Abstract
We study a general equilibrium system where agents have heterogeneous beliefs concerning realizations of possible outcomes. The actual outcomes feed back into beliefs thus creating a complicated nonlinear system. Beliefs are updated via a genetic algorithm learning process which we interpret as representing communication among agents in the economy. We are able to illustrate a simple principle: genetic algorithms can be implemented so that they represent pure learning effects (i.e., beliefs updating based on realizations of endogenous variables in an environment with heterogeneous beliefs). Agents optimally solve their maximization problem at each date given their beliefs at each date. We report the results of a set of computational experiments in which we find that our population of artificial adaptive agents is usually able to coordinate their beliefs so as to achieve the Pareto superior rational expectations equilibrium of the model.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Arifovic, Jasmina (1994). Genetic algorithm learning and the cobweb model. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 18, 3-28.
Arifovic, Jasmina (1995). Genetic algorithms and inflationary economies. Journal of Monetary Economics, 36, 219-243.
Arifovic, Jasmina (1996). The behavior of the exchange rate in the genetic algorithm and experimental economies. Journal of Political Economy, 104, 510-541.
Arifovic, Jasmina, Bullard, James and Duffy, John (1997). The transition from stagnation to growth: an adaptive learning approach. Journal of Economic Growth, 2, 185-209.
Arifovic, Jasmina and Eaton, Curtis (1995). Coordination via genetic learning. Computational Economics, 8, 181-203.
Bullard, James (1994). Learning equilibria. Journal of Economic Theory, 64, 468-485.
Bullard, James and Duffy, John (1998a). A model of learning and emulation with artificial adaptive agents, forthcoming. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control.
Bullard, James and Duffy, John (1998b). On learning and the stability of cycles, forthcoming. Macroeconomic Dynamics.
Grefenstette, John J. (1986). Optimization of control parameters for genetic algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 16, 122-128.
Goldberg, David E. (1989). Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning. Addison-Wesley, Menlo-Park, CA.
Lucas, Robert E. Jr. (1986). Adaptive behavior and economic theory. Journal of Business, 59, S401-S426.
Marcet, Albert and Sargent, Thomas J. (1989). Least squares learning and the dynamics of hyperinflation. In W.A. Barnett, J. Geweke and K. Shell (eds.), Economic Complexity: Chaos, Sunspots, Bubbles and Nonlinearity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Marimon, Ramon and Sunder, Shyam (1994). Expectations and learning under alternative monetary regimes: an experimental approach. Economic Theory, 4, 131-162.
Mitchell, Melanie (1996). An Introduction to Genetic Algorithms. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Pingle, Mark and Tesfatsion, Leigh (1994). Walras' law, pareto efficiency and intermediation in overlapping generations economies. Economic Report No. 34, Iowa State University.
Routledge, Bryan R. (1995). Adaptive learning in financial markets. Working paper. Carnegie Mellon University.
Rudolph, Günter (1994). Convergence analysis of canonical genetic algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 5, 96-101.
Sargent, Thomas J. (1993). Bounded Rationality in Macroeconomics. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Wilson, Charles A. (1981). Equilibrium in dynamic models with an infinity of agents. Journal of Economic Theory, 24, 95-111.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bullard, J., Duffy, J. Using Genetic Algorithms to Model the Evolution of Heterogeneous Beliefs. Computational Economics 13, 41–60 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008610307810
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008610307810