Skip to main content
Log in

Testing variability in pathogenicity of Phytophthora cinnamomi

  • Published:
European Journal of Plant Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Forty eight isolates of Phytophthora cinnamomi from various host plants in France (35 isolates) and in other countries were tested for pathogenicity. Seedlings of chestnut, northern red oak, pine and eucalyptus were infected by soil contamination. Taproots, stems and bark strips of plants of chestnut and different oak species were inoculated with mycelium agar disks. Results of the different experiments were in good agreement. All isolates appeared pathogenic to all the different test species but with variable levels of virulence. Isolates with consistent low or high level of virulence, which could be used as standards in further studies, were identified. Interaction between P. cinnamomi isolates and host plant species was significant in terms of lesion lengths. These interactions could not be related to host from which P. cinnamomi was isolated. Consistent with this, in Quercus rubra, the isolate-provenance interaction was not significant. This feature is encouraging for provenance screening for resistance to P. cinnamomi in this species. The variation in virulence was not related to other isolate characteristics (mating type, electrophoretic type, age).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brasier CM (1992) Evolutionary biology of Phytophthora. Part 1: genetic system, sexuality and the generation of variation. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 30: 135-171

    Google Scholar 

  • Brasier CM, Robredo and Ferraz JFP (1993) Evidence for Phytophthora cinnamomiinvolvement in Iberian oak decline. Plant pathology 42: 140-145

    Google Scholar 

  • Brasier C (1996) Phytophthora cinanmomiand oak decline in southern Europe. Environmental constraints including climate change. Ann. Sci. For. 53: 347-358

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrt P and Grant B (1979) Some conditions governing zoospores production in axenic culture of Phytophthora cinanmomi. Aust. J. Bot. 27: 103-115

    Google Scholar 

  • Chee KH and Newhook FJ (1965) Variability in Phytophthora cinnamomiRands. N. Z. J. Agric. Res. 8: 947-950

    Google Scholar 

  • Crandall BS, Gravatt GF and Ryan MM (1945) Root disease of Castaneaspecies and some coniferous and broadleaf nursery stocks, caused by Phytophthora cinnamomi. Phytopathology 35: 162-180

    Google Scholar 

  • Desprez-Loustau ML and Dupuis F (1994) Spatial distribution and pathogenicity of Phytophthora cinnamomiisolates originating from soil of an infested red oak stand. In: Diseases and insects in forest nurseries: (pp 79-91). Les colloques n∘ 68. (ed) by Perrin and Sutherland, INRA

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon KW, Thinlay, Sivasithamparam K (1984). Technique for rapid assessment of tolerance of banksia spp. To root rot caused by Phytophthora cinnamomi. Plant Disease 68(12): 1077-1080

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudzinski MJ, Old KM and Gibbs RJ (1993) Pathogenic variability in Australian isolates of Phythophthora cinnamomi. Aust. J. Bot. 41(6): 721-732

    Google Scholar 

  • Linde C, Drenth A, Kemp GHJ, Wingfield MJ and von Broembsen SL (1997) Population structure of Phytophthora cinnamomiin South Africa. Phytopathology 87: 822-827

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning WJ and Crossan DF (1966 a) Variation in degree of pathogenicity of isolates of Phytophthora cinnamomi to cultivars of Taxus. Plant Disease Reporter 50(2): 84-87

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning WJ and Crossan DF (1966 b) Evidence for variation in degree of pathogenicity of isolates of Phytophthora cinnamomito broadleaf and coniferous evergreens. Plant Disease Reporter 50(9): 647-649

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks GC, Smith IW and Kassaby FY (1981). Trunk infection of Eucalypt species by Phytophthora cinnamomi. Aust. J. For. Res. 11: 257-267

    Google Scholar 

  • Matheron ME and Matejka JC (1989) Temporal changes in susceptibility of citrus phloem tissue to colonization by Phytophthora citrophthoraand P. parasitica. Plant Disease 73: 408-411

