Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The consequences of deregulation: A comparison of the experiences of UK building societies with those of US Savings and Loan Associations

  • Published:
Crime, Law and Social Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It has been estimated that deregulation of US S&Ls will cost the US taxpayer £500bn in terms of the compensation paid out for the resulting scandals and failures. In contrast, the deregulation of UK building societies, although initially followed by a series of scandals and losses of £1bn., eventually resulted in substantially increased profitability. The social effects in the UK have been quite different to those in the US. As a result of the increased importance placed on profitability as opposed to mutuality, many homeowners have had their properties repossessed, and investors been mis-soId unsuitable investments. However, UK building societies, by a mixture of good luck and judgement, have avoided the principal regulatory pitfalls, which beset the S&Ls in terms of bankruptcies and fraud. This paper seeks to explain these different post-deregulation experiences. It extends to the UK the looting model of Akerlof and Romer (1993) and the managerial diversion model of Nichols (1972) which went so far to explain and anticipate, respectively, the US experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akerlof, G.A. and Romer, P.M. (1993). “Looting: The Economic Underworld of Bankruptcy for Profit”, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2, pp.1-73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Annual Report of the Building Societies Commissioner (BSC), (various issues), London, H.M.S.O.

  • Barnes, P. (1983). “The Consequences of Growth Maximization and Expense Preference Policies of Managers: Evidence from the UK Building Societies”, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, pp.521-530.

  • Barnes, P. (1984). Building Societies: The Myth of Mutuality, London, Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, P. (1988). “Developments in the Regulation of UK Building Societies Concerning Conflicts of Interest and Diversion of their Funds”, Corruption and Reform, 3, pp.81-94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, P. (1992). “Building Societies: No Longer Safe as Houses?” Accountancy, 109, pp.28-29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, P. and M. Ward (1996). “The Regulation of Conflicts of Interest in UK building societies”, in Anti-Corruption for Social Stability and Development, Collected Works of the Seventh International Ant-Corruption Conference, Beijing, IACC, pp.511-519.

  • Barth, J.R. and Bradley, M.G. (1989). “Thrift Deregulation and Federal Deposit Insurance” Journal of Financial Services Research, pp. 231-239.

  • Barth, J.R., Bartholomew, P.F. and Bradley, M.G. (1990). “Determinants of Thrift Institution Resolution Costs”, Journal of Finance, 45, pp.731-734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, T.L. and Bowie, N.E. (1988). Ethical Theory and Business, (Third Edition), Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benston, G.J. (1986). An Analysis of the Causes of Savings and Loan Failures, New York, New York University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benston, G.J. and Kaufman, G.G. (1990). “Understanding the Savings and Loans Debacle” The Public Interest, Spring, pp.79-95.

  • Berle, A.A. and Means, G.C. (1934). The Modern Corporation and Private Property, New York, Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, S. and Waldren, K. (1987). “Building Society for Tarts”, The People, 6 December, p.13.

  • Building Societies Act, 1960.

  • Building Societies Act, 1962.

  • Building Societies Act, 1986.

  • Building Societies Association (“BSA”) (1990–1996). Who's Who in Building Societies, London, Franey & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cadbury Committee (1992). Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance, Final Report.

  • Calavitta, K. and Pontell, H.N. (1994). “The State and White-Collar Crime: Saving the Savings and Loans”, Law and Society Review, 28(2), pp.297-324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calavitta, K., Tillman, R. and Pell, H.N. (1997). “The Savings and Loan Debacle, Financial Crime, and the State”, Annual Review Sociology, 23, pp.19-38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, G., Dodds, J.C., Driscol, M.J. and Ford, J.L. (1975). The Portfolio and Debt Behaviour of British Building Societies, Societe Universitaire Europeene de Recherches Financiers, Series A, Tilburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleary, E.J. (1965). The Building Societies Movement, London, Elek Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Community Development Project (1976). Profits against Houses, Project Information and Intelligence Unit.

  • Conyon, M., Gregg, P. and Machin, S. (1995). “Taking Care of Business: Executive Compensation in the United Kingdom”, The Economic Journal, 105, pp. 704-714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, H. and Hill, J.W. (1993). “The Association between S&Ls Deviation from GAAP and their Survival” Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 12, pp.65-83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, H.M. and Verbrugge, J.A. (1978). “Structure and Performance in the Savings and Loan Industry”, Journal of Economics and Business, pp.40-51.

  • DeGennaro, R.P., Lang, L.H.P. and Thomson, J.B. (1993). “Troubled Savings and loan Institutions: Turnaround Strategies under Insolvency” Financial Management, pp.163-175.

