Skip to main content

Collusion Proof Transfer Payment Schemes with Multiple Agents


Most of the current studies on transfer pricing under asymmetric information focus on a single principal and a single agent. Under a separating management and ownership assumption, transfer pricing is at minimum a three-person problem involving one principal and two agents. This paper considers a transfer pricing problem with two agents who possess private information and seek to maximize their net cash flows, instead of divisional accounting profits. The objectives of this paper are: (1) to derive a direct-revelation mechanism that induces truth telling and efficient allocation; (2) to study the agents' collusion behaviors under the direct-revelation mechanism. The findings indicate that when agents have the option to quit after contracting, it is optimal for the center to produce less than the first-best output level unless the costs for both divisions are at their lowest levels. The optimal amount of underproduction varies according to the demand condition. In addition, two sets of transfer functions, named as identical and nonidentical functions, are derived to induce truth-telling and yield optimal equilibrium output. The two sets of transfer functions are subject to collusion. However, the functions induce different collusion behaviors among agents, that is, the collusion sets for both functions are not common sets. This property enables us to eliminate any collusion between agents, particularly prior to their observation of private information.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.


  • Antle, R. and G. Eppen, “Capital Rationing and Organizational Slack in Capital Budgeting.” Management Science 163-174, (February 1985).

  • Baiman, S., J.H. Evans, and N.J. Nagarajan, “Collusion in Auditing.” Journal of Accounting Research 1-18, (Spring 1991).

  • Balachandran, B.V., L. Li, and R.P. Magee, “On the Allocation of Fixed and Variable Costs from Service Departments.” Contemporary Accounting Research 164-185, (Fall 1987).

  • Balachandran, K.R. and J. Ronen, “Incentive Contracts when Production is Subcontracted.” European Journal of Operational Research, 169-185, (1989).

  • Banker, R.D. and S.M. Datar, “Optimal Transfer Pricing Under Post-Contract Information.” Contemporary Accounting Research, 329-352, (1992).

  • Cohen, S. and M. Loeb, “The Groves Scheme, Profit Sharing and Moral Hazard.” Management Science, 20-25, (January 1984).

  • Darrough, M. and N.M. Stoughton, “A Bargaining Approach to Profit Sharing in Joint Ventures.” Journal of Business, 237-270, (April 1989).

  • Demski, J.S. and D. Sappington, “Optimal Incentive Contracts with Multiple Agents.” Journal of Economic Theory, 152-171, (June 1984).

  • Eccles, R.G., Transfer Pricing as a Problem of Agency. Principals and Agents: The Structure of Business, Harvard Business Press, 1985.

  • Harris, M., C.H. Kriebel, and A. Raviv, “Asymmetric Information, Incentives and Intrafirm Resource Allocation.” Management Science, 604-620, (June 1982).

  • Hirshleifer, J., “On the Economics of Transfer Pricing.” The Journal of Business, 172-184, (July 1956).

  • Laffont, J. and D. Martimort, “Collusion Under Asymmetric Information.” Econometrica, 875-911, (July 1997).

  • Ma, C.T., “Unique Implementation of Incentive Contracts with Many Agents.” The Review of Economic Studies, 555-571, (October 1988).

  • Moore, J. and R. Repullo, “Subgame Perfect Implementation.” Econometrica, 1191-1220, (September 1988).

  • Myerson, R.B. and M.A. Satterthwaite, “Efficient Mechanisms for Bilateral Trading.” Journal of Economic Theory, 265-281, (1983).

  • Myerson, R.B., “Incentive Compatibility and the Bargaining Problem.” Econometrica, 61-73, (January 1979).

  • Ronen, J., “Transfer Pricing Reconsidered.” Journal of Public Economics, 125-136, (1992).

  • Ronen, J. and K.R. Balachandran, “An Approach to Transfer Pricing Under Uncertainty.” Journal of Accounting Research, 300-314, (Autumn 1988).

  • Ronen, J. and G. McKinney, “Transfer Pricing for Divisional Autonomy.” Journal of Accounting Research, 99-112, (Spring 1970).

  • Suh, Y., “Collusion and Noncontrollable Cost Allocation.”, Journal of Accounting Research, 22-46, (1987 Supplement).

    Google Scholar 

  • Villadsen, B., “Communication and Delegation in Collusive Agencies.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 19, 315-344, (1995).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, Sh., Balachandran, K.R. Collusion Proof Transfer Payment Schemes with Multiple Agents. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 15, 217–233 (2000).

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: