Skip to main content
Log in

Endogenous Transport Coefficients: Implications for Improving Water Quality from Multi-Contaminants in an Agricultural Watershed

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effectiveness of imperfect pollution control instruments is examined for a diffuse source, multi-contaminant problem in which the transport coefficients for sediment-bound residuals are endogenous. Similar evaluations fix the percentage of sediment deposited and optimize either for a single firm managing the whole watershed or on a firm by firm basis. This study shows that ignoring the dependence of the transport coefficients on intervening land uses creates a positive externality. The filtering potential of activities conducted by firms close to the receptor permits firms further away to undertake more profitable but erosive practices. Optimizing management choices, and consequently endogenizing the transport coefficients, for all firms simultaneously removes the externality. An empirical application combines hydrological simulation models with an economic optimization model for nutrient pollution of surface and ground water within an agricultural watershed. Although firms are homogeneous in abatement costs, differences in spatial location leave uniform instruments unable to achieve the water quality goal efficiently. An ambient tax/subsidy scheme can achieve the water quality goal efficiently but the informational requirements will be excessive in most situations where the transport mechanisms for residuals are dependent upon the practices of independent decision making units.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agriculture Canada (1990), Soil Survey of the Pilot Watersheds Southwestern Ontario Soil and Water Environmental Enhancement Program. Guelph: Ecological Services for Planning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, E. G., P. G. Newdick and R. W. Sheard (1987), Nitrogen Requirements for Corn in Southwestern Ontario. Guelph: University of Guelph.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedient, P. B. and W. C. Huber (1992), Hydrology and Floodplain Analysis, 2nd edn. Don Mills, ON: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouzaher, A., J. B. Braden and G. V. Johnson (1990), ‘A Dynamic Programming Approach to a Class of Nonpoint Source Pollution Problems’, Management Science (January) 36, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braden, J. B., G. V. Johnson, A. Bouzaher and D. Miltz (1989), ‘Optimal Spatial Management of Agricultural Pollution’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics (May) 71, 404–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braden, J. B., R. S. Larson and E. E. Herricks (1991), ‘Impact Targets versus Discharge Standards in Agricultural Pollution Management’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics (May) 73: 388–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, T. and A. W. Bos (1990), The Benefits of Good Water Quality. ENVIR AGFACTS, No. 02–1990. London, Ontario: Upper Thames River Conservation Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooke, A., D. Kendrick and A. Meeruus (1992), GAMS: A User's Guide, Release 2.25. Redwood City, CA: The Scientific Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deloitte and Touche Management Consultants (1992a), An Economic Evaluation of Soil Tillage Techniques: Volume II, Collection and Analysis of Filed Date in the Pilot Watershed Study. Guelph: Soil and Water Environmental Enhancement Program.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deloitte and Touche Management Consultants (1992b), An Economic Evaluation of Soil Tillage Techniques: Volume III, Field Level Economic Analysis of Changing Tillage Practices in Southwestern Ontario. Guelph: Soil and Water Environmental Enhancement Program.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deloitte and Touche Management Consultants (1992c), An Economic Evaluation of Soil Tillage Techniques: Volume IV, Watershed Level Economic Analysis of Tillage Practices in Southwestern Ontario. Guelph: Soil and Water Environmental Enhancement Program.

    Google Scholar 

  • Energy Mines and Resources (1986), Essex County, 1:50,000 map.

  • Environment Canada (1987), The Great Lakes: An Environmental Atlas and Resource Book. Ottawa: Government of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estrin, D. and J. Swaigen (1993), Environment on Trial: A Guide to Ontario Environmental Law and Policy, 3rd edn. Toronto: Emond Montgomery Publications Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Santos, J., S. Zekri and A. C. Herruzo (1993), ‘On-Farm Costs of Reducing Nitrogen Pollution through BMP’, Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment (May) 45, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, B. O. and N. D. Olewiler (1995), Environmental Economics. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frere, M. H., J. D. Ross and L. J. Lane (1980), Chapter 4: The Nutrient Submodel. CREAMS. A Field Scale Model for Chemicals, Runoff, and Erosion From Agricultural Management Systems. United States Department of Agriculture, Conservation Research Report No. 26.

