Skip to main content
Log in

Measuring Investment Risk Based on Tail Thickness

  • Published:
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years, both institutional andindividual investors have come to rely heavilyupon techniques for analyzing (defining andmeasuring) risk. In this respect, the issue thatcontinues to require the attention of academicresearchers and practitioners alike is how toconcisely define investment risk and, moreimportantly, how to best measure it. Selecting anappropriate risk definition involves trade-offsamong ease of measurement, forecast ability, andintuition of individual investors. The purpose ofthis paper is to present an alternative index formeasuring unconditional (or total) risk. Theproposed measure reflects behavior in general, andthickness in particular, of the lower tail of thedistribution of returns. We therefore argue itprovides a more useful and reasonable indexbecause, unlike measures frequently used, itsestimation depends upon the most relevant datafrom the sample distribution. We describe riskanalysis based on lower tail behavior and identifyits advantages over existing methods. Finally,using data of weekly returns to the CREF StockFund, we provide an empirical example toillustrate the technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnold, B. C., Pareto Distributions, Fairland, MD: International Cooperative Publishing House, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davison, A., “Modeling Excesses over High Thresholds, with an Application.” in J. Tiago de Oliveria (Ed.), Statistical Extremes and Application, Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekkers, A. L. M. and L. de Hann, “On the Estimation of the Extreme-Value Index and Large Quantile Estimation.” The Annals of Statistics 17, 1795–1832, (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • DuMouchel, W. H., “Estimating the Stable Index α in Order to Measure Tail Thickness: A Critique.” The Annals of Statistics 11, 1019–1031, (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Elton, E. J. and M. J. Gruber, Modern Portfolio Theory and Investment Analysis, 5th edn. New York: Wiley, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadar, J. and W. R. Russell, “Rules for Ordering Uncertain Prospects.” American Economic Review 59, 25–34, (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughey, R. L., “A Survey and Comparison of Methods for Estimating Extreme Right Tail-area Quantiles.” Commun. Stat. Theory and Method 20, 1463–1469, (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, D. W. and C. G. De Vries, “On the Frequency of Large Stock Returns: Putting Booms and Busts into Perspective.” Review of Economics and statistics 73, 18–24, (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, E. L., “Comparing Location Experiments.” The Annals of Statistics 16, 521–533, (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Longin, F. M., “The Asymptotic Distribution of Extreme Stock Market Returns.” Journal of Business 69, 383–408, (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, A. and P. Klaassen, “Extreme Returns, Downside Risk, and Optimal Asset Allocation.” Journal of Portfolio Management 25, Fall, 71–79, (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nawrocki, D. N., “A Brief History of Downside Risk Measures.” Journal of Investing 8, Fall, 9–25, (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Neftci, S. N., “Value at Risk Calculations, Extreme Events, and Tail Estimation.” Journal of Derivatives 7, Spring, 23–37, (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson, M., “The Extreme Value Method for Estimating the Variance Rate of Returns.” Journal of Business 53, 61–65, (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickands, J., “Statistical Inference Using Extreme Order Statistics.” The Annals of Statistics 3, 119–130, (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Phoa, W., “Estimating Credit Spread Risk Using Extreme Value Theory.” Journal of Portfolio Management 25, Spring, 69–73, (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rojo, J., “On Tail Categorization of Probability Laws.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 91, 378–384, (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, M. and J. E. Stiglitz, “Increasing Risk: I. A Definition.” Journal of Economic Theory 2, 225–243, (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. L., “Estimating Tails of Probability Distributions.” The Annals of Statistics 15, 1174–1207, (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. L. and I. Weissman, “Large Deviations of Tail Estimators Based on the Pareto Approximation.” Journal of Applied Probability 24, 619–630, (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. L. and A. C. Davison, “Extreme Value Theory,” in W. Leadermann (Ed.), Handbook of Applicable Mathematics 7, New York: Wiley, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, W. S. and S. M. Kokoska, “An Option-based Approach to Portfolio Performance Evaluation,” in C. F. Lee and S. N. Chen (Eds.), Advances in Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management 5, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tse, K. S. M., J. Uppal and M. A. White, “Downside Risk and Investment Choice.” The Financial Review 28, November, 585–606, (1993).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dargahi-Noubary, G.R., Smith, W.S. Measuring Investment Risk Based on Tail Thickness. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 16, 81–93 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008344525099

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008344525099

Keywords

Navigation