Skip to main content
Log in

Degree of Multinationality and Financial Performance: A Study of U.S.-Based Multinational Corporations

  • Published:
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the marginal benefits that accrue to U.S.-based multinational corporations through increased international investment. Specifically, the study seeks to determine if increased degrees of multinationality produce additional benefits for multinational firms in terms of excess returns and/or reduced risk. The results indicate that during the period studied, the degree of multinationality did not have a significant influence on the risk and return performance of the sample firms. Thus, the study supports the findings of Qian (1996) and Siegel et al. (1995, 1995A) who report that the advantages enjoyed by multinational corporations may be going away.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agmon, T., and D. Lessard. “Investor recognition of corporate international diversification.” Journal of Finance 32, 1049–1055, (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, H., “Investor benefits from corporate international diversification.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 16, 113–126, (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosset, J., and J. Suret. “Political risk and stock portfolio diversification.” Journal of International Business Studies 26, 301–318, (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dussauge, P., and B. Garrette. “Determinants of success in international strategic alliance, Evidence from the global aerospace industry.” Journal of International Business Studies 26, 505–530, (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Errunza, V., and L. Senbet. “International corporate diversification, market valuation, and size-adjusted evidence.” Journal of Finance 39, 727–743, (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fatemi, A. “Shareholder benefits from corporate international diversification.” Journal of Finance 39, 1325–1344, (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grubel, H. “Internationally diversified portfolios: Welfare gains and capital flows.” The American Economic Review 5, 1299–1314, (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrigan, K. “Strategic alliances: Their new role in global competition.” Columbia Journal of World Business 22, 67–69, (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J., D. Logue, and R. Sweeney. “Corporate international diversification and market assigned measures of risk and diversification.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 10, 627–637, (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacquillat, B., and B. Solnik. “Multinationals are poor tools for diversification.” Journal of Portfolio Management 4, 8–12, (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. “The performance of mutual funds in the period 1945–1964.” Journal of Finance 389–416, (1968).

  • Johnston, J., Econometric Methods, second edition. McGraw-Hill, New York: pages 195–207, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, W., and E. Lyn. “Excess market value, the multinational corporations, and Tobin's q-ratio.” Journal of International Business Studies 17, 119–125, (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K., and C. Kwok. “Multinational corporations vs. domestic corporations: international environmental factors and determinants of capital structure.” Journal of International Business Studies 19, 195–217, (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, C., D. Hartzell, T. Grissom, and W. Grieg. “The composition of market portfolio and real estate investment performance.” Journal of American Real Estate and Urban Economics 18, 49–75, (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Markides, C., and C. Ittner. “Shareholder Benefits from Corporate International Diversification: Evidence from U.S. International Acquisitions.” Journal of International Business Studies 25, 343–366, (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, T., and J. Cosset. “The Measurement of the Degree of Foreign Involvement.” Applied Economics 27, 343–351, (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Picciotto, S. “International taxation and interfirm pricing in transnational groups.” Accounting, Organizations, and Society, 17, 759–792, (1992a).

    Google Scholar 

  • —. International Business Taxation. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1992b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M., and M. Fuller. Coalitions and global strategy. In M. Porter, editor, Competition in Global Industries, 315–344. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qian, G. “The Effect of Multinationality Measures upon the Risk-Return Performance of U.S. Firms.” International Business Review 5, 247–265, (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reilly, F., and R. Akhtar. “The benchmark error problem with global capital markets.” Journal of Portfolio Management 22, Iss. 1, 33–52, (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A. “Risk reduction by international diversification.” Journal of International Business Studies 7, 75–80, (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • Senchak, A., and W. Beedles. “Is indirect international diversification desirable?” Journal of Portfolio Management 6, 49–57, (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaked, I. “Are multinational corporations safer?” Journal of International Business Studies 17, 83–106, (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, W. “Capital asset prices, A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk.” Journal of Finance 19, 425–442, (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • Siddarthan, N., and S. Lall. “The recent growth of the largest U.S. multinationals.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 44, 1–13, (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, P., P. Theerathorn, and C. Alcerraca-Joaquin. “The determinants of systematic risk in multinational corporations after SFAS 52.” The International Journal of Accounting 27, 324–341, (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • —, K. Omer, J. Rigsby, and P. Theerathorn. “International diversification: A review and analysis.” Managerial Finance 21(9), 50–77, (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • —, K. Omer, and J. Leavins. “Corporate international diversification and performance: A comprehensive analysis of risk and returns.” Advances in Financial Planning and Forecasting 6, 77–94, (1995A).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinquefield, R. “Where are the gains from international diversification?” Financial Analysts Journal 52, 8–14, (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Theerathorn, P., C. Alcerreca-Joaquin, and P. Siegel. “Source of risk in U.S.-based multinational companies: A comparative cross-sectional analysis.” Advances in International Accounting 5, 193–209, (1992).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Omer, K., Durr, D. & Siegel, P. Degree of Multinationality and Financial Performance: A Study of U.S.-Based Multinational Corporations. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 11, 53–68 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008288309652

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008288309652

Navigation