  • Drake, L. (1989). The Building Society in Transition, Basingstoke, Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake, L. (1995). “Testing for Expense Preference Behaviour in UK Building Societies”, Services Industries Journal, 15(1), pp.50-65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E.F. and Jensen, M.C. (1983). “Separation of Ownership and Control”, Journal of Law and Economics, 26, pp.301-326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregg, P., Machin, S. and Szymanski, S. (1993). “The Disappearing Relationship Between Director's Pay and Corporate Performance”, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 31, pp.1-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gropper, D.M. (1995). “Product-Line Deregulation and the Cost Structure of US Savings and Loan Associations” Applied Economics, 27, pp.183-191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay-Davidson, I. and Stuart-Smoth, M. (1979). Grays Building Society, Investigation Under Section 110 of the Building Societies Act 1962, London, HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, E. (1969). “Conflicts of Interest in the Savings and Loan Industry” in A Study of the Savings and Loan Industry, 641, directed by I. Friend, Washington, FHLBB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermalin, B.E. and Wallace, N.E. (1994). “The Determinants of Efficiency and Solvency In Savings and Loans” Rand Journal of Economics, 25, pp.361-381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • House of Commons Treasury and Civil Service Committee, Second Report Financial Services Regulation: The Building Society Sector, HMSO, London, 19th December 1994 and Sixth Report, The Regulation of Financial Services in the UK, 23rd October 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingham, H. and Thompson, S. (1993). “Executive Compensation and Deregulation in UK Building Societies”, Accounting and Business Research, 23, pp.373-383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingham, H. and Thompson, S. (1995). “Mutuality, Performance and Executive Compensation”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 57, pp.295-308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland, Association of Certified Accountants Joint Disciplinary Scheme (“JDS”), Report and Findings of a Committee of Inquiry in the Matter of the Glamorgan Building Society in Relation to Mr D.S. John, 1987.

  • Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland, Association of Certified Accountants Joint Disciplinary Scheme (“JDS”), In the Matter of the New Cross Building Society. Report and Findings of the Committee of Inquiry in respect of the Accountant Directors of the Society, 1987.

  • Jensen, M.C. and Meckling, W.H. (1975). “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behaviour, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure”, Journal of Financial Economics, 3, pp.305-360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, E.J. (1989). The S&L Insurance Mess: How did it happen? Washington, D.C. Urban Institute Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, E.J. (1990). “Principal-Agent Problems in S&L Salvage”, Journal of Finance, 45, pp.755-764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay, J. (1991). “The Economics of Mutuality”, Annals of Public and Co-operative Economics, 62, pp.309-318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, T., Walters, M. and Ovey, E. (1989). Wurtzburg and Mills' Building Society Law, London, Stevens & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKillop, D.G. and Ferguson, C. (1993). Building Societies: Structure, Performance and Change, London, Graham and Trotman.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKillop, D.G. and Glass, J.C. (1994). “A Cost Model of Building Societies as Producers of Mortgages and other Financial Products”, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 21(7), pp.1031-1046.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezias, S.J. (1994). “Financial Meltdown as Normal Accident: The Case of the American Savings and Loan Industry”, Accounting, Organisations and Society, 19, pp. 181-192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, K. (1994). “Scandal — the Juicier History of Building Societies”, Mortgage Finance, October, pp.32-34.

  • New Cross Building Society, 1984, (Command. 9033), London, HMSO.

  • National Consumer Council (1981). Building Societies and the Consumer.

  • Nichols, A. (1972). Management and Control in the Mutual Savings and Loan Association, Lexington, Mass., Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, A. (1967). “Stock versus Mutual Savings and Loan Associations: Some Evidence of Differences in Behaviour”, American Economic Review, 57, pp.337-346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Fair Trading (1995). Mortgage Repayment Methods, Report no. 131, London, Iros.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Hara, M. (1981). “Property Rights and the Financial Firm”, Journal of Law and Economics, 24, pp.317-332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perks, R.W. (1991). “The Fight to stay Mutual: Abbey Members Against Floatation versus Abbey National Building Society”, Annals of Public and Co-operative Economics, 62, pp.393-427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Report of the Chief Registrar of Friendly Societies (RCRFS), 1979 and 1961.

  • Robson Rhodes (1996). Mortgage Lenders: A Commentary on Current Issues.

  • Roe, M.J. (1997). “The Political Roots of American Corporate Governance” Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 9(4), pp.8-22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saylors, K.N. (1994). “Conflict's of Interest in Family Law”, Family Law Quarterly, 28, pp.451-473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelton, D. (1990). “The Impact of the Financial Services Act on the Availability of Independent Financial Advice”, 16, Managerial Finance, pp.3-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, T. and Mason, R. (1998). “Long Tail Risks and Endogenous Liabilities: Regulating Looting”, The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance: Issues and Practice, 87, April, pp.182-195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, D.F. (1993). “Mediated Corruption: The Case of the Keating Five.” American Political Science Review. 87(2), pp.369-381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tillman, R., Calavitta, K. and Pontelli, H.N. (1997). “Criminalising White-Collar Misconduct” Crime Law and Social Change, 26(1), pp.53-76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbrugge, J.A. and Jahera, J.S. (1981). “Expense Preference Behavior in the Savings and Loan Industry”, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 13, pp.465-476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbrugge, J.A. and Shick, R.A. (1976). “Market Structure and Savings and Loan Profitability”, Quarterly Review of Economics and Business, pp.79-96.

  • White, L.J. (1981). Reforming Regulation: Processes and Problems, Engewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, L.J. (1991). The S&L Debacle, New York, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, J.J. (1995). “Getting the Accounting ‘Right': Accounting and the Savings and Loan Crisis”, Accounting, Organisations and Society, 20, pp.55-80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Nottingham Business School, Nottingham, NG7~2RD, England, (e-mail

    Paul Barnes

  2. Nottingham Business School, Nottingham, NG1~4BU, England

    Martin Ward

Authors
  1. Paul Barnes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Martin Ward
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barnes, P., Ward, M. The consequences of deregulation: A comparison of the experiences of UK building societies with those of US Savings and Loan Associations. Crime, Law and Social Change 31, 209–244 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008347107079

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008347107079

Keywords

Search

Navigation