Skip to main content
Log in

Fraud against European Public Funds

  • Published:
Crime, Law and Social Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article considers the approach adopted towards the fight against fraud within the European Union. It considers the role(s) of the various agencies at both a transnational and national level. It concludes that it is impossible to effectively fight transnational fraud across fifteen different legal systems. There is an urgent need for the “Corpus Juris” proposals to be adopted so that a defined European legal space can be created which is able to deal with crimes against the European budget.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Court of Auditors (1994), Special Report no 1/94, OJC 75. 12 March 1994.

  • Court of Auditors (1998), Audit Manual June.

  • Delmas-Marty, M., et al. (1997), “Corpus Juris”, Economica.

  • Doig, A. (1996), “A fragmented organizational approach to fraud in a European context”, European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, vol 3–2, pp. 48-73.

    Google Scholar 

  • H.M. Customs and Excise (1996), “Management Plan 1998–1999”, HMSO.

  • Intervention Board (1996), “Annual Report and Accounts 1995–96”, HMSO.

  • Laffan, B. and Shackleton, M. (1996), “The Budget”, in H. Wallace and W. Wallace (eds), Policy-making in the European Union, Oxford.

  • Official Journal of the European Communities, C/230, 22 July 1998.

  • Official Journal of the European Communities, C/327, European Commission (1995), “The Fight Against Fraud Annual Report 1994”, Com (95) 98, 29 March.

  • European Commission (1996), “The Fight Against Fraud Annual Report 1995”, Com 96 173 final, 8 May.

  • European Commission (1997), “The Fight Against Fraud Annual Report 1996”, Com (97).

  • The National Audit Office (1995), “The Intervention Board for Agricultural Produce: Preventing, Detecting, and Acting on Irregularities”, HMSO.

  • The National Audit Office (1997), “Combating Fraud and Irregularity in the European Community Budget”, HMSO.

  • Sieber, U. (1997), “EUROFRAUD — Organised Fraud Against the European Communities”, Paper delivered at Judicial and Administrative Co-operation and Mutual Assistance in the Common European Legal Space' Conference, Helsinki.

  • Usher, N. (1997), “The European Court of Auditors — The Fight Against Fraud”, UCLAF Seminar, Brussels, December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Duyne, P.C. (1993), Workshop: “Corruption in Europe”. In M. Punch, E. Kolthoff, K. van der Vijver and B. van Vliet (eds), Coping with Corruption in a Borderless World. Proceedings of the Fifth International Anti-Corruption Conference. Deventer, Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Duyne, P.C. (1996), “The Pantom and threat of organised crime”, Crime, Law and Social Change Vol. 24,No. 4.

  • Van Vliet, B. (1993), Workshop: “Corruption in Europe”, In M. Punch, E. Kolthoff, K. van der Vijver and B. van Vliet (eds), Coping with Corruption in a Borderless World. Proceedings of the Fifth International Anti-Corruption Conference, Deventer, Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, S. (1995), “Fraud against the European Community budget: the context of Community enforcement”, London School of Economics, Draft Conference Paper.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Quirke, B. Fraud against European Public Funds. Crime, Law and Social Change 31, 171–191 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008310504813

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008310504813

Keywords

Navigation