Skip to main content
Log in

How Well Are Authorities Suited to Prevent Damage to the Environment?

  • Published:
European Journal of Law and Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Environment protection in Austria is still carried out mainly by public authorities. This article focuses on preventive measures. It takes up the approval of new or rebuilt plants according to the Trade Act as an illustration for a considerable number of similar procedures. Although there is an ongoing discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of those procedures, no attempt has been made yet to examine their contents from a strictly economic perspective. Therefore, the article extracts the economic consequences from the wording of the law and examines whether they can give rise to efficient environment protection, taking into consideration the goals and constraints of all the participants in the negotiations. It is found that in principle the procedure allows for efficient solutions, despite the disadvantages, which are frequently observed in the course of its application. Moreover, it is argued that some features of the procedure, such as the selection of an appropriate techn ology on behalf of an applicant as well as negotiations with the potential pollutees have not yet been interpreted correctly. An assessment against more market-orientated measures, which are favored nowadays, ought to take into consideration that they generally cannot be implemented without support from the government.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, D.W. (1991). “What Are Transaction Costs?” In R.O. Zerbe, Jr. and V.P. Goldberg (eds.), Research in Law and Economics (vol. 14) (pp. 1–18) Greenwich, CT

  • Ashworth, J., and I. Papps. (1991). “Should Environmental Legislation Set the Rules Constraining Polluters?” In W. Weigel (ed.), Economic Analysis of Law: A Collection of Applications (p. 83–89) Vienna

  • Beirat für Wirtschafts-und Sozialfragen. (1986). Umweltpolitik. Vienna

  • Bongaerts, J. C., and D. Heinrichs. (1984). “Environment Protection Legislation and Environmental Protection Investments by West German Manufacturing Industry.” International Institute for Environment and Society Discussion Papers 84–13. Berlin.

  • Buchanan, J. (1973). “The Institutional Structure of Externality,” Public Choice 14, 69–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundesminister für Umwelt Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit, (1992). Entwurf einer Verordnung Änderung der Vierten Verordnung zur Durchführung des Bundes-Immissionsschutzgesetzes: (“Beschleunigungsgesetz”), Bonn, November.

  • City of Graz (ed.). (1992). ökoprofit. Graz.

  • Coase, R. (1960). “The Problem of Social Cost,” Journal of Law and Economics 3, 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooter, R., and T. Ulen. (1988). Law and Economics. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlmann, C.J. (1979). “The Problem of Externality,” Journal of Law and Economics 22, 141–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellickson, R.C. (1990). “Three Systems of Land Use Control,” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 13, 67–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwurf eines Bundesgesetzes über die Haftung für Umweltschäden. (1991). JMZ 7720/72–1 2/91. Vienna, December.

  • Eschenbach, R., and C. Müller (eds.). (1992). Umweltmanagement in Österreich. Vienna

  • Federal Environmental Agency. (1994). UVE-Leitfaden, Eine Information zur Umweltverträglichkeitserklärung. Vienna.

  • Gewerbeordnung. (1973). BGB1. 1974/50 and Amendments.

  • Gimpel-Hinteregger, M. (1994). Grundfragen der Umwelthaftung. Vienna

  • Gladt, K.W. (1992). Betriebsanlagen und ihre Nachbarn im gewerblichen Genehmigungsverfahren. Vienna

  • Kodex des österreichischen Rechts. (1992). Umweltrecht (3rd ed.). Vienna

  • Kommission der Europäischen Gemeinschaften. (1992). “Für eine dauerhafte und umweltgerechte Entwicklung.” Kom (92)23 endg. Vol. II, Brussels.

  • Nentjes, “Enforcement of Environmental Regulation.” In W. Weigel (ed.), Economic Analysis of Law: A Collection of Applications (pp. 54–65). Vienna 1991, pp. 54–65.

  • Olson, M. (1965). The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA

  • Orzechowski, W. (1977). “Economic Models of Bureaucracy: Survey, Extensions, and Evidence”. T.E. Borcherding (ed.), Budgets and Bureaucrats: The Sources of Government Growth (pp. 229–259). Durham, NC

  • Polinsky, M. and D.L. Rubinfeld. (1986), “A Note on Optimal Public Enforcement with Settlement and Litigation Costs.” Program in Law and Economics Working Paper No. 88–7. University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raschauer, B. (1988). Umweltschutzrecht. Vienna

  • Rob, R. (1989). “Pollution Claim Settlements under Private Information,” Journal of Economic Theory 47, 307–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzer, S. (1992). Die Genehmigung von Betriebsanlagen. Vienna

  • Shavell, S. (1992). “The Optimal Structure of Law Enforcement.” Program in Law and Economics Discussion Paper No. 112, Cambridge, MA.

  • Sweeney, G. (1981). “Adoption of Cost Saving Innovations by a Regulated Firm,” American Economic Review 71, 437–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weigel, W. (1984). “Zum Stand der ökonomischen Bürokratiediskussion,” Wirtschaftspolitische Blätter, 18–29.

  • Weimann, J. (1991). Umweltökonomik (2nd ed.). New York: Berlin-Heidelberg.

  • Welser Abfallverwertung Gesellschaft m.b.H. (1991). “Bürgerbeteiligungsverfahren, Informationsbroschüre.” Mimeo, Wels.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weigel, W. How Well Are Authorities Suited to Prevent Damage to the Environment?. European Journal of Law and Economics 4, 23–40 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008627211479

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008627211479

Navigation