Skip to main content
Log in

A Rationale for the WTO Prohibition of Export Subsidies: Strategic Export Subsidies and World Welfare

  • Published:
Open Economies Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article presents a model that provides an economic rationale for multilateral agreements, such as the WTO, that prohibit export subsidies. The model is a multicountry version of the well-known Brander and Spencer (Journal of International Economics (1985) 18, 83–100) analysis of profit-shifting export subsidies, with the addition of an opportunity cost of government revenue greater than unity, as in Neary (Journal of International Economics (1994) 37, 197–218) to capture the fact that the export subsidy will typically be funded by distortionary taxation. It explains the unilateral incentive for welfare-maximizing governments to provide export subsidies and shows how the multilateral prohibition of export subsidies may increase world welfare.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bagwell, K. and R.W. Staiger (1997) “Strategic Export Subsidies and Reciprocal Trade Agreements: The Natural Monopoly Case.” Japan and the World Economy 9:491–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brander, J.A. and B.J. Spencer (1985) “Export Subsidies and International Market Share Rivalry.” Journal of International Economics 18:83–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulow, J.I., J.D. Geanakoplos, and P.D. Klemperer (1985) “Multimarket Oligopoly: Strategic Substitutes and Complements.” Journal of Political Economy 93:488–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collie, D.R. (1993) “Profit-Shifting Export Subsidies and the Sustainability of Free Trade.” Scottish Journal of Political Economy 40:408–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collie, D.R. (1997) “Bilateralism is Good: Trade Blocs and Strategic Export Subsidies.” Oxford Economic Papers 49:504–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collie, D.R. (2000) “State Aid in the European Union: The Prohibition of Subsidies in an Integrated Market.” International Journal of Industrial Organisation 18:867–884.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collie, D.R. and D. de Meza (1986) “Inadequacies of the Strategic Rationale of Export Subsidies.” Economics Letters 22:369–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A.K. (1984) “International Trade Policy for Oligopolistic Industries.” Economic Journal 94 (Supplement):1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J.W. (1971) “A Non-Cooperative Equilibrium for Supergames.” Review of Economic Studies 38:1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neary, J.P. (1994) “Cost Asymmetries in International Subsidy Games: Should Governments Help Winners or Losers?'' Journal of International Economics 37:197–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, J.E. (1995) Managing Official Export Credits: The Quest for a Global Regime. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schott, J.J. (1994) The Uruguay Round: An Assessment. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, A. and R.S. Warren (1996) “The Marginal Cost of Funds: Theory and Evidence.” Journal of Public Economics 61:289–305.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Collie, D.R. A Rationale for the WTO Prohibition of Export Subsidies: Strategic Export Subsidies and World Welfare. Open Economies Review 11, 229–245 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008322823299

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008322823299

Navigation