Skip to main content
Log in

Signaling, Financial Slack and Corporate Acquisitions

  • Published:
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper shows that under certain conditions a firm's decision concerning the optimal medium of exchange to use in acquiring another firm is related to the decision of which source of capital should be used to finance long-term projects. An example of this type of interaction occurs when the firm's only source of financing a positive net present value project is an equity issue. In a Myers and Majluf (1984) world of asymmetric information the value maximizing strategy for the firm is to forego the public equity offering and instead use a stock offer to acquire a firm possessing financial slack. The process is modeled using an extension of the Myers and Majluf (1984) model and demonstrates how the acquisition alternative allows managers to separate the signals regarding the investment and financing decisions. Including net pension assets into our measure of financial slack, we provide empirical supports for the ability of the extended model to explain observed merger activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asquith, P., “Merger Bids, Market Uncertainty, and Stockholder Returns.” Journal of Financial Economics 11, 51-83, (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Asquith, P. and D. Mullins, “Equity Issues and Offering Dilution.” Journal of Financial Economics 15, 61-89, (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, F., “The Tax Advantage of Pension Fund Investments in Bonds.” Working Paper, NBER.

  • Bowers, H. and N. Moore, “Market Valuation of Excess Pension Assets.” Journal of Risk and Insurance 62, 214-229, (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, M., “Interfirm Tender Offers and the Market for Corporate Control.” Journal of Business 37, 345-376, (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. and J. Warner, “Using Daily Stock Returns: the Case of Event Studies.” Journal of Financial Economics 8, 3-31, (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, R., “The Use of Excess Cash and Debt Capacity as a Motive for Merger.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 23, 199-217, (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodd, P. and R. Ruback, “Tender Offers and Stockholder Returns: An Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Financial Economics 5, 351-373, (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, P., “Empirical Estimates of the Amount and Distribution of Gains to Companies in Mergers.” Journal of Business 46, 544-575, (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, E., “Why One Firm is the Target and the Other the Bidder in Single-Bidder, Synergistic Takeovers.” Journal of Business 67, 263-280, (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, R. and R. Kerchner, “Issue Costs and Common Stock Offerings.” Financial Management 25, 54-65, (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. and R. Ruback, “The Market for Corporate Control: the Scientific Evidence.” Journal of Financial Economics 11, 5-50, (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leland, H. and D. Pyle, “Information Asymmetries, Financial Structure, and Financial Intermediation.” Journal of Finance 32, 372-387, (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • Malatesta, P., “TheWealth Effect of Merger Activity and the Objective Functions of Merging Firms.” Journal of Financial Economics 11, 156-181, (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, R., “Investment-Banking Contracts in Tender Offers: An Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Financial Economics 28, 209-232, (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, N. and S. Pruitt, “Excess Asset Reversions and Shareholder Wealth: A Comment.” Journal of Finance (1989).

  • Myers, S. and N. Majluf, “Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions When Firms Have Information That Investors do not have.” Journal of Financial Economics 13, 187-221, (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenberg, E. and Ross, M., “To Purchase or to Pool, Does it Matter?” Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 12, 32-47, (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholes, M. and J. Williams, “Estimating Betas from Nonsynchronous Data.” Journal of Financial Economics 5, 309-327, (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. and J. Kim, “The Combined Effect of Free Cash Flow and Financial Slack on Bidder and Stock Returns.” Journal of Business 67, 281-310, (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, M., “A Financing Explanation for Overfunded Pension Plan Terminations.” Journal of Accounting Research 25, 317-326, (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thronton, T., “The Corporate Pension Fund as a Strategic Business Unit.” Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 6, 98-102, (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tepper, I., “Taxation and Corporate Pension Policy.” Journal of Finance 36, 1-14, (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Travlos, N., “Corporate Takeover Bids, Methods of Payment, and Bidding Firms' Stock Returns.” Journal of Finance 42, 943-963, (1987).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bowers, H.M., Moore, N.H. & Tse, K.M. Signaling, Financial Slack and Corporate Acquisitions. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 15, 195–216 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008373205675

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008373205675

Navigation