Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reference to Kinds across Language

Natural Language Semantics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Cite this article

Abstract

This paper is devoted to the study of bare nominal arguments (i.e., determinerless NPs occurring in canonical argumental positions) from a crosslinguistic point of view. It is proposed that languages may vary in what they let their NPs denote. In some languages (like Chinese), NPs are argumental (names of kinds) and can thus occur freely without determiner in argument position; in others they are predicates (Romance), and this prevents NPs from occurring as arguments, unless the category D(eterminer) is projected. Finally, there are languages (like Germanic or Slavic) which allow both predicative and argumental NPs; these languages, being the ‘union’ of the previous two types, are expected to behave like Romance for certain aspects of their nominal system (the singular count portion) and like Chinese for others (the mass and plural portions). This hypothesis (the ‘Nominal Mapping Parameter’) is investigated not just through typological considerations, but also through a detailed contrastive analysis of bare arguments in Germanic (English) vs. Romance (Italian). Some general consequences of this view, which posits a limited variation in the mapping from syntax into semantics, for current theories of Universal Grammar and acquisition are considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

REFERENCES

  • Barker, C.: 1992, ‘Group Terms in English: Representing Groups as Atoms’, Journal of Semantics 9, 69–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, J. and R. Cooper: 1981, ‘Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language’, Linguistics and Philosophy 4, 159–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benincà, P.: 1980, ‘Nomi senza Articolo’, Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 5, 51–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, S.: 1991, The Semantics of Open Sentences, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

  • Cardinaletti, A. and G. Giusti: 1992, ‘Partitive Ne and the QP-Hypothesis’, in E. Fava (ed.), Proceedings of the XVII Meeting of Generative Grammar, Rosenberg and Sellier, Turin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, G.: 1977, Reference to Kinds in English, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst. Published in 1980 by Garland, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, G.: 1996, ‘A Note on Belladonnas’, paper delivered at the 1996 LSA Annual Meeting.

  • Carlson, G. and J. Pelletier (eds): 1995, The Generic Book, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, L. and R. Sybesma: 1996, ‘yi-wan Tang, yi-ge Tang: Classifiers and Massifiers’, ms., UC Irvine and HIL, Leiden; forthcoming in Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies, Tsing-Hua University, Taiwan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chierchia, G.: 1984, Topics in the Syntax and Semantics of Infinitives and Gerunds, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst. Published in 1988 by Garland, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chierchia, G.: 1995a, ‘Individual Level Predicates as Inherent Generics’, in G. Carlson and J. Pelletier (eds.), The Generic Book, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chierchia, G.: 1995b, Dynamics of Meaning, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chierchia, G.: 1996, ‘Plurality of Mass Nouns and the Notion of “Semantic Parameter”’, DIPSCO Working Papers, Milan. A revised version appeared in S. Rothstein (ed.), Events and Grammar, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1998.

  • Chierchia, G.: 1998, ‘Partitives, Reference to Kinds and Semantic Variation’, in Proceedings of SALT VII, Cornell University, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chierchia, G. and R. Turner: 1988, ‘Semantics and Property Theory’, Linguistics and Philosophy 11, 261–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cinque, G: 1990, Types of A'-Dependencies, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cinque, G: 1994, ‘On the Evidence for Partial N-movement in the Romance DP’, in G. Cinque, J. Koster, J-Y. Pollock, L. Rizzi and R. Zanuttini (eds.), Paths Towards Universal Grammar, Georgetown University Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.: 1995, The Minimalist Program, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Contreras, H.: 1986, ‘Spanish Bare NP's and the ECP’, in I. Bordelois, H. Contreras and K. Zagona (eds.), Generative Studies in Spanish Syntax, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dayal, V.: 1992, ‘The Singular-Plural Distinction in Hindi Generics’, in Proceedings of SALT II(OSU Working Papers in Linguistics), The Ohio State University, Columbus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delfitto, D. and J. Schroten: 1992, ‘Bare Plurals and the Number Affix in DP's’, OTS Working Papers, OTS, Utrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Villiers, J. and P. De Villiers: 1973, ‘A Cross-sectional Study of the Acquisition of Grammatical Morphemes in Child Speech’, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 2, 267–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diesing, M.: 1992, Indefinites, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobrovie-Sorin, C. and B. Laca: 1996, ‘Generic Bare NP's’, ms, University of Paris.

