in OECD Countries.” In: OECD, 23-31.

  • Moran, D. & Osgood, D. (1994). “Debt for Nature Swaps and Biodiversity Conservation.” In: OECD, 6-13.

  • Myers, N. (1979). “The Sinking Ark,” A New Look at the Problem of Disappaering Species. New York (Pergamon).

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, N. (1983). “A Wealth of Wild Species.” Boulder (Westview Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, N. (1988). “Draining the Gene Pool: The Causes, Course, and Consequences of Genetic Erosion.” In: Kloppenburg Jr. (Ed.), 90-113.

  • Myers, N. (1989). “Loss of Biological Diversity and its Impact on Agriculture and Food Production.” In: Pimental, D. & C.W. Hall (Eds.): Food and Natural Resources. San Diego New York (Academic Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, N. (1992). “The Primary Source,” Tropical Forests & our Future. New York London (Norton & Company).

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, N. (1993). “Biodiversity and the Precautionary Principle,” Ambio, 22, 74-79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, N. (1995). “Tropical deforestration: population, poverty and biodiversity.” In: Swanson (Ed.) 111-122.

  • National Research Council, Board on Science and Technology for International Development (1992). “Conserving Biodiversity: A Research Agenda for Development Agencies.” Washington D.C. (National Academy Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nutzinger, H. G. (Ed.) (1996). “Naturschutz-Ethik-Ökonomie.” Marburg (Metropolis).

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1994). “Scoping Papers on International Incentives for Conservation of Biodiversity.” Environment Directorate ENV/EPOC/GEEI/BIO(94)1. Paris.

  • OECD (1994a). “Scoping Papers on National Issues in the use of Economic Incentives for Conservation of Biodiversity.” Environment Directorate ENV/EPOC/GEEI/BIO(94)2. Paris.

  • OECD (1997). “Investing in Biological Diversity.” The Cairns Conference. Paris (OECD Publications).

    Google Scholar 

  • Omang, J. (1987). “In the tropics, still roling back the rain forest primeval,” Smithsonian, 17, 56-67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1989). “Institutionelle Arrangements und das Dilemma der Allmende.” In: M. Glagow, H. Willke & H. Wiesenthal (Eds.): Gesellschaftliche Steuerungsrationalität und partikulare Handlungsstrategien. Pfaffenweiler (Centaurus), 199-234.

  • Ostrom, E. (1990). “Governing the Commons,” The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge (Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, T. (1977). “Conservation and Economic Efficiency.” Baltimore, Md. (Johns Hopkins University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D. W. (1993). “Economic Values and the Natural World.” London (Earthscan). Pearce, D. W. & Turner, R. K. (1990). “Economics of Natural Resources and the Environment.” New York u.a. (Harvester Wheatsheaf).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D. W. & Moran, D. (1994). “The Economic Value of Biological Diversity.” London (Earthscan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D. W., Adger, N. & Moran, D. (1995). “Debt and the Environment.” Scientific American, 272 (Nr.6), 28-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D. W. & Puroshothaman, S. (1995). “The economic value of plant-based pharmaceuticals.” In: Swanson (Ed.), 127-138.

  • Perrings, C., Mäler, K. G., Folke, C., Holling, C. S. & Jansson, B. O. (Eds.) (1995). “Biodiversity Loss: Economic and Ecological Issues.” Cambridge, U.K u.a. (Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrings, C., Mäler, K. G., Folke, C., Holling, C. S., & Jansson, B. O. (Eds.) (1995a). “Biodiversity Conservation.” Dordrecht (Kluwer Academic Publishers).

    Google Scholar 

  • Posey, D. A. (1993). “Indigenous Knowledge in the Conservation and Use of World Forests.” In: Ramakrishna & Woodwell (Eds.): World Forests for the Future. Their Use and Conservation. New Haven London (Yale University Press), 59-77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randhir, T. O. & Lee, J. G. (1996). “Managing local commons in developing economies: an institutional approach,” Ecological Economics, 16, 1-12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, W. V., Laird, S. A., Meyer, C. A., Gámez, R., Sittenfeld, A., Janzen, D. H., Gollin M. A. & Juma C. (Eds.) (1993). “Biodiversity Prospecting: Using Genetic Resources for Sustainable Development.” World Resources Institute.

