Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Multi-Body Analysis of a Tiltrotor Configuration

  • Published:
Nonlinear Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper describes the aeroelastic analysis of a tiltrotor configuration. The 1/5 scale wind tunnel semispan model of the V-22 tiltrotor aircraft is considered. The analysis is performed by means of a multi-body code, based on an original formulation. The differential equilibrium problem is stated in terms of first-order differential equations. The equilibrium equations of every rigid body are written together with the definitions of the momenta. The bodies are connected by kinematic constraints applied in the form of Lagrangian multipliers. Deformable components are mainly modelled by means of beam elements based on an original finite volume formulation. Multi-disciplinary problems can be solved by adding user-defined differential equations. In the presented analysis, the equations related to the control of the swash-plate of the model are considered. Advantages of a multi-body aeroelastic code over existing comprehensive rotorcraft codes include the exact modelling of the kinematics of the hub, the detailed modelling of the flexibility of critical hub components, and the possibility to simulate steady flight conditions as well as wind-up and maneuvers. The simulations described in the paper include (1) the analysis of the aeroelastic stability, with particular regard to the proprotor/pylon instability that is peculiar to tiltrotors, (2) the determination of the dynamic behavior of the system and of the loads due to typical maneuvers, with particular regard to the conversion from helicopter to airplane mode, and (3) the stress evaluation in critical components, such as the pitch links and the conversion downstop spring.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bauchau, O. A. and Kang, N. K., 'A multibody formulation for helicopter structural dynamic analysis', Journal of the American Helicopter Society 38(2), 1986, 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brenan, K. E., Campbell, S. L., and Petzold, L. R., Numerical Solution of Initial-Value Problems in Differential-Algebraic Equations, North-Holland, New York, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cardona, A., 'An integrated approach to mechanism analysis', Thèse de doctorat, Université de Liège, 1989.

  4. Ghiringhelli, G. L. and Mantegazza, P., 'Linear, straight and untwisted anisotropic beam section properties from solid finite elements', Composites Engineering 4(12), 1994, 1225–1239.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ghiringhelli, G. L., Masarati, P., and Mantegazza, P., 'Multi-body aeroelastic analysis of smart rotor blades, actuated by means of piezo-electric devices', in CEAS International Forum on Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics, Rome, Italy, June 17–20, Vol. II, AIDAA (ed.), Esagrafica, Rome, 1997, pp. 115–122.

  6. Ghiringhelli, G. L., Masarati, P., and Mantegazza, P., 'A multi-body implementation of finite volume beams', AIAA Journal, accepted for publication.

  7. Giavotto, V., Borri, M., Mantegazza, P., Ghiringhelli, G. L., Caramaschi, V., Maffioli, G. C., and Mussi, F., 'Anisotropic beam theory and applications', Computer & Structures 16(1–4), 1983, 403–413.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Harris, F. D., Tarzanin, Jr., F. J., and Fisher, Jr., R. K., 'Rotor high speed performance, theory vs. test', Journal of the American Helicopter Society 15(3), 1970, 35–41.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Haug, E. J., Computer Aided Kinematics and Dynamics of Mechanical Systems. Vol. 1: Basic Methods, Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Johnson, W., Helicopter Theory, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Johnson, W., 'Development of a comprehensive analysis for rotorcraft – I. Rotor model and wake analysis', Vertica 5, 1981, 99–129.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Johnson, W., 'Development of a comprehensive analysis for rotorcraft – II. Aircraft model, solution procedure and applications', Vertica 5, 1981, 185–216.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Johnson, W., 'Technology drivers in the development of CAMRAD II', American Helicopter Society Aeromechanics Specialists Conference, San Francisco, CA, January 19–21, 1994.

  14. Hong, C. H. and Chopra, I., 'Aeroelastic stability analysis of a composite rotor blade', Journal of the American Helicopter Society 30(2), 1985, 57–67.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kwaternik, R. G., 'Studies in tilt-rotor VTOL aircraft aeroelasticity', Ph.D. Thesis, Case Western Reserve University, 1973.

  16. Kwaternik, R. G., 'A review of some tilt-rotor aeroelastic research at NASA-Langley', Journal of Aircraft 13(5), 1976, 357–363.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lanz, M., Mantegazza, P., and Faure Ragani, P., 'Aeroelastic rotor dynamics by general finite element and multibody approaches', in IX World Congress on the Theory of Machines and Mechanisms, Milano, Italy, 29 August–2 September 1995, Vol. 2, A. Rovetta (ed.), Unicopli, 1995, pp. 1650–1656.

  18. Masarati, P. and Mantegazza, P., 'On the C 0 discretisation of beams by finite elements and finite volumes', L'Aerotecnica Missili e Spazio 75, 1997, 77–86.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nixon, M. W., 'Aeroelastic response and stability of tiltrotors with elastically-coupled composite rotor blades', Ph.D. Thesis, University of Maryland, 1993.

  20. Nixon, M. W., Kwaternik, R. G., and Settle, T. B., 'Higher harmonic control tiltrotor vibration reduction', in CEAS International Forum on Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics, Rome, Italy, June 17–20, Vol. II, AIDAA (ed.), Esagrafica, Rome, 1997, pp. 327–334.

  21. Parham, Jr., T., 'A3B semispan model stress report', Bell Helicopter Internal Report No. 599-099-197, November, 1994.

  22. Pitt, M. and Peters, D. A., 'Theoretical prediction of dynamic-inflow derivatives', Vertica 5, 1981, 21–34.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Popelka, D., Sheffler, M., and Bilger, J., 'Correlation of test and analysis for the 1/5-scale V-22 aeroelastic model', Journal of the American Helicopter Society 32(2), 1987, 21–32.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Settle, T. B. and Kidd, D. L., 'Evolution and test history of the V-22 0.2-scale aeroelastic model', Journal of the American Helicopter Society 37(1), 1992, 31–45.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schiehlen, W., Multibody Systems Handbook, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dipartimento di Ingegneria Aerospaziale, Politecnico di Milano, via, La Masa 34, 20158, Milano, Italy

    G. L. Ghiringhelli, P. Masarati & P. Mantegazza

  2. NASA Langley Research Center, Bldg. 648, Hampton, VA, 23681, U.S.A

    M. W. Nixon

Authors
  1. G. L. Ghiringhelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. P. Masarati
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. P. Mantegazza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. W. Nixon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ghiringhelli, G.L., Masarati, P., Mantegazza, P. et al. Multi-Body Analysis of a Tiltrotor Configuration. Nonlinear Dynamics 19, 333–357 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008386219934

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008386219934

Search

Navigation