Skip to main content
Log in

Genetics of tomato spotted wilt virus resistance coming from Lycopersicon peruvianum

  • Published:
European Journal of Plant Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

New resistance sources coming from Lycopersicon peruvianum, especially those introgressed in UPV 32 line, are studied. UPV 32 resistance is controlled by a single gene. Resistance and dominance levels of this gene are conditioned by thrips transmission and isolate aggressiveness. A partial overcoming of resistance occurs due to the incomplete penetrance of the gene. Incomplete dominance of resistance also happens, which suggests gene dosage dependence. UPV 32 gene segregates independently of both Sw-5 gene and UPV 1 resistance gene, also coming from Lycopersicon peruvianum. It is proposed to name Sw-6 this new locus from UPV 32. Sw-5 gene and UPV 1 resistance gene show higher resistance than Sw-6. Heterozygotes for UPV 1 resistance gene were more resistant than heterozygotes for Sw-5. The lower dependence of UPV 1 resistance gene on the gene dosage effect makes it very useful for the development of commercial hybrids.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abad P (1996) Tomato spotted wilt virus: dinámica de la enfermedad y caracterización de aislados. PhD Thesis. Polytechnic University of Valencia, Spain

    Google Scholar 

  • Beier H, Bruening G, Russell M and Tucker C (1979) Replication of cowpea mosaic virus in protoplast isolated from immune lines of cowpeas. Virology 95: 165-175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boiteux LS and Giordano L de B (1992) Screening Lycopersicongermplasm for resistance to a Brazilian isolate of tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV). TGC Report 42: 13-14

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark MF and Adams AN (1977) Characteristics of the microplate method of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the detection of plant viruses. J Gen Virol 34: 475-483

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cuartero J, Nuez F and Díaz A (1984) Catalog of collections of Lycopersiconand L. pennelliifrom northwest of Peru. TGC Report 34: 43-46

    Google Scholar 

  • de Avila AC (1992) Diversity of tospoviruses. PhD Thesis. Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen, the Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • de Haan P (1991) Exploring and exploiting the RNA genome of Tomato spotted wilt virus. PhD Thesis. Wageningen, the Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Díez MJ, Roselló S, Jordá C, Lacasa A, Costa J and Nuez F (1995) Agronomic behaviour of resistant tomato cvs and lines to TSWV and influence of inoculation methods. Acta Hortic 402: 527-532

    Google Scholar 

  • Finlay KW (1953) Inheritance of spotted wilt resistance in tomato. II. Five genes controlling spotted wilt resistance in four tomato types. Aust J Biol Sci 6: 153-163

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser RSS (1990) The genetics of resistance to plant viruses. Ann Rev Phytopathol 28: 179-200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes FO (1948) Resistance to spotted wilt in tomato. Phytopathology 38: 467-473

    Google Scholar 

  • Iizuka N, Boiteux LS, Giordano L de B, Nagata T and Dusi AN (1993) Sources of resistance to tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) in wild Lycopersiconspecies. TGC Report 43: 20-22

    Google Scholar 

  • Inoue-Nagata AK, Kormelink R, Nagata T, Kitajima EW, Goldbach R and Peters D (1997) Effects of temperature and host on the generation of Tomato spotted wilt virs defective interfering RNAs. Phytopathology 87: 1168-1173

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishna Kumar NK, Ullman DE and Cho JJ (1993) Evaluation of Lycopersicongermplasm for tomato spotted wilt tospovirus resistance by mechanical and thrips transmission. Plant Dis 77: 938-941

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar N and Irulappan I (1992) Inheritance of resistance to spotted wilt virus in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentumMill.) J Genet Breed 46: 113-118

    Google Scholar 

  • Little TM and Hills FJ (1978) Agricultural experimentation: Design and analysis. John Wiley and sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Maluf WR, Toma-Braghini M and Corte RD (1991) Progress in breeding tomatoes for resistance to tomato spotted wilt. Revista Brasileira de Genética 14: 509-525

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather K and Jinks JL (1971) Biometrical genetics. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Moury B, Palloix A, Gebre Selassie K and Marchoux G (1997) Hypersensitive resistance to tomato spotted wilt virus in three Capsicum chinense accessions is controlled by a single gene and is overcome by virulent strains. Euphytica 94: 45-52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nolasco G, García de Blas C, Torres V and Ponz F (1993) A method combining immunocapture and PCR amplification in a microtiter plate for the detection of plant viruses and subviral pathogens. J Virol Methods 45: 201-218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paterson RG, Scott SJ and Gergerich RC (1989) Resistance in two Lycopersiconspecies to an Arkansas isolate of tomato spotted wilt virus. Euphytica 43: 173-178

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponz F and Bruening G (1986) Mechanisms of resistance to plant viruses. Ann Rev Phytopathol 24: 355-381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rick CM (1979) Biosystematic studies in Lycopersicon and closely related species of solanum. In: Hawkes JG, Lester RN and Skelding AD (eds) The biology and Taxonomy of the Solanaceae (pp 266-278) Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Roselló S, Díez MJ and Nuez F (1996) Viral diseases causing the greatest economic losses to the tomato crop. I. The Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus (TSWV)-A review. Scientia Horticulturae 67: 117-150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roselló S, Díez MJ, Lacasa A, Jordá C and Nuez F (1997) Testing resistance to TSWV introgressed from Lycopersicon peruvianumby artificial transmission techniques. Euphytica 98: 93-98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakimura K (1962) The present status of thrips-borne viruses. In: Maramorosch K (ed) Biological transmission of disease agents (pp 33-40) Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuel G, Bald JG and Pitman HA (1930) Spotted wilt of tomatoes. Aust Coun Sci Ind Res Bull 44

  • Stevens MR, Scott SJ and Gergerich RC (1992) Inheritance of a gene for resistance to tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) from Lycopersicon peruvianumMill. Euphytica 59: 9-17

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullman DE, German TL, Sherwood JL, Westcot DM and Cantone FA (1993) Tospovirus replication in insect vector cells. Immuno-cytochemical evidence that the nonstructural protein encoded by S RNA of tomato spotted wilt tospovirus is present in thrips vector cells. Phytopathology 83: 456-463

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanderplank JE (1968) Disease resistance in plants. Academic Press. New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Gessel MJ and Coble HD (1993) Effect of nitrogen and moisture stress on severity of Maize dwarf mosaic virus infection in corn seedlings. Plant Dis 77: 489-491

    Google Scholar 

  • van Loon LC (1975) Polyacrylamide disk electrophoresis of the soluble leaf proteins from Nicotiana tabacumvar "samsun’ and "samsun NN’ III: Influence of temperature and virus strain on changes induced by tobacco mosaic virus. Physiol Plant Pathol 6: 289-300

    Google Scholar 

  • Wijkamp I, van Lent J, Kormelink R, Goldbach R and Peters D (1993) Multiplication of tomato spotted wilt virus in its insect vector, Frankliniella occidentalis. J Gen Virol 74: 341-349

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wijkamp I, Goldbach R and Peters D (1995) Distinct levels of speci-ficity in thrips transmission of Tospoviruses. Phytopathology 85: 1069-1074

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roselló, S., Díez, M.J. & Nuez, F. Genetics of tomato spotted wilt virus resistance coming from Lycopersicon peruvianum. European Journal of Plant Pathology 104, 499–509 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008622128504

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008622128504

Navigation