Skip to main content
Log in

Determination of Data Dimensionality in Hyperspectral Imagery—PNAPCA

  • Published:
Multidimensional Systems and Signal Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Minimum noise fraction (MNF) transformation or noise-adjusted principal component analysis (NAPCA) is frequently used to determine the inherent dimensionality for remote sensing images. However, these approaches are limited primarily in that the noise must be accurately estimated from the data or a priori. Inaccurately estimating the noise seriously degrades the validity of the calculated dimensionality. In this work, we apply NAPCA to a partitioned data space to resolve the inaccuracy of the noise estimation and properly estimate the data dimensionality. This approach is referred to herein as PNAPCA. In contrast to the PCA-based approaches which consider interrelationships within a set of variables, PNAPCA focuses on the relationship between two distinct subspaces which are partitioned from the data space of the original image by a simultaneous transformation. This partitioning causes the gap between the group of eigenvalues for signal plus noise and noise only to become larger than all other PCA-based approaches. The number of endmembers can then be determined by a designed union-intersection margin testing (UIMT). In addition, the performance of PNAPCA is assessed by two experiments using simulated and real imaging spectrometer data sets collected by the Airborne Visible Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS). Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method can effectively determine the intrinsic dimensionality of remote sensing images.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. T.W. Anderson, An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis, New York: JohnWiley and sons, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Wax and T. Kailaith, “Detection of Signals by Information Theoretic Criteria,” IEEE Trans. Acoustics, Speech, Signal Processing, vol. 33, no. 2, April 1985, pp. 387–392.

    Google Scholar 

  3. H. Akaike, “A New Look at the Statistical Model Identification,” IEEE Trans. Automatic Control, vol. 19, no. 6, 1974, pp. 716–723.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Rissanen, “Modelling by Shortest Data Description,” Automatica, vol. 14, 1978, pp. 465–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. A. A. Green, M. Berman, P. Switzer and M. Craig, “A Transformation for Ordering Multispectral Data in Terms of Image Quality with Implications for Noise Removal,” IEEE Trans. Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 26, no. 1, Jan. 1988, pp. 65–74.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. B. Lee, A. S. Woodyatt and M. Berman, “Enhancement of High Spectral Resolution Remote Sensing Data by a Noise-Adjusted Principal Components Transform,” IEEE Trans. on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 28, May 1990, pp. 295–304.

  7. R. E. Roger, “A Fast Way to Compute the Noise-Adjusted Principal Components Transform Matrix,” IEEE Trans. on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 32, 1990, pp. 1194–1196.

    Google Scholar 

  8. T. M. Tu, H. C. Shyu and C. H. Lee, “A Visual Disk Approach for Determining Data Dimensionality in Hyperspectral Imagery,” submitted to IEEE Trans. on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

  9. H. T. Wu, J. F. Yang and F. K. Chen, “Source Number Estimation Using Transformed Gerschgorin Radii,” IEEE Trans. on Signal Processing, vol. 43, June 1995, pp. 1325–1333.

  10. B. Adams, and M. O. Smith, “Spectral Mixture Modeling: A New Analysis of Rock and Soil Types at the Viking Lander 1 Site,” J. Geophys. Res., vol. 91, July 1986, pp. 8098–8112.

  11. K. Fukanaga, Introduction to Statistical Pattern Recognition, 2nd Edition, New York: Academic Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  12. ENVI User's Guide, version 2.6, Research Systems Inc., Jan. 1997.

  13. G. A. Swayze, R. N. Clark, S. Sutley, and A. Gallagher, “Ground-Truthing AVIRIS Mineral Mapping at Cuprite, Nevada,” Summaries of the Third Annual JPL Airborne Geosciences Workshop, Volume 1: AVIRIS Workshop, JPL Publication 92-14, 1992.

  14. W. H. Farrand, “Analysis of Altered Volcanic Pyroclasts using AVIRIS data,” Proceedings of the Third AVIRIS workshop, JPL Publication 91-28, 1991.

  15. C. Harsanyi and C-I Chang, “Hyperspectral Image Classification and Dimensionality Reduction: An Orthogonal Subspace Projection Approach,” IEEE Trans. Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 32, no. 4, July 1994, pp. 779–785.

    Google Scholar 

  16. T. M. Tu, C. H. Chen and C-I Chang, “A Noise Subspace Projection Approach to Target Signature Detection and Extraction in Unknown Background for Hyperspectral Images,” IEEE Trans. on Geosci. and Remote Sensing, Vol. 36, No. 1, 1998, pp. 171–1181.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tu, TM., Shyu, HC., Sun, YS. et al. Determination of Data Dimensionality in Hyperspectral Imagery—PNAPCA. Multidimensional Systems and Signal Processing 10, 255–273 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008416924341

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008416924341

Navigation