Skip to main content

Detection of Erwinia herbicola pv. gypsophilae in gypsophila plants by PCR

Abstract

Three PCR primer pairs, based on the cytokinins (etz) or IAA biosynthetic genes, were used for detecting Erwinia herbicola pv. gypsophilae in Gypsophila paniculata plants. The primers were specific to all gall-forming E. herbicola strains and distinguished them from saprophytic strains associated with gypsophila plants or from other gall-forming bacteria. In pure culture of the pathogen, less than one bacterial cell was detected with nested PCR using the etz primers - an increase of 100-fold in sensitivity as compared with single-round PCR. In the presence of plant extract a reduction of tenfold in sensitivity was observed by nested PCR. When cells were grown on a semi-selective medium prior to PCR (Bio-PCR), five cells from pure culture of the pathogen were detected. The bacteria could be detected by nested-PCR or Bio-PCR in symptomless gypsophila cuttings after 7 days. The Bio-PCR procedure described in this study can be used to establish disease-free nuclear stock of mother plants of gypsophila.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Brown NA (1934) A gall similar to crown gall produced on Gypsophilaby a new bacterium. J. Agric. Res. 48: 1099-1112

    Google Scholar 

  2. Burr TJ, Katz BH, Abawi GS and Crosier DC (1991) Comparison of tumorigenic strains of Erwinia herbicolaisolated from table beet with E.h. gypsophila. Plant Dis. 75: 855-858

    Google Scholar 

  3. Clark E, Vigodsky-Haas H and Gafni Y (1989) Characteristics in tissue culture of hyperplasias induced by Erwinia herbicolapathovar gypsophilae. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 35: 383-390

    Google Scholar 

  4. Clark E, Manulis S, Ophir Y, Barash I and Gafni Y (1993) Cloning and characterization of iaaM and iaaH from Erwinia herbicolapathover gypsophilae. Phytopathology 83: 234-240

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cooksey DA (1986) Galls of Gypsophila paniculatacaused by Erwinia herbicola. Plant Dis. 70: 464-468

    Google Scholar 

  6. Demeke T and Adams RP (1992) The effects of plant polysaccharides and buffer additives of PCR. Biotechniques 12: 332-334

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hartung JS, Pruvost OP, Villemot I and Alvarez A (1996) Rapid and sensitive colorimetric detection of Xanthomonas axonopodispv. citri by immunocapture and a nested-polymerase chain reaction assay. Phytopathology 86: 95-101

    Google Scholar 

  8. Henson JM and French R (1993) The polymerase chain reaction and plant disease diagnosis. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 31: 81-109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kapperud G, Vardund T, Skjerve E, Hornes E and T. Michaelson T (1993) Detection of pathogenic Yersinia enterocoliticain foods and water by immunomagnetic separation, nested polymerase chain reactions and colorimetric detection of amplified DNA. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59: 2938-2944

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Levy L, Lee I-M and Hadidi A (1994) Simple and rapid preparation of infected plant tissue extracts for PCR amplification of virus, viroid, and MLO nucleic acids. J. Virol. Methods 49: 295-304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lichter, A, Barash I, Valinsky L and Manulis S (1995) The genes involved in cytokinin biosynthesis in Erwinia herbicolapv. gypsophilae: characterization and role in gall formation. J. Bacteriol. 177: 4457-4465

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Manulis S, Gafni Y, Clark E, Zutra D, Ophir Y and Barash I (1991) Identification of a plasmid DNA probe for detection of strains of Erwinia herbicolapathogenic on Gypsophila paniculata.Phytopathology 81: 54-57

    Google Scholar 

  13. Manulis S (1992) Evaluation of a DNA probe for the detection of Erwinia herbicolastrains pathogenic on Gypsophila paniculata. Plant Pathol. 41: 342-347

    Google Scholar 

  14. Maoz A and Vigodsky-Haas H (1983) Development of a serodiagnostic method for gall-forming bacteria in gypsophila. (Abstr.) Phytoparasitica 11: 239-240

    Google Scholar 

  15. McManus PS and Jones AL (1995) Detection of Erwinia amylovoraby nested PCR and PCR-dot-blot and reverse-blot hybridizations. Phytopathology 85: 618-623

    Google Scholar 

  16. Minsavage GV, Thompson CM, Hopkins DL, Leite RMVB and Stall RE (1994) Development of a polymerase chain reaction protocol for detection of Xylella fastidiosain plant tissure. Phytopathology 84: 456-461

    Google Scholar 

  17. Morgan JAW, Winstanley C, Pickup RW and Saunders JR (1991) Rapid immunocapture of Pseudomonas putidacells from lake water by using bacterial flagella. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 57: 503-509

    Google Scholar 

  18. Morris RO (1986) Genes specifying auxin and cytokinin biosynthesis in phytopathogens. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 37: 509-538

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schaad NW, Cheong SS, Tamaki S, Hatziloukas E and Panopoulos NJ (1995) A combined biological and enzymatic amplification (BIO-PCR) technique to detect Pseudomonas syringaepv. phaseolicola in bean seed extracts. Phytopathology 85: 243-248

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shilo R (1985) Gypsophila paniculata. In: Halevy A (ed) Handbook of Flowering (pp.83-87) CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fl.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Star MP (1982) The genus Erwinia. In: Star MP, Stolp H, Truper HG, Balows A and Schlegel HG (eds) The Prokaryotes: A Handbook on Habitats. Isolation and Identification of Bacteria. Vol. 2 (pp.1260-1271) Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  22. Vigodsky-Haas H, Sharoni M, Zutra D, Farkas E and Kirshner B (1981) Crown gall of Gypsophila paniculata. (Abstr.). Phytoparasitica 9: 253

    Google Scholar 

  23. Volcani Z (1985) Bacterial Diseases of Plants in Israel. Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan, Israel 388 pp.(in Hebrew)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Manulis, S., Kogan, N., Valinsky, L. et al. Detection of Erwinia herbicola pv. gypsophilae in gypsophila plants by PCR. European Journal of Plant Pathology 104, 85–91 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008659001313

Download citation

  • Bio-PCR
  • diagnosis
  • galls
  • nested-PCR