Skip to main content
Log in

Risk-Cost Analysis for the Regulation of Airborne Toxic Substances in a Developing Context: The Case of Arsenic in Chile

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most developing countries are just beginning to takeenvironmental protection seriously. In some cases it is common tocopy regulations from developed countries; however, determininghow much protection is required is difficult, ideally requiringthat the costs and risks be considered to propose a realistic andeffective policy. Chile has serious problems with arsenicpollution associated to emissions from its copper smelters. Toregulate these emissions, a strict ambient concentrationstandard, applicable to the whole country, is being proposed thatreduces risks to an acceptable level. However, little is knownabout the exposure and health effects associated to currentemission levels, and the corresponding costs of reducingemissions. The results of a three-year project that combinesengineering, economics and health information sheds light onthese costs and risks for different values of ambient standards.These show that there are ``win--win'' options that obtainsignificant health improvements at low, even negative, costs.However, costs quickly increase as the concentration standardbecomes more stringent, with few additional health benefits. Inmany locations naturally high background levels of arsenic makeit very costly or even impossible to reach the desired goal.These results make it necessary to examine the use of a case-by-caseregulation for each source, rather than a general one basedon a unique ambient quality goal. They also suggest that copyingstandards or risk criteria used in developed contexts can beextremely expensive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Díaz, C., H. Schwarze and J. Taylor (1995), ‘The Changing Landscape of Copper Smelting in the Americas’, Proceedings of Copper 95 International Conference, Vol. IV — Pirometallurgy of Copper, Santiago, Chile, November 26–29.

  • Ditz et al. (1995), Green Ledgers: Case Studies in Corporate Environmental Accounting. World Resources Institute, May.

  • Ferreccio, C., C. González, V. Milosavljevic and A. M. Sancha (1997), ‘Impacto en salud atribuible a exposición a arsénico: Un estudio de casos y controles’, ‘Protección de la Competitividad de los Productos Mineros de Chile: Antecedentes y Criterios para la Regulación del Arsénico’. Santiago, Chile: Universidad de Chile.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fondef (1997), Protección de la Competitividad de los Productos Mineros de Chile: Antecedentes y Criterios para la Regulación del Arsénico, Final Report. Santiago, Chile: Universidad de Chile.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘The Gallon Environmental Letter’ (1997), Canadian Institute for Business and the Environment, Vol. 1,No. 20, November 18.

  • George, Gottling and Newman (1995), ‘Modernization of Kennecott Utah Copper Smelter’, Proceedings of Copper 95 International Conference, Vol. IV — Pirometallurgy of Copper. Santiago, Chile, November 26–29.

  • Halsnaes, K. (1997), ‘Assessment of International Mitigation Costing Studies in Developing Countries’, UNEP Collaborating Centre on Energy and Environment. Denmark: Riso National Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanniala, P. (1996), ‘The Environmental and Economic Benefits of the Outokumpu Flash Smelting Technology for Different Kinds of Concentrates’, Proceedings of Clean Technology for the Mining Industry. Concepción, Chile: Universidad de Concepción.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, C. and A. Míller (1994), Green Gold. Boston, Estados Unidos: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Ryan, R. (1996), ‘Cost-Effective Policies to Improve Urban Air Quality in Santiago, Chile’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management(November) 31, 302-313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. et al. (1992), ‘Arsenic in the Environment and Its Incidence on Health’, International Seminar Proceedings, Vol. 97. Santiago, Chile, May, pp. 135-145.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP/WHO Global Environment Monitoring Programme (1986), ‘Guidelines for Integrated Air, Water, Food and Biological Exposure Monitoring’, Heal Project, Human Exposure Assessment Location. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • US EPA (1984), ‘Health Assessment Document for Inorganic Arsenic’, Final Report. EPA 600/8-83-021 F, March. Office of Health and Environmental Assessment, Washington DC 20460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Houtver, G. and M. Cropper (1996), ‘When is a Life to Costly to Save? The Evidence from U.S. Environmental Regulations’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 30, 348-368.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO (1987), Air Quality Guidelines for Europe. Denmark: WHO Regional Publications, European Series No. 23.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

O'Ryan, R., Díaz, M. Risk-Cost Analysis for the Regulation of Airborne Toxic Substances in a Developing Context: The Case of Arsenic in Chile. Environmental and Resource Economics 15, 115–134 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008300206313

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008300206313

Navigation