Journal of East Asian Linguistics

, Volume 8, Issue 4, pp 255–284 | Cite as

Sloppy/Strict Identity, Empty Objects, and NP Ellipsis

  • Soowon Kim


This article proposes that, with Fiengo and May's (1994) indexing theory, a full-fledged reconstruction approach to null argument phenomena in such languages as Chinese, Japanese, and Korean becomes possible. Not only does the present NP-Ellipsis analysis preserve the insight of Otani and Whitman (1991), but it also helps overcome the drawbacks of their VP-Ellipsis analysis of null objects. This article thus argues that null NPs in these languages must be empty phrase- markers underlyingly, not empty pronouns per se, and hence, their reference properties can be determined only at LF after reconstruction. It is shown that this analysis also promises to solve certain binding-theoretic puzzles that null argument phenomena have posed.


Indexing Theory Reconstruction Approach Theoretical Language Reference Property Null Object 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aoun, Joseph, and Nobert Hornstein (1992) “Bound and Referential Pronouns,” in C.-T. James Huang and R. May (eds.), Logical Structure and Linguistic Structure, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
  2. Chomsky, Noam (1986) Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use, Praeger, New York, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Chomsky, Noam (1995) The Minimalist Program, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  4. Cole, Peter, Gabriella Hermon and Li-May Sung (1990) “Principles and Parameters of Long Distance Reflexives,” Linguistic Inquiry 21, 1–22.Google Scholar
  5. Fiengo, Robert and Robert May (1994) Indices and Identity, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  6. Heim, Irene, Howard Lasnik and Robert May (1991) “Reciprocity and Plurality,” Linguistic Inquiry 22, 63–102.Google Scholar
  7. Higginbotham, James (1985) “On Semantics,” Linguistic Inquiry 16, 547–594.Google Scholar
  8. Hoij, Hajime (1991) “Kare,” in Roberta Ishihara and Carol Georgopolous (eds.), Interdisciplinary Approaches to Language: In Honor of Prof. S.-Y. Kuroda, Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  9. Hoji, Hajime (1997) “Otagai,” paper presented at the 16th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, University of Washington, 1997.Google Scholar
  10. Hoji, Hajime (1998) “Null Object and Sloppy Identity in Japanese,” Linguistic Inquiry 29, 127–152.Google Scholar
  11. Huang, C.-T. James (1984) “On the Distribution and Reference of Empty Pronouns,” Linguistic Inquiry 15, 531–574.Google Scholar
  12. Huang, C.-T. James (1987) “Remarks on Empty Categories in Chinese,” Linguistic Inquiry 18, 321–337.Google Scholar
  13. Huang, C.-T. James, and Jane Tang (1991) “The Local Nature of the Long-Distance Reflexive in Chinese,” in Jan Koster and Eric Reuland (eds.), Long-Distance Anaphora, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 263–282.Google Scholar
  14. Jackendoff, Ray (1992) “Mme. Tussaud Meets the Binding Theory,” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 10, 1–31.Google Scholar
  15. Katada, Fusa (1991) “The LF Representation of Anaphors,” Linguistic Inquiry 22, 287–313.Google Scholar
  16. Kitagawa, Yoshihisa (1991) “Copying Identity,” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9, 497–536.Google Scholar
  17. Lasnik, Howard (1991) “On the Necessity of Binding Conditions,” in Robert Freidin (ed.), Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 7–28.Google Scholar
  18. Maling, Joan and Soowon Kim (1992) “Case Assignment in the Inalienable Possession Construction in Korean,” Journal of East Asian Linguistics 1, 37–68.Google Scholar
  19. Moon, Seung Chul (1995) An Optimality Approach to Long Distance Anaphora, PhD dissertation, University of Washington.Google Scholar
  20. Otani, Kazuyo and John Whitman (1991) “V-Raising and VP-Ellipsis,” Linguistic Inquiry 22, 345–358.Google Scholar
  21. Reinhart, Tanya and Eric Reuland (1993) “Reflexivity,” Linguistic Inquiry 24, 657–720.Google Scholar
  22. Pollock, Jean-Ives (1989) “Verb Movement, Universal Grammar, and the Structure of IP,” Linguistic Inquiry 20, 365–424.Google Scholar
  23. Saito, Mamoru and Hajime Hoji (1983) “Weak Crossover and Move-Alpha in Japanese,” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1, 245–259.Google Scholar
  24. Sag, Ivan (1976) Deletion and Logical Form, PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
  25. Sells, Peter (1995) “Korean and Japanese Morphology from a Lexical Perspective,” Linguistic Inquiry 26, 277–325.Google Scholar
  26. Whitman, John (1988) “Discourse Ellipsis and the Identity of Zero Pronouns,” in The Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.), Linguistics in the Morning Calm II, Hanshin Publishing Company, Seoul, pp. 149–175.Google Scholar
  27. Williams, Edwin (1977) “Discourse and Logical Form,” Linguistic Inquiry 8, 101–139.Google Scholar
  28. Xu, Liejiong (1986) “Free Empty Category,” Linguistic Inquiry 17, 75–93.Google Scholar
  29. Yoon, James Hye-Suk (1989) “The Grammar of Inalienable Possession Constructions in Korean, Mandarin and French,” in Susumu Kuno et al. (eds.), Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics III, Hanshin Publishing Company, Seoul, pp. 357–368.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Soowon Kim
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of LinguisticsUniversity of WashingtonSeattleU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations