Skip to main content
Log in

The Informational Effect of Corporate Lobbying Against Proposed Accounting Standards

  • Published:
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Accounting standard setting has been described as a highly political process. Different interest groups are often quite ready to criticize any proposed accounting standard and lobby the accounting standard setting body. This study explores the possibility that certain information might be revealed through corporate lobbying behavior. A game-theoretic model is formulated to examine the implications of a proposed accounting standard which, if passed, would require the financial statement recording of some previously undisclosed liabilities. In this model, management has incentive to lobby against the standard and prevent the mandatory reporting of the liabilities. Lobbying against the standard, however, may itself reveal to the market information about the liabilities. Results of the equilibrium analysis show that, because of this informational effect, a company may choose not to lobby even though the company may have a high liability and can be adversely affected by the proposed standard. On the other hand, a company may avoid revealing its liability level if it can adopt the "always-lobby" strategy. Furthermore, a company may not have to lobby at all if it can "free-ride" on other companies' lobbying effort. Companies may even be able to enjoy "free-riding" at least some of the time if each company can share the responsibilities and lobby on a probabilistic and what otherwise may seem like a random basis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ainsworth, S., ”Regulating Lobbyists and Interest Group Influence.” The Journal of Politics 55(1), 41–56, (February 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Amershi, A.H., J.S. Demski, and M.A. Wolfson, “Strategic Behavior and Regulation Research in Accounting.” Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 1, 19–32, (Fall 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Atiase, R.K., ”Predisclosure Information, Firm Capitalization, and Security Price Behavior Around Earnings Announcements.” Journal of Accounting Research 23, 21–36, (Spring 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Austen-Smith, D., ”Information and Influence: Lobbying for Agendas and Votes.” American Journal of Political Science 37(3), 799–833, (August 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Austen-Smith, D., and J.R. Wright, “Competitive Lobbying for a Legislator's Vote.” Social Choice and Welfare 9, 229–257, (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks, J.S., and B.R.Weingast, “The Political Control of Bureaucracies under Asymmetric Information.” American Journal of Political Science 36(2), 509–524, (May 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Banz, R.W., ”The Relationship Between Return and Market Value of Common Stock.” Journal of Financial Economics 9, 3–18, (March 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beresford, D.R., ”How should the FASB be judged?” Accounting Horizons 9, 56–61, (June 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, P., and N. Cocks, “Critical Research Issues in Accounting Standard Setting.” Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 17, 511–528, (Autumn 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P.R., ”A Descriptive Analysis of Select Input Bases of the Financial Accounting Standards Board.” Journal of Accounting Research 19, 232–246, (Spring 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckmaster D., E. Saniga, and S. Tadesse, “Measuring Lobbying Influence Using the Financial Accounting Standards Board Public Record.” Journal of Economic and Social Measurement 20, 331–356, (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deakin, E.B., ”Rational Economic Behavior and Lobbying on Accounting Issues: Evidence from the Oil and Gas Industry.” The Accounting Review 64, 137–151, (January 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhaliwal, D.S., ”Some Economic Determinants of Management Lobbying for Alternative Methods of Accounting: Evidence from the Accounting for Interest Costs Issue.” Journal of Business Finance & Accountin 9, 255–265, (Summer 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A., An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espahbodi, H., E. Strock, and H. Tehranianq, “Impact on Equity Prices of Pronouncements Related to Nonpension Postretirement Benefits.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 14, 323–346, (December 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fields, T.D., and R.R. King, “Voting Rules for the FASB.” Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance 11(1), 99–117, (Winter 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No.1, Objectives of Financial Reporting by Business Enterprises. Stamford, Connecticut: Financial Accounting Standards Board, (November 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), Preliminary Views on Employers' Accounting for Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits. Stamford, Connecticut: Financial Accounting Standards Board, (November 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), Discussion Memorandum on Employers' Accounting for Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits. Stamford, Connecticut: Financial Accounting Standards Board, (April 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), Public Record: Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 81, Disclosure of Postretirement Health Care and Life Insurance Benefits. Stamford, Connecticut: Financial Accounting Standards Board, (July 1985).

  • Francis, J.R., ”Lobbying Against Proposed Accounting Standards: The Case of Employers' Pension Accounting.” Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 6, 35–57, (Spring 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Galant, D., ”Mountain or Molehill?” Institutional Investor 23, 69–72, (July 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerboth, D.L., ”Research, Intuition, and Politics in Accounting Inquiry.” The Accounting Review 48, 475–482, (July 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerboth, D.L., ”Accruing the Cost of Other Postemployment Benefits—The Measurement Problem.” CPA Journal 58, 36–44, (November 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorton, D.E., ”The SEC Decision Not to Support SFAS 19: A Case Study of the Effect of Lobbying on Standard Setting.” Accounting Horizons, 29–41, (March 1991).

