Skip to main content
Log in

A Guide to Extracting Information from Environmental Pressure Groups

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the relationship between environmental pressure groupsand environmental policy makers. Environmental pressure groups are assumedto possess valuable private information on environmental issues.Environmental pressure groups are also assumed to pursue their ownpreferences, which are only partially correlated with policy makers'preferences. A new aspect is that binding contracts with side payments arenot allowed, which accurately describes the interaction betweenenvironmental pressure groups and governments. It is shown that by choosingprobabilities of acting on environmental pressure groups' signals, adecision maker can force environmental pressure groups to reveal superiorinformation even in the absence of binding contracts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Becker G. (1983), ‘A Theory of Competition among Pressure Groups for Political Influence’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 98, 371-400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, P. S. (1994), ‘Land Use Externalities: Mechanism Design for the Allocation of Environmental Resources’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 30(2), 174-185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cropper, M. L., W. N. Evans, S. J. Berardi, M. M. Ducla-Soares and P. R. Portney (1992), ‘Determinants of Pesticide Regulation: A Statistical Analysis of EPA Decision Making’, Journal of Political Economy 100, 175-197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewatripont, M. and J. Tirole (1999), ‘Advocates’, Journal of Political Economy 107(1), 1-39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. S., F. Oberholzer-Gee and R. Eichenberger (1996), ‘Markets and Morals’, Journal of Political Economy 104(6), 1297-1313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg, D. and J. Tirole (1991), Game Theory. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, J. and J-J. Laffont (1978), ‘An Incentive Compatible Planning Procedure for Public Good Production’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics.

  • Groves, T. and J. Ledyard (1977), ‘Optimal Allocation of Public Goods, The Solution to the “Free-Rider” Problem’, Econometrica 45, 783-809.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groves, T. and J. Ledyard (1980), ‘The Existence of Efficient and Incentive Compatible Equilibria with Public Goods’, Econometrica 48, 1487-1506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartle, D. G. (1983), ‘The Theory of “Rent-Seeking”: Some Reflections’, Canadian Journal of Economics 16, 539-554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurley, Terrence M. and J. Shogren (1997), ‘Environmental Conflicts and the SLAPP’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 33, 253-273.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nævdal, E., Brazee, R.J. A Guide to Extracting Information from Environmental Pressure Groups. Environmental and Resource Economics 16, 105–119 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008389431896

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008389431896

Navigation