Skip to main content
Log in

Measurement Error and Nonlinearity in the Earnings-Returns Relation

  • Published:
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is a long history of research which examines the relation between unexpected earnings and unexpected returns on common stock. Early literature used simple linear regression models to describe this relation. Recently, a number of authors have proposed nonlinear models. These authors find that the earnings-returns relation is approximately linear for small changes but is 'S'-shaped globally. However, unexpected earnings are generated by the sum of a measurement error and a true earnings innovation, so the apparent nonlinearity could be an artifact of nonlinearity in the measurement errors. Using a research design that minimizes the presence of measurement errors, we provide evidence consistent with the hypothesis that measurement errors contribute to the nonlinearities in the earnings-returns relation. While we are not suggesting that the earnings-returns relation is linear, our evidence suggests that there is no advantage to using a nonlinear model for large firms that are widely followed by analysts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abarbanell, J.S., W.N. Lanen and R.E. Verrechia, “Analysts' forecasts as proxies for investor beliefs in empirical research.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 20, 31–60, (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Abdel-khalik, A.R. “Specification problems with information content of earnings: revisions and rationality of expectations and self-selection bias.” Contemporary Accounting Research 7, 142–172 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, R., S.P. Kothari and R.L. Watts, “Economic determinants of the relation between earnings changes and stock returns.” The Accounting Review 68, 622–638, (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beneish, M.D., “Stock prices and the dissemination of analysts' recommendations.” Journal of Business 64, 393–416, (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beneish, M.D. and C.R. Harvey, “A new approach to estimating the earnings response function.” Working paper, Duke University, (1990).

  • Bernard, V.L. and J.K. Thomas, “Post-announcement drift: Delayed price response or risk premium?” Journal of Accounting Research 27, 1–36, (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L.D., “Earnings Forecasting Research: Its Implications for Capital Markets Research.” Journal of International Forecasting 9, 295–320, (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L., P. Griffin, R. Hagerman, and M. Zmijewski, “Security analyst superiority relative to univariate time series models in forecasting quarterly earnings.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 9, 61–87, (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacoullos, T., “Estimation of a multivariate density.” Annals of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics 18, 176–189, (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, A.E. and Penman, S.H., “Timeliness of reporting and the stock price reaction to earnings announcements.” Journal of Accounting Research 22, 21–47, (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, C.S.A., W.S. Hopwood and J.C. McKeown, “Nonlinearity and specification problems in unexpected earnings response regression model.” The Accounting Review 67, 379–398, (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland, W.S. and S.J. Devlin, “Locally weighted regression: An approach to regression analysis by local fitting.” Journal of the American Statistical Assocation 83, 596–609, (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, D.W. and S.P. Kothari, “An analysis of intertemporal and cross-sectional determinants of earnings response coefficients.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 11, 143–181, (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornell, B., and Landsman, W.R., “Security price response to quarterly earnings announcements and analysts' forecast revisions.” The Accounting Review 64, 680–692, (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie, A.A., “On cross-sectional analysis in accounting research” Journal of Accounting and Economics 9, 231–258, (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, S. and B. Lev, “Nonlinearity in the returns-earnings relation: Tests of alternative specification and explanations.” Contemporary Accounting Review 11, 353–379, (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton, P. and M. Zmijewski, “Cross-sectional variation in the stock market response to accounting earnings announcements.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 11, 117–141, (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E.F. and K.R. French, “Business conditions and expected returns on stocks and bonds.” Journal of Financial Economics 25, 23–50, (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E.F. and K.R. French, “The cross section of expected returns.” Journal of Finance 42, 427–466, (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R.N. and S. Tse, “A nonlinear model of security price responses to unexpected earnings.” Journal of Accounting Research 30, 185–209, (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukunaga, K., Introduction to statistical pattern recognition, New York: Academic Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallant, A.R., “On the bias in flexible functional forms and an essentially unbiased form: The Fourier flexible form.” Journal of Econometrics 15, 211–224, (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Granger, C.W.J. and P. Newbold, Forecasting economic time series, New York: Academic Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, L.P., “Large sample properties of generalized method of moment estimators.” Econometrica 50, 1029–1054, (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Härdle, W., Applied Nonparametric Regression. Cambridge University Press, 1990.

  • Hughes, J.S. and Ricks, W.E., “Association between forecast errors and excess returns near to earnings announcements.” The Accounting Review 62, 158–175, (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Keim, D.B. and R.F. Stambaugh, “Predicting returns in the bond and stock market.” Journal of Financial Economics 17, 357–390, (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, M., “Time-varying stock price responses to earnings induced by uncertainty about the time-series properties of earnings.” Journal of Accounting Research 27, 229–257, (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lev, B., “On the usefulness of earnings and earnings research: Lessons and directions from two decades of empirical research.” Journal of Accounting Research Supplement 27, 153–192, (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mizrach, B., “Multivariate nearest-neighbour forecasts of EMS exchange rates.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 7, S151–S163, (1992a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mizrach, B., Forecast comparison in L2, Working paper, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, (1992b).

  • Pagan, A. and G.W. Schwert, “Alternative models for conditional stock volatility.” Journal of Econometrics 45, 267–290, (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Parzen, E., “On the estimation of probability density and mode.” Annals of Mathematical Statistics 33, 1065–1076, (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  • Philbrick, D.R. and W.E. Ricks, “Using Value Line and IBES analysts forecasts in accounting research.” Journal of Accounting Research 29, 397–415, (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schipper, K., “Analysts' forecasts.” Accounting Horizons 5, 105–121, (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, B.W., Density estimation for statistics and data analysis, London: Chapman and Hall, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H., “A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity.” Econometrica 48, 817–838, (1980).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beneish, M., Harvey, C. Measurement Error and Nonlinearity in the Earnings-Returns Relation. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 11, 219–247 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008362715659

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008362715659

Navigation