Abstract
Both cybernetic and self-organizing, purposeful complex adaptive systems (PCAS) express purpose by solving problems defined by choosing and delivering values to participants as operational goals through decision making. Individuals, groups, organizations, and economies are PCAS. Here we focus on indviduals and groups. Evolutionary Systems Design (ESD) is a universal (culture independent) general problem solving, formal modeling/design framework for PCAS that can be computer implemented in same time/same place or telework modes. Formally, in ESD sets of elements and their relations modeling a PCAS evolve through cybernetics/self organization. Spirituality and the concept of right decision/negotiation in PCAS are discussed in relation to consciousness. Rightness comes from spirituality, i.e., consciousness experiencing oneness. Oneness is integrally bound with love; hence the term oneness/love. Through right decision/negotiation PCAS try to realize their ultimate purpose to live Two (the relative, the process of all there is) as One (the absolute, all there is). Oneness/love, connectedness to One, promotes problem solving and negotiation - expressed formally in the ESD problem representation - that is at the same time right. Simply put, right problem solving requires oneness/love and delivers oneness/love. Computer and receiver modes of consciousness are discussed in relation to oneness/love and its absence experienced as separateness/fear. Ways to transit from the latter to the former are considered. P.L. Yu's Habitual Domain (HD) framework is introduced and discussed in relation to ESD. Evolutionary heuristics for evolution of an ESD right problem representation through cybernetics/self-organization are presented based on combined HD and ESD concepts. Then operational procedures for defining and validating a right problem for an individual or group and associated right decision/negotiation outcome are considered. Thus, the work contributes to procedural rationality - how decisions should be or are made - in purposeful complex adaptive systems. The paper suggests that for humans to live fully (awake) is to live in our love-based spirituality, in the moment, consciousness experiencing oneness/love at the edge of chaos, challenged in our purpose to live Two as One by spiritual or right decision/negotiation through cybernetics/self-organization, i.e., problem solving under oneness. Artificial agents in PCAS may participate in right decision/negotiation. They may in principle have consciousness but the nature of the subjective experience is unclear.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Birch, J. 1993, Loving Change, StressPress, Putney, Vermont.
Brown, S. L., and K. M. Eisenhardt. 1998, Managing on the Edge; Strategy as Structured Chaos, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
Bui, T., and M. F. Shakun. 1996, “Negotiation Processes, Evolutionary Systems Design and NEGOTIATOR,” Group Decision and Negotiation, 5(4–6).
Chalmers, D. J. 1995, “The Puzzle of Conscious Experience”, Scientific American, 273(6), December.
Chodron, P. 1997, When Things Fall Apart, Shambhala Publications, Boston.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. 1990, Flow: The Psychology of Experience, Harper Perennial, New York.
De Quincey, C. 1997, “Consciousness: The Final Frontier,” Noetic Sciences Review, No. 42, Jummen.
Faure, G.O., V. Le Dong, and M. F. Shakun. 1990, “Social-Emotional Aspects of Negotiation,” European Journal of Operational Research, 46(2), 177–180.
Fisher, R., W. Ury, and B. Patton, 1991, Getting to Yes, Penguin Books, New York.
Hameroff, S.R., A. W. Kaszniak, and A. C. Scott, (eds.), 1996, Toward a Science of Consciousness: The First Tucson Discussions and Debates, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Jampolsky, G. G. 1979, Love is Letting Go of Fear, Celestial Arts, Millbrae, California.
Kersten, G. E. et al. 1988, “Representing the Negotiation Problem with a Rule-Based Formalism”, Theory and Decision, 25(3), 225–257.
Kersten, G. E. et al. 1991, “Restructurable Representations of Negotiation,” Management Science, 37(October), 1269–1290.
Lewis, L. F. and M. F. Shakun, 1996, “Using MeetingWorks for Windows Group Support System to Implement Evolutionary Systems Design”, Group Decision and Negotiation, 5(4–6).
Picard R. W. 1997, Affective Computing, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Pransky, G. S. 1995, Living in Mental Well Being, Parts One and Two, Audiotapes, Pransky and Associates, LaConner, Washington.
Shakun, M. F. 1988, Evolutionary Systems Design: Policy Making Under Complexity and Group Decision Support Systems, Holden-Day, Oakland, CA.
Shakun, M. F. 1990, “Group Decision and Negotiation Support in Evolving, Nonshared Information Contexts,” Theory and Decision, 28(3), 275–288.
Shakun, M. F. 1991, “Airline Buyout: Evolutionary Systems Design and Problem Restructuring in Group Decision and Negotiation,” Management Science, 37(10), 1291–1303.
Shakun, M. F. 1992, “Defining a Right Problem in Group Decision and Negotiation: Feeling and Evolutionary Generating Procedures,” Group Decision and Negotiation, 1(1), 27–40.
Shakun, M. F. 1995, “Restructuring a Negotiation with Evolutionary Systems Design”, Negotiation Journal, 11(2), 145–150.
Shakun, M. F. 1996a, “Modeling and Supporting Task-Oriented Group Processes: Purposeful Complex Adaptive Systems and Evolutionary Systems Design,” Group Decision and Negotiation, 5(4–6), 305–317.
Shakun, M. F. 1996b, “Intercultural Group Decision and Negotiation with ESD and Computer Support”, Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Beijing, October 14–17, 1996.
Shakun, M. F. 1998, “An ESD Computer Culture for Intercultural Problem Solving and Negotiation,” Stern School of Business, New York University, New York, NY. To appear in Group Decision and Negotiation, Vol. 8, 1999.
Stacey, R. D. 1996, Complexity and Creativity in Organizations, Berrett-Koehler Publishers, San Francisco.
Sycara, K. P. 1990, “Negotiation Planning: An AI Approach,” European Journal of Operational Research, 46(2), 216–234.
Sycara, K. P. 1991, “Problem Restructuring in Negotiation,” Management Science, 37(October), 1248–1268.
Weik, K. E., and D. K. Meader 1993, “Sensemaking and Group Support Systems”, in Jessup, L. M. and J. S. Valacich (eds.), Group Support Systems: New Perspectives, Macmillan Publishing Company, New York.
Yu, P. L. 1995, Habitual Domains, Highwater Editions, Shawnee Missions, Kansas.
Zohar, D. and I. Marshall 1994. The Quantum Society, William Morrow, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shakun, M.F. Consciousness, Spirituality and Right Decision/Negotiation in Purposeful Complex Adaptive Systems. Group Decision and Negotiation 8, 1–15 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008620409745
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008620409745