Skip to main content
Log in

Collaborative Writing Is Hard to Support: A Field Study of Collaborative Writing

  • Published:
Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper documents the results of a field test of Instant Update, a collaborative writing tool by a geographically dispersed department at the MITRE Corporation. Thirty-six participants were given Instant Update software and free training and support in exchange for their cooperation with data collection. These participants spent a great deal of time writing and communicating with each other about their written work. They began the pilot test with enthusiasm, using Instant Update for many types of documents and anticipating many benefits. After three months of experience they rated the actual benefits they received from the software lower than they had expected. Their usage became much more refined. They continued to use it for some types of documents, but stopped for others. The collaborative writing software was used successfully to create joint documents that have a consistent format and are produced on a regular basis (such as weekly activity reports) and for documents that provide access to shared information (such as a vacation calendar). It was used less successfully for the production of documents that require a complex work flow and have a changing group of contributors. We concluded that although collaborative writing is difficult to support and the currently available collaborative writing tools need to be improved before they can meet the needs of most co-writers, they are adequate for some types of tasks. Documents that are well defined and are created by experienced users who can cooperate well can benefit from the currently available tools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baecker, R., D. Nastos, I. Posner, and K. Mawby (1993): The User-Centered Iterative Design of Collaborative Writing Software. In Proceedings of InterCHI 93, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 24-29 April, 1993, pp. 399–405.

  • Beck, E. and V. Bellotti (1993): Informed Opportunism as Strategy: Supporting Coordination in Distributed Collaborative Writing. In G. de Michelis, C. Simone, and K. Schmidt (eds.): ECSCW '93. Proceedings of the European Conference of Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Milan, Italy. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 233–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullen, C. and J. Bennett (1990): Learning from User Experience with Groupware. In CSCW 90. Proceedings of the Conference of Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Los Angeles, CA. New York: ACM, pp. 291–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ede, L. and A. Lunsford (1990): Singular Texts/Plural Authors.Carbondale: Southern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, C., S. Gibbs, and G. Rein (1992): Groupware: Some Issues and Experiences. In D. Marca and G. Bock (eds.): Groupware: Software for Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Washington: IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 23–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galegher, J. and R. Kraut (1992): Computer-Mediated Communication and Collaborative Writing: Media Influence and Adaptation to Communication Constraints. In John Turner and Robert Kraut (eds.): CSCW 92. Proceedings of the Conference of Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Toronto, Canada, October 31 to November 4, 1992, New York: ACM, pp. 155–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galegher, J. and R. Kraut (1990): Computer-Mediated Communication for Intellectual Teamwork: A Field Experiment in Group Writing. In CSCW 90. Proceedings of the Conference of Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Los Angeles, CA. New York: ACM, pp. 65–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, S. (1991): Personalizable Groupware: Accommodating Individual Roles and Group Differences. In ECSCW '91. Proceedings of the European Conference of Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 17–31.

  • Grudin, J. (1994): Eight Challenges for Developers. Communications of the ACM, vol. 37, pp. 93–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grudin, J. (1988): Why CSCW Applications Fail: Problems in the Design and Evaluation of Organizational Interfaces. In CSCW 88. Proceedings of the Conference of Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 85–93.

  • Haake, J. and B. Wilson (1992): Supporting Collaborative Writing of Hyperdocuments in SEPIA. In John Turner and Robert Kraut (eds.): CSCW 92. Proceedings of the Conference of Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Toronto, Canada, October 31 to November 4, 1992, New York: ACM, pp. 138–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraut, R., J. Galegher, and C. Egido, C. (1988): Relationships and Tasks in Scientific Research Collaborations. Human Computer Interaction, vol. 3, pp. 31–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraut, R., J. Galegher, R. Fish, and B. Chalfonte (1992): Task Requirements and Media Choice in Collaborative Writing. Human Computer Interaction, vol. 7, pp. 375–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, I. and M. Mantei (1991): Idea Management in a Shared Drawing Tool. InECSCW'91. Proceedings of the European Conference of Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 97–112.

  • McCarthy, J., V., Miles, and A. Monk (1991): An Experimental Study of Common Ground in Text-Based Communication. In Proceedings of CHI '91, New Orleans, Louisiana. New York: ACM, pp. 209–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minor, S. and B. Magnusson (1993): A Model for Semi-(A)Synchronous Collaborative Editing. In G. de Michelis, C. Simone, and K. Schmidt (eds.): ECSCW '93. Proceedings of the European Conference of Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Milan, Italy.Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 219–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuwirth, C., R. Chadhok, D. Kaufer, P. Erion, J. Morris, and D. Miller (1992): Flexible Diff-ing in a Collaborative Writing System. In John Turner and Robert Kraut (eds.): CSCW 92. Proceedings of the Conference of Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Toronto, Canada, October 31 to November 4, 1992, New York: ACM, pp. 147–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuwirth, C., D. Kaufer, R. Chadhok, and J. Morris (1990): Issues in the Design of Computer Support for Co-Authoring and Commenting. In CSCW 90. Proceedings of the Conference of Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Los Angeles, CA. New York: ACM, pp. 183–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, I. and R. Baecker (1992): How People Write Together. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1992, pp. 127–138.

  • Rappaport, D. (1992): Will Groupware Revolutionize the Way We Work?, Business Communications Review, vol. 22, pp. 47–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sasse, M., M. Handley, and S. Chuang (1993): Support for Collaborative Authoring via Email: The MESSIE Environment. In G. de Michelis, C. Simone, and K. Schmidt (eds.): ECSCW '93. Proceedings of the European Conference of Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Milan, Italy. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 249–264.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tammaro, S.G., Mosier, J.N., Goodwin, N.C. et al. Collaborative Writing Is Hard to Support: A Field Study of Collaborative Writing. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 6, 19–51 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008636321493

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008636321493

Navigation