References
Alchourrón, C. and Bulygin, E., 1971, Normative Systems, Vienna: Springer-Verlag.
Alchourrón, C. and Bulygin, E., 1981, “The expressive conception of norms,” pp. 95-124 in New Studies in Deontic Logic, R. Hilpinen, ed., Dordrecht: Reidel.
Alchourrón, C. and Makinson, D., 1981, “Hierarchies of regulations and their logic,” pp. 125-148 in New Studies in Deontic Logic, R. Hilpinen, ed., Dordrecht: Reidel.
Brewka, G., 1989, “Preferred subtheories: an extended logical framework for default reasoning,” pp. 1043-1048 in Proceedings of the Eleventh IJCAI, N.S. Sridharan, ed., Detroit, Michigan.
Bulygin, E., 1976, “Logische Fragen der Gesetzgebungstechnik,” pp. 612-627 in Studien zu einer Theorie der Gesetzgebung, J. Rödig, ed., Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
den Haan, 1996, “Automated Legal Reasoning,” Ph.D. Thesis, University of Amsterdam.
de Vey Mestdagh, C.N.J., 1997, Juridische Kennissystemen Rekentuig of Rekenmeester? Het Onderbrengen van Juridische Kennis in een Expertsystem voor het Milieuvergunningenrecht, Deventer: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Grice, H.P., 1975, “Logic and conversation,” pp. 41-82 in Syntax and Semantics, Vol. III, Speech Acts, P. Cole and J. Morgan, eds., New York: Academic Press.
Hage, J.C., 1997, Reasoning with Rules. An Essay on Legal Reasoning and Its Underlying Logic, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Leenes, R.E., 1998, “Hercules of Karneades,” Ph.D. Thesis, Twente.
Lodder, A.R., 1998, “DiaLaw. On legal justification and dialog games,” Ph.D. Thesis, Maastricht.
Loui, R.P., 1995, “Book review: Foucault, Derrida, women' speaking justified, and modelling legal argument,” Artificial Intelligence and Law 3, 143-150.
McCarthy, J., 1980, “Circumscription-A form of nonmonotonic reasoning,” Artificial Intelligence 13, 27-39.
McDermott, D. and Doyle, J., 1980, “Non-monotonic logic I,” Artificial Intelligence 13, 41-72.
Meyer, J.-J.Ch., 1989, “Formal methods in knowledge representation,” Nieuw Archief voor Wiskunde Serie 4 7, 205-213.
Moore, R.C., 1985, “Semantical considerations on nonmonotonic logic,” Artificial Intelligence 25, 75-94.
Perelman, Ch., 1963, The Idea of Justice and the Problem of Argument, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Poole, D.L., 1988, “A logical framework for default reasoning,” Artificial Intelligence 36, 27-47.
Prakken, H., 1993, “Logical tools for modelling legal argument,” Ph.D. Thesis, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Prakken, H., 1996, “Two approaches to the formalisation of defeasible deontic reasoning,” Studia Logica 57, 773-790.
Reiter, R., 1980, “A logic for default reasoning,” Artificial Intelligence 13, 81-132.
Reiter, R., 1987, “Nonmonotonic reasoning,” Annual Reviews of Computer Science 2, 147-186.
Royakkers, L.M.M., 1996, “Representing legal rules in deontic logic,” Ph.D. Thesis, Tilburg.
Royakkers, L.M.M. and Dignum, F., 1997, “Defeasible reasoning with legal rules,” pp. 263-286 in Defeasible Deontic Logic, D. Nute, ed., Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Smith, M., 1994, “Legal expert systems: Discussion of theoretical assumption,” Ph.D. Thesis, Utrecht.
van der Torre, L., 1997, “Reasoning about obligations. Defeasibility in preference-based deontic logic,” Ph.D. Thesis, Rotterdam.
van Kralingen, R., 1995, Frame-Based Conceptual Models of Statute Law, The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
Verheij, H.B., 1996, “Rules, reasons, arguments, formal studies of argumentation and defeat,” Ph.D. Thesis, Maastricht.
Visser, P.R.S., 1995, Knowledge Specification for Multiple Legal Tasks: A Case Study of the Interaction Problem in the Legal Domain, The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Royakkers, L. Henry Prakken, Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument: A Study of Defeasible Reasoning in Law. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 9, 379–387 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008311419377
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008311419377