  • Fuller, B. and R. Flemming (1990), Managing Liquid Manure Runoff from Manure Stacks and Feedlots. ENVIR AGFACTS, No. 09–1990. London, Ontario: Upper Thames River Conservation Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Great Lakes Water Quality Board (1989), 1989 Report on Great Lakes Water Quality. Windsor, Ontario: International Joint Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanley, N. (1990), ‘The Economics of Nitrate Pollution’, European Review of Agricultural Economics 17, 129–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayman, D. G. (1989), A Clean Up Rural Beaches Plan (CURB) for Fanshawe, Pittock and Wildwood Reservoirs. London, Ontario: Upper Thames River Conservation Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazell, P. B. and R. D. Norton (1986), Mathematical Programming for Economic Analysis in Agriculture. New York: MacMillan Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Health and Welfare Canada (1980), Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality — 1978 — Supporting Documentation. Ottawa: Government of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, W. D. and D. A. Carr (1985), Rainfall Frequency Atlas for Canada. Ottawa, ON: Government of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helfand, G. E. and B. W. House (1995), ‘Regulating Nonpoint Source Pollution Under Heterogeneous Conditions’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics (November) 77, 1024–1032.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Joint Commission, Council of Great Lakes Research Mangers (1991), A Proposed Framework for Developing Indicators of Ecosystem Health for the Great Lakes Region.

  • International Joint Commission, International Reference Group on Great Lakes Pollution from Land Use Activities (1978), Contribution of Phosphorus to the Great Lakes From Agricultural Land in the Canadian Great Lakes Basin. Windsor: International Joint Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. L., R.M. Adams and G.M. Perry (1991), ‘The On Farm Costs of Reducing Groundwater Pollution’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics (November) 73, 1063–1073.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joy, D. (1994), Department of Engineering, University of Guelph. Personal communication, May.

  • Kramer, R. A., W. T. McSweeny, W. R. Kerns and R. W. Stavros (1984), ‘An Evaluation of Alternative Policies for Controlling Agricultural Nonpoint Source Pollution’, Water Resources Bulletin (December) 20, 841–846.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mengel, K. and E. A. Kirkby (1987), Principles of Plant Nutrition. Switzerland: International Potash Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, M. (1988), ‘Impact of Agricultural Practices on Subsurface Water Quality’, in J. A. Stone and L. L. Logan, eds., Agriculture Chemicals and Water Quality in Ontario, Proceedings of a workshop sponsored by the Ontario Water Management Resources and Services Committee. Kitchener, Ontario, November 17–18, pp. 78–83.

  • Moxey, A. and B. White (1994), ‘Efficient Compliance with Agricultural Nitrate Pollution Standards’, Journal of Agricultural Economics (January) 45, 27–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Engineering Handbook (1972), Section 4, Hydrology. Ottawa: Government of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food (1988), 1988 Crop Budgets. Publication 60. Toronto: OMAF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food (1992), Agricultural Statistics for Ontario 1991. Publication 20. Toronto: OMAF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (1986), Water Pollution by Fertilizers and Pesticides. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan, J. H. and I. Hodge (1994), ‘Land Use Permits as an Alternative to Fertiliser and Leaching Taxes for the Control on Nitrate Pollution’, Journal of Agricultural Economics (January) 45, 102–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, P. H., F. Bertrand and J. W. Maclaren (1985), Currents of Change — Final Report — Inquiry on Federal Water Policy. Ottawa: Inquiry on Federal Water Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • PLUARG (1978), See International Joint Commission, International Reference Group on Great Lakes Pollution from Land Use Activities.

  • Segerson, K. (1988), ‘Uncertainty and Incentives for Nonpoint Pollution Control’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 15, 87–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shortle, J. S. (1990), ‘The Allocative Efficiency Implications of Water Pollution Abatement Cost Comparisons’, Water Resources Research, 26, 793–797.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Canada. Agricultural Division (1992a), Agricultural Profile of Ontario: Part 1. Catalogue 95–356. Ottawa: Government of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Canada. Agricultural Division (1992b), Census Overviews of Canadian Agriculture: 1971–1991. Catalogue 93–348. Ottawa: Government of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stonehouse, D. P. and M. Bohl (1990), ‘Land Degradation Issues in Canadian Agriculture’, Canadian Public Policy — Analyse de Politiques XVI(4), 418–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teague, M. L., D. J. Bernardo and H. P. Mapp (1995), ‘Farm-Level Economic Analysis Incorporating Stochastic Environmental Risk Assessment’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics (February) 77, 8–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tietenberg, T. H. (1992), Environmental and Natural Resource Economics, 3rd edn. New York: HarperCollins Publishers Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wischmeier, W. H. and D. D. Smith (1978), Predicting Rainfall Erosion Losses — A Guide to Conservation Planning. Washington, DC: USDA, Agriculture Handbook No. 537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, R. A, C. A. Onstad, D. D. Bosch and W. P. Anderson (1987), AGNPS, Agricultural Non-Point-Source Pollution Model: A Watershed Analysis Tool. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Conservation Research Report 35.

  • Young, R. A, C. A. Onstad, D. D. Bosch and W. P. Anderson (1994), AGNPS, Agricultural Non-Point-Source Pollution Model, Version 4.03, AGNPS User's Guide. U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lintner, A.M., Weersink, A. Endogenous Transport Coefficients: Implications for Improving Water Quality from Multi-Contaminants in an Agricultural Watershed. Environmental and Resource Economics 14, 269–296 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008395209939

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008395209939

Navigation