Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Douglas Walton, Appeal to Expert Opinion– Arguments from Authority.

  • Published:
Artificial Intelligence and Law Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Berman, D.H. & Hafner, C.D. 1995. Understanding precedents in a temporal context of evolving legal doctrine, in Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ACM Press, New York, pp. 12–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, T.F. 1993. The Pleadings Game: An Artificial Intelligence Model of Procedural Justice, Ph.D. Diss., Technische Hochschule Darmstadt.

  • Gordon, T.F. 1995. The Pleadings Game: An Artificial Intelligence Model of Procedural Justice, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hage, Jaap C., Leenes, Ronald & Lodder, Arno R. 1994. Hard cases: a procedural approach, Artificial Intelligence and Law 2, 113–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leenes, R.E. 1998. Hercules of Karneades, Hard Cases in recht en rechtsinformatica. (Hercules or Karneades; Hard Cases in Law in and AI and Law), PhD thesis University of Twente (in Dutch), Twente University Press, Enschede.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodder, A.R. 1998. DiaLaw: On Legal Justification and Dialogical Models of Argumentation, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarty, L.T. 1995. An implementation of Eisner v. Macomber, in Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ACM Press, New York, pp. 276–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prakken, Henry 1999. On formalising burden of proof in legal argument, in H. Jaap van den Henrik et al. (eds.), Legal Knowledge Based Systems, Jurix 1999, The Twelfth Conference, GNI, Nijmegen, pp. 85–97.

  • Prakken, H. & Sartor, G. 1998. Modelling reasoning with precedents in a formal dialogue game, Artificial Intelligence and Law 6, 231–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rissland, E.L. & Ashley, K.D. 1987. A case-based system for trade secrets law, in Proceedings of the First International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ACM Press, New York, pp. 60–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, D.N. & Krabbe, E.C.W. 1995. Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning, State University of New York Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, Douglas N. 1999. Appeal to Popular Opinion, Penn State Press. Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Public Administration and Public Policy, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands

    Ronald Leenes

Authors
  1. Ronald Leenes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leenes, R. Douglas Walton, Appeal to Expert Opinion– Arguments from Authority.. Artificial Intelligence and Law 8, 277–281 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008394704101

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008394704101

Keywords

Search

Navigation