  • Evans, G.: 1980, ‘Pronouns’, Linguistic Inquiry 11, 337–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, D.: 1995, ‘Economy and Scope’, Natural Language Semantics 3, 283–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G.: 1891, ‘Funktion und Begriff’, Pohle, Jena; English translation in P. Geach and M. Black (eds.), Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, Blackwell, Oxford.

  • Geenhoven, V. van: 1996, Semantic Incorporation and Indefinite Descriptions, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Tübingen.

  • Gerstner, C. and M. Krifka: 1993, ‘Genericity’, in J. Jacobs, A. von Stechow, W. Sternefeld and Th. Venneman (eds.), Handbuch der Syntax, de Gruyter, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillon, B.: 1992, ‘Towards a Common Semantics for English Count and Mass Nouns’, Linguistics and Philosophy, 15, 597–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi, A. and G. Longobardi: 1991, The Syntax of Noun Phrases, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groenendijk, J. and M. Stokhof: 1984, Studies in the Semantics of Questions and the Pragmatics of Answers, Akademisch Proefschrift, University of Amsterdam.

  • Heim, I.: 1982, The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite NP's, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst. Published in 1989 by Garland, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, I.: 1991, ‘Artikel und Definitheit’, in A. von Stechow and D. Wunderlich (eds.), Handbuch der Semantik, de Gruyter, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higginbotham, J.: 1994, ‘Mass and Count Quantifiers’, Linguistics and Philosophy 17, 447–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, H.: 1981, ‘A Theory of Truth and Discourse Representation’, in J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen and M. Stokhof (eds.), Formal Methods in the Study of Language, Mathematical Centre, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleiber, 1990, L'article ‘le’ generique: La genericite sur la mode massif, Librarie Droz, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, A.: 1989, ‘An Investigation of the Lumps of Thought’, Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 607–653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, A.: 1995, ‘Individual Level Predicates vs. Stage Level Predicates’, in G. Carlson and J. Pelletier (eds.), The Generic Book, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, A.: 1996, ‘Scope or Pseudoscope? Are There Wide Scope Indefinites?’, ms., University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Also in S. Rothstein (ed.), Events and Grammar, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krifka, M.: 1988, ‘The Relational Theory of Generics’, in M. Krifka (ed.), Genericity in Natural Language, SNS-Bericht 88–42, University of Tübingen.

  • Krifka, M.: 1989, ‘Nominal Reference, Temporal Constitution and Quantification in Event Semantics’, in J. van Benthem, P. van Emde Boas and R. Bartsch (eds.), Semantics and Contextual Expressions, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krifka, M.: 1995, ‘Common Nouns: A Contrastive Analysis of Chinese and English’, in G. Carlson and J. Pelletier (eds.), The Generic Book, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krifka, M. et al.: 1995, ‘Genericity: An Introduction’ in G. Carlson and J. Pelletier (eds.), The Generic Book, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S.: 1972, ‘Naming and Necessity’, in D. Davidson and G. Harman (eds.), Semantics of Natural Language, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahiri, U.: 1991, Embedded Interrogatives and the Predicates that Embed Them, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

  • Landman, F.: 1989, ‘Groups I’, Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 559–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landman, F.: 1991, Structures for Semantics, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landman, F.: 1996, Events and Plurality: The Jerusalem Lectures, ms., Tel Aviv University.

  • Lewis, D.: 1975, ‘Adverbs of Quantification’, in E. Keenan (ed.), Formal Semantics of Natural Language, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y-h. A.: 1997, ‘Structures and Interpretations of Nominal Expressions’, ms., University of Southern California.

