Abstract
A contingent ranking exercise was used to estimate the amenity loss for recreational users associated with pylons, overhead cables and pipelines along canals. Over 80% of canal users were willing to pay higher utility bills to reduce the number of service structures found along canals. Aggregated across all canal users, mean annual willingness to pay for a 1% decrease in service structures was estimated to be nearly £750,000. The implications of these findings could be significant in any future negotiations between British Waterways and those companies responsible for siting pipelines and cables along canals.
References
Beggs, S., S. Cardell and J. Hausman (1981), 'Assessing the Potential Demand for Electric Cars', Journal of Econometrics 16, 1–19.
British Waterways (1991), The British Waterways System: Perception and Use of the Inland Waterways. Watford: BritishWaterways Board.
British Waterways (1995), Results of 1995 Informal Visitor Survey. Watford: British Waterways Board.
Garrod, G. D. and K. G. Willis (1997), 'Measuring the Disamenity Associated with Pipes, Pylans and Overhead Cables at Recreational Sites',Working Paper 26. Centre for Rural Economy, University of NewcastleuponTyne.
Green, W. H. (1995), LIMDEP 7.0. Bellport: Econometric Software Inc.
Gujarati, D. N. (1995), Basic Econometrics: Third Edition. New York: McGrawHill.
Lareau, T. J. and D. A. Rae (1989), 'Valuing WTP for Diesel Odor Reductions: An Application of Contingent Ranking Technique', Southern Economic Journal 55, 728–742.
McFadden, D. (1974), 'On Conditional Logit Model of Qualitative Choice Behavior', in P. Zarembka, ed., Frontiers of Econometrics. New York: Academic Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Garrod, G., Willis, K. Using Contingent Ranking to Estimate the Loss of Amenity Value for Inland Waterways from Public Utility Service Structures. Environmental and Resource Economics 12, 241–247 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008290112833
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008290112833