Skip to main content
Log in

Geometric Constructions in the Digital Plane

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We adapt several important properties from affine geometry so that they become applicable in the digital plane. Each affine property is first reformulated as a property about line transversals. Known results about transversals are then used to derive Helly type theorems for the digital plane. The main characteristic of a Helly type theorem is that it expresses a relation holding for a collection of geometric objects in terms of simpler relations holding for some of the subcollections. For example, we show that in the digital plane a collection of digital lines is parallel if and only if each of its 2-membered subcollections consists of two parallel digital lines. The derived Helly type theorems lead to many applications in digital image processing. For example, they provide an appropriate setting for verifying whether lines detected in a digital image satisfy the constraints imposed by a perspective projection. The results can be extended to higher dimensions or to other geometric systems, such as projective geometry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A.B. Amenta, “Helly theorems and generalized linear programming,” Ph.D. thesis, University of California at Berkeley, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  2. T.A. Anderson and C.E. Kim, “Representation of digital line segments and their preimages,” Comput. Vision Graphics Image Process., Vol. 30, pp. 279–288, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  3. E. Andres, R. Acharya, and C. Sibata, “Discrete analytical hyperplanes,” CVGIP: Graphical Models and Image Processing, Vol. 59, pp. 302–309, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Atallah and C. Bajaj, “Efficient algorithms for common transversals,” Inform. Process. Lett., Vol. 25, pp. 87–91, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. Avis and M. Doskas, “Algorithms for high dimensional stabbing problems,” Discrete Applied Math., Vol. 27, pp. 39–48, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  6. L. Danzer, B. Grünbaum, and V. Klee, “Helly' theorem and its relatives,” in Proceedings of the Symposium on Pure Mathematics, Vol. 7, Convexity, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1963, pp. 101–180.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Dhome, M. Richetin, J.-T. Lapresté, and G. Rives, “Determination of the attitude of 3-D objects from a single perspective view,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell., Vol. 11, pp. 1265–1278, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  8. L. Dorst and A. Smeulders, “Discrete representation of straight lines,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell., Vol. 6, pp. 450–462, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  9. L. Dorst and A. Smeulders, “Discrete straight line segments: parameters, primitives and properties,” in Vision Geometry, R.A. Melter, A. Rosenfeld, and P. Bhattacharya (Eds.), Contemporary Mathematics Series, Vol. 119, American Mathematical Society, 1991, pp. 45–61.

  10. H. Hadwiger and H. Debrunner, Combinatorial Geometry in the Plane, Holt, Rinehart and Winston: New York, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  11. E. Helly, “Über Mengen konvexer Körper mit gemeinschaftligen Punkten,” Jahresber. D.M.V., Vol. 32, pp. 175–176, 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  12. C.E. Kim, “Three-dimensional digital line segments,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell., Vol. 5, pp. 231–234, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  13. D.G. Larman, “Helly type properties of unions of convex sets,” Mathematika, Vol. 15, pp. 53–59, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  14. M.D. McIlroy, “Anote on discrete representation of lines,”AT&T Technical Journal, Vol. 64, pp. 481–490, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  15. G.F. McLean, “Geometric correction of digitized art,” CVGIP: Graphical Models and Image Processing, Vol. 58, pp. 142–154, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  16. F.P. Preparata and M.I. Shamos, Computational Geometry, Springer-Verlag: New York, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J.-P. Reveillès, “Géométrie discrète, calcul en nombres entiers et algorithmique,” Thèse d'Etat, Université Louis Pasteur, Strasbourg, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  18. R.T. Rockafellar, Convex Analysis, Princeton Univerisity Press: Princeton, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  19. C. Ronse, “Asimple proof of Rosenfeld' characterization of digital straight line segments,” Pattern Recognition Letters, Vol. 3, pp. 323–326, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  20. C. Ronse, “Criteria for approximation of linear and affine functions,” Arch. Math., Vol. 46, pp. 371–384, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  21. C. Ronse, “A note on the approximation of linear and affine functions: The case of bounded slope,” Arch. Math., Vol. 54, pp. 601–609, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  22. A. Rosenfeld, “Digital straight line segments,” IEEE Trans. Comput., Vol. 23, pp. 1264–1269, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  23. J. Stoer and C. Witzgall, Convexity and Optimization in Finite Dimensions I, Springer: Berlin, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  24. I. StojmenoviĆ and R. TošiĆ, “Digitization schemes and the recognition of digital straight lines, hyperplanes, and flats in arbitrary dimensions,” in Vision Geometry, R.A. Melter, A. Rosenfeld, and P. Bhattacharya (Eds.), Contemporary Mathematics Series, Vol. 119, American Mathematical Society, 1991, pp. 197–212.

  25. H. Tverberg, “Proof of Grünbaum' conjecture on common transversals for translates,” Discrete Comput. Geom., Vol. 4, pp. 191–203, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  26. F. Ulupinar and R. Nevatia, “Constraints for interpretation of line drawings under perspective projection,” CVGIP: Image Understanding, Vol. 53, pp. 88–96, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  27. F.A. Valentine, “The dual cone and Helly type theorems,” in Proceedings of the Symposium on Pure Mathematics, Vol. 7, Convexity, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1963, pp. 473–493.

    Google Scholar 

  28. P. Veelaert, “On the flatness of digital hyperplanes,” J. Math. Imaging and Vision, Vol. 3, pp. 205–221, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  29. P. Veelaert, “Helly type theorems in the digital plane,” Technical report DG98-01, University of Ghent, Dept. ELIS, 1998.

  30. R. Wenger, “Ageneralization of Hadwiger' transversal theorem to intersecting sets,” Discrete Comput. Geom., Vol. 5, pp. 383–388, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Veelaert, P. Geometric Constructions in the Digital Plane. Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision 11, 99–118 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008325426721

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008325426721

Navigation