Skip to main content
Log in

Evolving Control Strategies for Suppressing Heteroclinic Bursting

  • Published:
Dynamics and Control

Abstract

We combine a detailed understanding of the dynamics of low-dimensional models of burstingin the turbulent boundary layer with the method of Genetic Programming to obtain appropriate control strategies for the suppressionof such bursting in these models. The study is applicable toO(2) symmetric systems for which structurally stable heteroclinic cycles are the dominant dynamical features. We argue that such a combined approach can prove a useful tool in achieving control in higher-dimensional models where actual analysis is prohibitively complicated. The results of the present study are compared to near-optimal controllers derived in previous studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Armbruster, D., Guckenheimer, J. and Holmes, P., “Heteroclinic cycles and modulated traveling waves in systems with O(2) symmetry, ” Physica D, Vol. 29, pp. 257–282, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Armbruster, D., Guckenheimer, J. and Holmes, P., “Kuramoto-sivashinsky dynamics on the center unstable manifold, ” SIAM J. on Applied Math., Vol. 49, pp. 676–691, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Armbruster, D. and Chossat, P., “Heteroclinic Cycles in a Spherically Invariant System, ” Physica D, Vol. 50, pp. 155-176, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Aubry, N., Holmes, P., Lumley, J. L. and Stone, E., “The dynamics of coherent structures in the wall region of a turbulent boundary layer, ” J. Fluid Mech., Vol. 192, pp. 115–173, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Berkooz, G., Holmes, P. and Lumley, J. L., “Intermittent dynamics in simple models of the wall layer, ” J.Fluid Mech., Vol. 230, pp. 75–95, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bloch, A.M. and Marsden, J.E., “Controlling Homoclinic Orbits, ” Theoret. Comput. Fluid Dynamics, Vol. 1, pp. 179-190, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Coller. B.D., Suppression of Heteroclinic Bursts in Boundary Layer Models. PhD thesis, Cornell University, 1995.

  8. Coller, B.D., Holmes, P. and Lumley, J.L., “Control of bursting in boundary layer models, ” in A. S. Kobayashi, editor, Mechanics USA1994, Proceedings of the Twelfth US National Congress of Applied Mechanics, pages 139–143. Appl. Mech. Rev., 1994.

  9. Coller, B.D., Holmes, P. and Lumley, J.L., “Control of noisy heteroclinic cycles, ” Physica D, Vol. 72, pp. 135–160, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Coller, B.D., Holmes, P. and Lumley, J.L., “Interaction of adjacent bursts in the wall region, ” Phys. Fluids, Vol. 6, pp. 954–961, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Coller, B.D. and Holmes, P., “Suppression of bursts, ” Automatica, Vol. 33, pp. 1-11, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dankowicz, H., Chaos in Low-and High-Dimensional Systems. PhD thesis, Cornell University, 1995.

  13. Dankowicz, H., Holmes, P., Berkooz, G. and Elezgaray, J., “Local models of spatio-temporally complex fields, “ Physica D, Vol. 90, pp. 387–407, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Golubitsky, M., Stewart, I. and Schaeffer, D.G., Singularities and Groups in Bifurcation Theory, II. Springer-Verlag, 1988.

  15. Hirschberg, P. and Knobloch, E., “Arobust heteroclinic cycle in an O(2)×Z 2 steady-state mode interaction, ” Nonlinearity, Vol. 11, pp. 89-104, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Holland, J. H., Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. University of Michigan Press, 1975.

  17. Holmes, P.J., “Can dynamical systems approach turbulence?” In J.L. Lumley, editor, Whither turbulence, 1989.

  18. Holmes, P.J., Berkooz, G. and Lumley, J.L., “Turbulence, dynamical systems and the unreasonable effectiveness of empirical eigenfunctions, ” in I. Satake, editor, Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, Kyoto 1990. Springer-Verlag, 1991.

  19. Holmes, P., Lumley, J.L. and Berkooz, G., Turbulence, Coherent Structures, Dynamical Systems, and Symmetry. Cambridge University Press, 1996.

  20. Keefe, L., Moin, P. and Kim, J., “The dimension of attractors underlying periodic turbulent Poiseuille flow, ” J. Fluid Mech., Vol. 242, pp. 1–29, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kim, H.T., Kline, S.J. and Reynolds, W.C., “The production of turbulence near a smooth wall in a turbulent boundary layer, ” J. Fluid Mech., Vol. 50, pp. 133–160, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kline, S.J., Reynolds, W.C., Schraub, F.A. and Runstadler, P.W., “The structure of turbulent boundary layers, ” J. Fluid Mech., Vol. 30, pp. 741–773, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Koza, J. R., Genetic Programming. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1992.

  24. Lumley, J.L. and Kubo, I., “Turbulent drag reduction by polymer additives: a survey, ” in B. Gampert, editor, Influence of Polymer Additives on Velocity and Temperature Fields. Springer-Verlag, 1985.

  25. Mohler, R.R., Bilinear Control Processes: with Applications to Engineering, Ecology and Medicine. Academic Press, 1973.

  26. Stone, E., Gorman, M. and Robbins, K. A., “Identification of intermittent ordered patterns as heteroclinic connections, ” Physical Review Letters, Vol. 76, pp. 2061–2064, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Temam, R., Infinite-Dimensional Dynamical Systems in Mechanics and Physics. Springer-Verlag New York, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zongker D. and Punch, B., lil-gp 1.0 User's Manual. Michigan State University, 1995.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dankowicz, H., Coller, B.D. Evolving Control Strategies for Suppressing Heteroclinic Bursting. Dynamics and Control 9, 149–171 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008317829361

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008317829361

Navigation