  • Link, G.: 1983, ‘The Logical Analysis of Plural and Mass Nouns: A Lattice Theoretic Approach’, in R. Bäuerle, C. Schwarze and A. von Stechow (eds.), Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language, de Gruyer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longobardi, G.: 1994, ‘Reference and Proper Names: A Theory of N-Movement in Syntax and Logical Form’, Linguistic Inquiry 25, 609–665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longobardi, G.: 1996, ‘The Syntax of N-Raising: A Minimalist Theory’, OTS Working Papers, OTS, Utrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNally, L.: 1992, An Interpretation of the English Existential Construction, Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNally, L.: 1995, ‘Bare Plurals in Spanish Are Interpreted as Properties’, ms, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.

  • Milsark, G.: 1974, Existential Sentences in English, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT

  • Moro, A.: 1996, The Raising of Predicates, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ojeda, A.: 1993, Linguistic Individuals, CSLI, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee, B. H.: 1987, ‘Noun Phrase Interpretation and Type-Shifting Principles’, in J. Groenendijk et al. (eds.), Studies in Discourse Representation Theory and the Theory of Generalized Quantifiers, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee, B. H. and M. Rooth: 1983, ‘Generalized Conjunction and Type Ambiguity’, in R. Bäuerle, C. Schwarze and A. von Stechow (eds.), Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language, de Gruyter, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. v. O.: 1939, ‘Designation and Existence’, Journal of Philosophy 36, 701–709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. v. O.: 1960, Word and Object, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhart, T.: 1997, ‘Quantifier Scope: How Labor is Divided between QR and Choice Functions’, Linguistics and Philosophy 20, 335–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzi, L.: 1990, Relativized Minimality, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzi, L.: 1996, ‘On the Fine Structure of the Left Periphery’, ms., University of Geneva.

  • Schwarzschild, R.: 1990, ‘Against Groups’ in M. Stokhof and L. Torenvliet (eds.), Proceedings of the VIIth Amsterdam Colloquium, ITLI, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzschild, R.: 1996, Pluralities, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selkirk, L.: 1977, ‘Some Remarks on Noun Phrase Structure’, in P. Culicover, T. Wasow and A. Akmajian (eds.), Formal Syntax, Academic Press.

  • Sharvy: 1980, ‘A More General Theory of Definite Descriptions’, The Philosophical Review 89, 607–624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stowell, T.: 1978, ‘What Was There Before There Was There’, in D. Farkas et al. (eds.), Proceedings of CLS 14, Chicago.

  • Stowell, T.: 1991, ‘Determiners in NP and DP’, in K. Leffel and D. Bouchard (eds.), Views on Phrase Structure, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrego, E.: 1989, ‘Unergative-Unaccusative Alternations in Spanish’, MIT Working Papers, Cambridge, MA.

  • Wexler, K. and R. Manzini: 1987, ‘Parameters and Learnability’, in T. Roeper and E. Williams (eds.) Parameter Setting, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, K.: 1991, Studies in the Semantics of Generic NP's, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst

  • Wilkinson, K.: 1995, ‘The Semantics of the Common Noun Kind’, in G. Carlson and J. Pelletier (eds.), The Generic Book, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, Y.: 1997, ‘Choice Functions and the Scopal Semantics of Indefinites’, Linguistics and Philosophy 20, 399–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zamparelli, R.: 1995, Layers in the Determiner Phrase, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Rochester.

  • Zucchi, A.: 1995, ‘The Ingredients of the Definiteness Effect’, Natural Language Semantics 3, 33–78.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Istituto di glottologia e lingue orientali, Università degli studi di Milano, Via Festa del Perdono N.7, 20122, Milano, Italy, E-mail: Email

    Gennaro Chierchia

Authors
  1. Gennaro Chierchia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chierchia, G. Reference to Kinds across Language. Natural Language Semantics 6, 339–405 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008324218506

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008324218506

Keywords

search

Navigation