Skip to main content
Log in

Using Cointegration Restrictions to Improve Inference in Vector Autoregressive Systems

  • Published:
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An improved way of dealing with uncertain prior information in the context of vector autoregressive systems of equations is proposed. The procedure is appropriate when inference about parameters of a cointegrated system is the aim of the analysis. The estimator uses uncertain prior information about the existence of trends and co-trends in the time series to improve parameter estimation within these systems. The improved estimator eliminates the need to carry out the unit root, cointegration, and parameter restriction pretests and is shown in our Monte Carlo experiments to have good statistical properties in small samples. The pretest, maximum likelihood, and restricted maximum likelihood estimators are compared to the proposed estimator based on squared error risk, mean square error of prediction risk, and out-of-sample root-mean-square forecast error. The Monte Carlo simulations are based on actual economic data collected for eurodollar futures contracts. The evidence suggests that the parameters of vector autoregressive systems can be estimated with lower mean square error with the new estimator even when prior guesses about the nature of the cointegrating vector(s) are incorrect. In-sample prediction is likewise improved. The Monte Carlo simulations are based on eurodollar spot and futures market data that has been used to test the “unbiased expectations” hypothesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adkins, L.C., R.C. Hill, and M. Kim, “Shrinkage Estimation in Nonlinear Models.” Technical Report, Department of Economics, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Adkins, L.C. and R.C. Hill, “Risk Characteristics of a Stein-Like Estimator for the Probit Regression Model.” Economics Letters 30, 19–26 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Akaike, H., “Likelihood of a Model and Information Criteria.” Journal of Econometrics 16, 3–14, (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnhart, S.W. and A.C. Szakmary, “Testing the Unbiased Forward Rate Hypothesis: Evidence on Unit Roots, Cointegration, and Stochastic Coefficients.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 26, 245–267, (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, R.J. and K.F. Kroner, “Arbitrage, Cointegration, and Testing the Unbiasedness Hypothesis in Financial Markets.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 30, 23–42, (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolado, J.J. and H. Lutkepohl, “MakingWald TestsWork for Cointegrated VAR Systems.” Econometric Reviews 15(4), 369–386, (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle, C., “The Forward Discount Anomaly and the Risk Premium: A Survey of Recent Evidence.” Journal of Empirical Finance 3, 123–192, (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakkio, C.S. and M. Rush, “Market Efficiency and Cointegration: An Application to the Sterling and Deutschmark Exchange Markets.” Journal of International Money and Finance 8, 75–88, (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, A.D., H.M. Andersen, and C.W.J. Granger, “ACointegration Analysis of Treasury Bill Yields.” Review of Economics and Statistics 74, 116–126, (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, J.D., Time Series Analysis, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansen, S., “Statistical Analysis of Cointegration Vectors.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 12, 231–254, (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, G.G. and M.E. Bock, The Statistical Implications of Pre-Test and Stein-Rule Estimation in Econometrics, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, G., R.C. Hill, and M.E. Bock, “An Adaptive Empirical Bayes Estimator of the Multivariate Normal Mean Under Quadratic Loss.” Journal of Econometrics 44, 189–213, (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M. and R.C. Hill, “Shrinkage Estimation in Nonlinear Regression: The Box-Cox Transformation.” Journal of Econometrics 66, 1–33, (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Krehbiel, T. and L.C. Adkins, “Cointegration Tests of the Unbiased Expectations Hypothesis in Metals Markets.” Journal of Futures Markets 13, 753–763, (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Krehbiel, T. and L.C. Adkins, “Interest Rate Futures: Evidence on Forecast Power, Expected Premiums, and the Unbiased Expectations Hypothesis.” Journal of Futures Markets 14, 531–543, (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Krehbiel, T. and L.C. Adkins, “Do Systematic Risk Premiums Persist in Eurodollar Futures Prices?.” Journal of Futures Markets 16, 389–403, (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai, K.S. and M. Lai, “A Cointegration Test of Market Efficiency.” Journal of Futures Markets 11, 567–576, (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, B.-S, “The Response of Stock prices to Permanent and Temporary Shocks to Dividends.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 30, 1–22, (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lo, A. and P. Newbold, “Tests for Cointegration in Financial Markets Time Series: What Answer Do You Want?” Advances in Quantitative Analysis of Finance and Accounting 5, 49–60, (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • Naka, A. and G. Whitney, “The Unbiased Forward Rate hypothesis Reexamined.” Journal of International Money and Finance 14, 857–867, (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Norbin, S.C. and K. Reffett, “Exogeneity and Forward Rate Unbiasedness.” Journal of International Money and Finance 15, 267–274, (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran, M.M. and B.B. Pesaran, Microfit 3.0: An Interactive Econometric Software Package, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, P.C.B., “Fully Modified Least Squares and Vector Autoregression.” Econometrica 63, 1023–1078, (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Quintos, C.E., “Fully Modified Vector Autoregressive Inference in Partially Nonstationary Models.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 93, 783–795, (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, G., “Estimating the Dimension of a Model.” Annals of Statistics 6, 461–464, (1978).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Marjory B. Ourso Center for Excellence in Teaching Professor

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Adkins, L.C., Krehbiel, T. & Hill, R.C. Using Cointegration Restrictions to Improve Inference in Vector Autoregressive Systems. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 14, 193–208 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008359830366

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008359830366

Navigation