Skip to main content
Log in

Principal Component Analysis of Random Particles

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Particles are random sets whose position and orientation are irrelevant. They are traditionally handled by calculating summaries of shape, such as compactness and elongation, or by defining landmarks, whose positions are then subject to statistical analysis. It would be advantageous in many applications if shape variability could be addressed without the need for landmarks. This paper proposes a way to do this. The first step is to define similarity/distance between shapes. This is done in terms of the area of non-overlap between them, when they have been brought into the closest possible alignment. The resulting distance matrix can then be treated by the methods of principal coordinate analysis. It is shown that this is equivalent to principal component analysis on the binary sets in R2 defined as the regions within the shape outlines. The method is illustrated by application to a set of carrot outlines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. Baddeley and I. Molchanov, “Averaging of random sets based on their distance functions,” Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, Vol. 8, pp. 79-92, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  2. F.L. Bookstein, The Measurement of Biological Shape and Shape Change, Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  3. F.L. Bookstein, “Landmark methods for forms without landmarks: Morphometrics of group differences in outline shape,” Medical Image Analysis, Vol. 1, pp. 225-243, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  4. I. Craw and P. Cameron, “Face recognition by computer,” in Proc. Br. Machine Vision Conf., Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1992, pp. 489-507.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J.C. Davey, G.W. Horgan, and M.Talbot, “Image analysis:Atool for assessing plant uniformity and variety matching,” Journal of Applied Genetics, Vol. 38A, pp. 120-135, 1997. Principal Component Analysis 175

    Google Scholar 

  6. I.L. Dryden and K.V. Mardia, Statistical Shape Analysis, Wiley: Chichester, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  7. L.A. Galway, “Statistical analysis of star-shaped sets,” Ph.D. Thesis, Carnegie-Mellon University, USA, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  8. C.A. Glasbey and G.W. Horgan, Image Analysis for the Biological Sciences, Wiley: Chichester, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  9. C. Goodall, “Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape (with discussion),” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, Vol. 53, pp. 285-339, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  10. G.H. Granlund, “Fourier preprocessing for hand print character recognition,” IEEE Transactions on Computers, Vol. 21, pp. 195-201, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  11. G.W. Horgan, M. Talbot, and J.C. Davey, “Towards automatic recognition of plant varieties,” British Computer Society Electronic Workshops in Computing: The Challenge of Image Retrieval. http://www.ewic.org.uk/ewic/workshop/view.cfm/CIR-98. ISBN: 1-902505-13-1, 1998a.

  12. G.W. Horgan, M. Talbot, J.C. Davey, and R. Sharp, “Variety matching using shape & colour information,” Research Report to Scottish Agricultural Science Agency, East Craigs, Edinburgh, March 1998b.

    Google Scholar 

  13. G.W. Horgan, M. Talbot, and J.C. Davey, The statistical characterisation of object appearance. Submitted for publication. Preprints available from the author at g.horgan@bioss.sari.ac.uk.

  14. D.G. Kendall, “A survey of the statistical theory of shape,” Statistical Science, Vol. 4, pp. 87-120, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. Kirby and L. Sirovich, “Application of the Karhunen-Loeve procedure for the characterisation of human faces,” IEEE Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 12, pp. 103-108, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  16. V. Kreinovich and I.S. Molchanov, “How to define an average of several sets? I,” Geocombinatorics, Vol. 7, pp. 123-131, 1997; Vol. 8, pp. 160-165, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  17. W.J. Krzanowski, Principles of Multvariate Analysis: A User's Perspective, Oxford, 1993.

  18. A. Lanitis, C.J. Taylor, and T.F. Cootes, “Automatic face identification system using flexible appearance models,” Image and Vision Computing, Vol. 13, pp. 393-401, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. Lanitis, C.J. Taylor, and T.F. Cootes, “Automatic interpretation and coding of face images using flexible models,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 19, pp. 743-756, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  20. I. Molchanov, “Statistical problems for random sets,” in Random Sets: Theory and Applications, J. Goutsias, R.P.S. Mahler, and H.T. Nguyen (Eds.), Springer-Verlag: New York, 1997, pp. 27-46. IMA Volumes in Mathematics and Its Applications.

    Google Scholar 

  21. J. Serra, Image Analysis and Mathematical Morphology. Academic Press: London, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  22. D. Stoyan and I.S. Molchanov, “Set-valued means of random particles,” Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, Vol. 7, pp. 111-121, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  23. D. Stoyan and H. Stoyan, Fractals, Random Shapes and Point Fields, Wiley: Chichester, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  24. D. Wright, J. Stander, and K. Nicolaides, “Nonparametric density estimation and discrimination from shapes,” Applied Statistics, Vol. 46, pp. 365-382, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Horgan, G.W. Principal Component Analysis of Random Particles. Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision 12, 169–175 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008318507169

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008318507169

Navigation