  • Hakansson, N.H.,“On the Policies of Accounting Disclosure and Measurement: An Analysis of Economic Incentives.” Journal of Accounting Research 19, 1–35, (Supplment 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Haring, J.R., Jr., ”Accounting Rules and The Accounting Establishment”. Journal of Business 52, 507–519, (October 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J.C., ”Games with Incomplete Information Played by 'Bayesian' Players—Part I.” Management Science 14, 159–182, (November 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J.C., ”Games with Incomplete Information Played by 'Bayesian' Players—Part II.” Management Science 14, 320–334, (January 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hope, T., and J. Briggs, “Accounting Policy Making Some Lessons from the Deferred Taxation Debate.” Accounting and Business Research, 83–96, (Spring 1982).

  • Hope, T., and R. Gray, “Power and Policy Making: The Development of An R & D Standard.” Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 9, 531–557, (Winter 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Horngren, C.T., ”The Marketing of Accounting Standards.” Journal of Accountancy, 61–66, (October 1973).

  • Kelly, L., ”Corporate Lobbying and Changes in Financing or Operating Activities in Reaction to FAS No. 8.” Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 1, 153–173, (Winter 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, L., ”Corporate Management Lobbying on FAS No. 8: Some Further Evidence.” Journal of Accounting Research 23, 619–632, (Autumn 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • King, R.D., and T.B. O'Keefe, “Lobbying Activities and Insider Trading.” The Accounting Review 61, 76–90, (January 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, E.A., A.G. Puxty, and R.C. Laughlin, “Simple Theories for Complex Processes: Accounting Policy and the Market for Myopia.” Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 2, 19–42, (Spring 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier, H.H., P. Alam, and M.A. Pearson, “Auditor Lobbying for Accounting Standards: The Case of Banks and Savings and Loan Associations.” Accounting and Business Research 23, 477–487, (Autumn 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • McKee, A.J., Jr., T.B. Bell, and J.R. Boatsman, “Management Preferences Over Accounting Standards: A Replication and Additional Tests.” The Accounting Review 59, 647–659, (October 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, D.P., ”The SEC's Influence on Accounting Standards: The Power of the Veto.” Journal of Accounting Research 19(Supplement), 134–156, (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Noreen, E., and J. Sepe, “Market Reactions to Accounting Policy Deliberations: The Inflation Accounting Case.” The Accounting Review 56, 253–269, (April 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ndubizu, G., Y.C. Choi, and R. Jain, “Corporate Lobbying Strategy and Pension Accounting Deliberations: An Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance 8, 277–287, (Summer 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Keefe, T.B., and S.Y. Soloman, “Do Managers Believe the Efficient Market Hypothesis? Additional Evidence.” Accounting & Business Research, 67–79, (Spring 1985).

  • Potters, J., and F. Van Winden, “Lobbying and Asymmetric Information.” Public Choice 74, 269–292, (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Puro, M., ”Do Large Accounting Firms Collude in the Standards-Setting Process?” Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance 8, 165–177, (Spring 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ro, B., ”Firm Size and the Information Content of Annual Earnings Announcements.” Contemporary Accounting Research 4, 438–449, (Spring 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schipper, K., and R. Thompson, “The Impact of Merger-Related Regulations on Shareholders of Acquiring Firms.” Journal of Accounting Research 21, 184–221, (Spring 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W.R., Financial Accounting Theory. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc., (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharav, I., ”Political Accounting.” Barron's, 50, (20 March 1995).

  • Sims, M.A., and K.L. Cullis, “Using a Proportional Odds Model to analyse the Factors that influence Accounting Standard Setting Lobbying in Australia.” Accounting & Finance 35, 175–195, (November 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A.J., ”The SEC “Reversal” of FASB Statement No. 19: An Investigation of Information Effects.” Journal of Accounting Research 19, 174–211, (Supplement 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunder, S., ”Political Economy of Accounting Standards.” Journal of Accounting Literature 7, 31–41, (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, T.G., ”Lobbying of Accounting Standard-Setting Bodies in the U.K. and the U.S.A.: A Downsian Analysis.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 9(1), 81–95, (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, T.G., ”The Proposed Introduction of Current Cost Accounting in the U.K.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 10, 127–149, (April 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Taplin, P.T., ”Untangling Web of Problems in Retiree Benefits.” Employee Benefit Plan Review 39, 32–34, (January 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, G., ”Inflation Accounting in A Theory of Calculation.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 12(5), 523–543, (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Verrecchia, R.E., ”Discretionary Disclosure.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 5(3), 179–194, (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, R.L., and J.L. Zimmerman, “Towards a Positive Theory of the Determination of Accounting Standards.” The Accounting Review 53, 112–134, (January 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, R.L., and J.L. Zimmerman, Positive Accounting Theory. New York: Prentice-Hall, (1986).

  • Ziebart, D.A., and D.H. Kim,. “An Examination of the Market Reactions Associated with SFAS No. 8 and SFAS No. 52.” The Accounting Review 62, 343–357, (April 1987). 35

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chung, D.Y. The Informational Effect of Corporate Lobbying Against Proposed Accounting Standards. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 12, 243–270 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008374831913

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008374831913

Navigation