  • Sedjo, R. A. (1988). “Property Rights and the Protection of Plant Genetic Resources.” In: Kloppenburg Jr. (Ed.), 293-314.

  • Sedjo, R. A. (1992). “Property Rights, Genetic Resources, and Biotechnological Change,” Journal of Law and Economics, 35, 199-213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedjo, R. A. (1992a). “Preserving Biodiversity as a Resource,” Resources, 106, 26-29.

  • Sedjo, R. A. (1992b). “Tropical Forests, Property Rights and Environmental Values: Economic Concepts and Real World Complexities.” Washington D.C. (Resources for the Furure).

  • Sedjo, R. A. (1994). “Contractual Agreements for Genetic Resources.” In: OECD, 14-19.

  • Sedjo, R. A. & Simpson, R. D. (1995). “Property rights, externalities and biodiversity.” In: Swanson (Ed.), 79-88.

  • Sheldon, J. W. & Balick, M. J. (1995). “Ethnobotany and the search for balance between use and conservation.” In: Swanson (Ed.), 45-64.

  • Simpson, R. D., Sedjo, R. A. & Reid, J. W. (1994). “Marginal Values and Conservation Incentives in the Commerzialization of Indigenous genetic Resources.” Paper delivered to the Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association. Boston (5. January).

  • Simpson, R. D., Sedjo, R. A. & Reid, J. W. (1996). “Valuing Biodiversity for Use in Pharmaceutical Research,” Journal of Political Economy, 104, 163-185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, R. D. & Sedjo, R. A. (1994). “Commercialization of indigenous genetic resources,” Contemporary Economic Policy, 12, 34-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soberón, J., Quadri, G. & Villalón, F. (1997). “Land Tenure and Natural Protected Areas: The Case of Mexico.” In: OECD, 195-206.

  • Stevenson, G. G. (1991). “Common Property Economics,” A General Theory and Land Use Applications. Cambridge (Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sittenfeld, A. & Gámez, R. (1993). “Biodiversity Prospecting by INBio.” In: Reid et al. (Eds.), 69-98.

  • Swanson, T. (1994). “The International Regulation of Extinction.” London (McMillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, T. (1994a). “Efficient Financial Mechanisms for Biodiversity Conservation.” In: OECD, 20-26.

  • Swanson, T. (Ed.) (1995). “Intellectual property rights and biodiversity conservation.” An interdisciplinary analysis of the values of medicinal plants. Cambridge (Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, T. (1995a). “The appropriation of evolution's values: an institutional analysis of intellectual property regimes and biodiversity conservation.” In: Swanson (Ed.), 141-175.

  • Swanson, T. (Ed.) (1995b). “The economics and ecology of biodiversity decline.” Cambridge (Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, T. (1996). “The reliance of northern economies on southern biodiversity: biodiversity as information,” Ecological Economics, 17, 1-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, T. (1997). “Global Action for Biodiversity.” An International Framework for Implementing the Convention on Biological Diversity. London (Earthscan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, T. & Barbier, E. B. (1992). “Economics for the Wilds.” Wildlife, Wildlands, Diversity and Development. London (Earthscan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R. K. (1992). “Sustainability: Principles and Practice.” In: Turner (Ed.): Sustainable Environmental Economics and Management. London (Belhaven Press), 3-34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R. K., Doktor, P. & Adger, N. (1994). “Sea-Level Rise & Coastal Wetlands in the U.K.: Mitigation Strategies for Sustainable Management.” In: Jansson et al. (Eds.): Investing in Natural Capital. The Ecological Economics Approach to Sustainability. Washington D.C. Covelo (Island Press), 266-290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, J. H. (1994). “Genes for Sale: Privatization as a Conservation Policy.” Oxford u.a. (Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Walden, I. (1995). “Preserving biodiversity: the role of property rights.” In: Swanson (Ed.), 176-197.

  • Weisbrod, B. A. (1964). “Collective-Consumption Services of Individualized Consumption Goods,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 78, 471-477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. (Ed.) (1988). “Biodiversity.” Washington D.C. (National Academy Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerner, C. & Kennedy, K. (1996). “Equity issues in bioprospecting.” In: Baumann et al. (Eds.), 96-109.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics, University Kassel, USA

    Achim Lerch

Authors
  1. Achim Lerch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lerch, A. Property Rights and Biodiversity. European Journal of Law and Economics 6, 285–304 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008662329540

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008662329540

Search

Navigation