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreau C and Moreau M (1952) Etude mycologique de la maladie de l’encre du chêne. Rev. Pathol. Veg. 31: 201-231

    Google Scholar 

  • Old KM, Moran GF and Bell JC. (1983) Isozyme variability among isolates of Phytophthora cinnamomifrom Australia and Papua New Guinea. Can. J. Bot. 62: 2016-2022

    Google Scholar 

  • Old KM, Dudzinski MJ and Bell JC (1988) Isozyme variability in field populations of Phytophthora cinnamomiin Australia. Aust. J. Bot. 36: 355-360

    Google Scholar 

  • Oudemans P and Coffey MD (1991) Isozyme comparison within and among worldwide sources of three morphologically distinct species of Phytophthora. Mycol. Res. 95(1): 19-30

    Google Scholar 

  • Podger FD (1989) Comparative pathogenicity of fourteen Australian isolates of Phythophthora cinnamomidetermined on transplants of Tasmanian temperate heathland. Aust. J. Bot. 37: 491-500

    Google Scholar 

  • Robin C (1991). La maladie de l’encre du chêne rouge Quercus rubraL. causée par Phytophthora cinnamomiRands: perspectives pour l’amélioration génétique de la résistance. Ph. D. Université de Bordeaux II, pp. 140

  • Robin C (1992) Trunk inoculations of Phytophthora cinnamomiin red oaks.1992. Eur. J. For. Path. 22(2-3): 157-165

    Google Scholar 

  • Robin C, Desprez-Loustau ML and Delatour C. (1992) Spatial and temporal enlargement of cankers of Phytophthora cinnamomiin red oak. Can. J. For. Res. 22: 3: 362-366

    Google Scholar 

  • Robin C, Dupuis F, Desprez-Loustau, ML (1994) Seasonal changes in northern red oak susceptibility to Phytophthora cinnamomi. Plant Disease 78: 369-374

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc. (1989) SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 6, Fourth Edition, Volume 2, Cary, NC, USA, pp: 891-996

    Google Scholar 

  • Salesses G and Chapa J (1993) Screening and breeding for ink disease resistance. Proceedings of the International Congress of Chestnut. Spoleto, October 20-23, pp. 545-549

  • Shaner G, Stromberg EL, Lacy GH, Barker KR, Pirone TP. (1992). Nomenclature and concepts of pathogenicity and virulence. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 30: 47-66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shearer BL and Tippett JT (1989) Jarrah dieback: the dynamics and management of Phytophthora cinnamomiin the Jarrah (Eucalyptus marginata) forest of South-western Australia. CALM, Research Bulletin 3, pp. 75

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgesson DC (1954) Root rot of Lawson cypress and other ornamentals caused by Phytophthora cinnamomi. Contrib. Boyce Thompson Inst. 17: 359-373

    Google Scholar 

  • Vegh I and Bourgeois M (1975) Données préliminaires sur l’étiologie du dépérissement des conifères d’ornement dans les pépinières françaises; rôle de Phythophthora cinnamomiRands. Pepinier. Hortic. Maraich 153: 39-49

    Google Scholar 

  • White RP (1937) Rhododendron wilt and root rot. N. J. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 615 pp. 32

    Google Scholar 

  • Weste G (1975) Pathogenicity of Phytophthora cinnamomitowards Nothofagus cunninghamii Aust. J. Bot. 23: 277-285

    Google Scholar 

  • Zentmyer GA (1980) Phytophthora cinnamomiand the diseases it causes. Monograph. n∘ 10. American Phytopathological Society, St Paul, Minnesota, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Zentmyer GA and Guillemet FB (1981) Evidence for strains of Phytophthora cinnamomi. Plant disease 65: 475-477

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Robin, C., Desprez-Loustau, ML. Testing variability in pathogenicity of Phytophthora cinnamomi. European Journal of Plant Pathology 104, 465–475 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008649806620

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008649806620

Navigation